生防菌哈茨木霉FJAT-9040深层发酵的生长适合度分析

葛慈斌; 刘波; 肖荣凤; 陈燕萍; 史怀

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.10.020

生防菌哈茨木霉FJAT-9040深层发酵的生长适合度分析

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.10.020

福建省农业科学院农业生物资源研究所,福建福州,350003

基金项目:

福建省财政专项——福建省农业科学院科技创新团队建设项目 (STIF-Y03)

农业部“引进国际先进农业科学技术”重点项目 (2011-G25)

公益性行业 (农业) 科研专项 (200903049)

详细信息

作者简介:
葛慈斌 (1973-), 男, 副研究员, 主要从事作物微生物防治研究 (E-mail:benci2000@sohu.com);刘波 (1957-), 男, 博士, 研究员, 主要从事微生物生物技术与农业生物药物研究 (E-mail:fzliubo@163.com)

中图分类号: S476
计量
- 文章访问数: 180
- HTML全文浏览量: 57
- PDF下载量: 7
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2013-08-12
- 刊出日期: 2013-10-18

Submerged Fermentation of Trichoderma harzianum,FJAT-9040

Institute of Agrobiological Resources,Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences

摘要

摘要: 为了解哈茨木霉Trichoderma harzianum菌株FJAT-9040在液体深层发酵培养过程中pH值、孢子数等参数及抑菌作用的动态变化, 采用50L全自动发酵罐对菌株FJAT-9040进行液体发酵培养, 检测不同发酵时段培养液的pH值、黏度、孢子数和菌丝干重等参数, 分析各参数间的相关性, 并探讨不同发酵时段的培养液和无菌上清液对枯萎病菌菌株FJAT-135的抑制作用。结果表明, 在菌株FJAT-9040的发酵过程中, 培养液pH值呈先降低、32h后缓慢上升的变化, 变化幅度较小;黏度值呈波浪式上升, 末期下降;孢子数的变化表现为前期下降、中期增长、后期基本稳定, 最大时达1.4×107 cfu·mL-1;菌丝干重则呈现阶梯式增长, 至发酵结束时达10.29mg·mL-1。发酵过程中, 培养液的pH值与黏度的相关性不显著, 但与孢子数和菌丝干重极显著相关;黏度也与孢子数、菌丝干重极显著相关;孢子数与菌丝干重也呈极显著相关。液体发酵的最适时间为96¹08h。各发酵时段的菌株FJAT-9040培养液对菌株FJAT-135都具有较强的抑制作用, 抑制率达77.92%以上;菌株FJAT-9040无菌上清液则未表现出抑菌作用。
- 哈茨木霉 /
- 液体发酵 /
- 生长适合度 /
- 菌丝干重 /
- 抑制作用
Abstract: Effect of medium pH, spore number and other factors on the submerged fermentation of the FJAT-9040 strain of Trichoderma harzianum and the inhibition activities of the resultant fermentation liquid and sterile supernatant on the strain FJAT-135of Fusarium oxysporum were investigated.The submerged fermentation was carried out in a 50Lautomatic fermentation vessel.Fermentation duration, pH, viscosity, spore count and dry mycelia weight were altered to study their correlations.The results showed that, during the fermentation, (a) the pH decreased initially but slowly increased after 32hours; (b) the viscosity showed an increase-decrease-increase trend and followed by a decline toward the end; (c) the spore count decreased firstly, increased at the mid-stage, and remained constant at the end;and (d) the dry mycelia weight increased stepwise to reach 10.29mg·mL-1at the end.Except between pH and viscosity, there were significant correlations between pH and spore count, between pH and dry mycelia weight, between viscosity and spore count, between viscosity and dry mycelia weight, as well as between spore count and dry mycelia weight.The optimum duration for the fermentation was 96-108hours.At different culture stages, all fermentation products were effective in inhibiting the growth of FJAT-135at a rate above 77.92%.On the other hand, the sterile supernatant of the fermentation liquid was not found to have the inhibiting effect.The results obtained from this study provide the basic information for the development of a costeffective submerged fermentation process of FJAT-9040.
- Trichoderma harzianum /
- submerged fermentation /
- growth fitness /
- dry mycelia weight /
- inhibition activity

HTML全文

参考文献(25)

[1]	ZIMAND G, ELAD Y.Effect of Trichoderma harzianum on Botrvtis cinerea pathogenicity[J].Phytothology, 1996, 86 (2) :945-956.
[2]	陈文瑞.哈茨木霉培养物防治温床番茄幼苗猝倒病研究[J].植物保护, 1990, 16 (6) :26-27.
[3]	SIVAN A, CHET I.The possible role of competition between Trichoderma harzianum and Fusarium oxysporun on rhizosphere colonization[J].Phytopathology, 1989, 79 (2) :198.
[4]	李琼芳, 曾华兰, 叶鹏盛, 等.哈茨木霉 (Trichoderma harzianum) T23生防菌筛选及防治中药材根腐病的研究[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版, 2007, 29 (11) :119-122.
[5]	魏林, 梁志怀, 曾粮斌, 等.哈茨木霉T2-16代谢产物诱导豇豆幼苗抗枯萎病研究[J].湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2004, 30 (5) :443-445.
[6]	WEINDLING R.Studies on lethal principle effective in the parasitic action of Trichoderma harzianum on Rhizoclonia solania and other soil fungi[J].Phytopathology, 1932, 22 (6) :837-845.
[7]	刘任, 卢兆金.哈茨木霉T2菌株对辣椒土传真菌病害的控制作用[J].仲恺农业技术学院学报, 2003, 16 (1) :6-11.
[8]	HSER A R.Myrothecium diseases of greenhouse ornamentals[J].Ornamental Outlook, 2000, 9 (1) :76–78, 82.
[9]	姚彬, 王傲雪, 李景富.哈茨木霉对4种番茄病原真菌抑制作用的研究[J].东北农业大学学报, 2009, 40 (5) :26-31.
[10]	张衡宇.植病生防菌哈茨木霉 (Trichoderma harzianum) 的研究[D].福州:福建农林大学, 2011.
[11]	肖荣凤, 刘波, 史怀, 等.生防菌哈茨木霉FJAT-9040的GFP标记及土壤定殖示踪[J].植物保护学报, 2011, 38 (6) :506-512.
[12]	庄敬华, 高增贵, 刘限, 等.不同发酵条件对木霉产孢类型的影响[J].中国生物防治, 2005, 21 (1) :37-40.
[13]	邹勇, 文成敬, 唐贵群, 等.几个因素对木霉菌株T33产生厚垣孢子的影响[J].微生物学通报, 2006, 33 (4) :43-47.
[14]	秦芸, 叶华智, 黄云, 等.影响木霉菌厚垣孢子产生因素初探[J].云南农业大学学报, 2002, 17 (4) :416-417.
[15]	沈萍, 陈向东.微生物学[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2000.
[16]	陈燕萍, 刘波, 葛慈斌, 等.作物青枯病植物疫苗工程菌FJAT-T8发酵过程生长适合度研究[J].福建农业学报, 2012, 27 (3) :287-293.
[17]	刘忠华, 张文学, 张其圣, 等.模拟窖池发酵过程中各种环境因子的变化规律研究[J].酿酒科技, 2006, (12) :17-20.
[18]	赵林果, 王平, 宗雅冬, 等.黑曲霉分泌β-葡萄糖苷酶过程中pH值的调控[J].化学与生物工程, 2008, 25 (12) :48-51.
[19]	王春魁.浅谈发酵液黏度在抗生素发酵生产中的探索和应用[J].科技风, 2010, (15) :253-253, 255.
[20]	崔凤杰, 陶文沂, 许泓瑜, 等.搅拌转速和通气量对灰树花深层发酵培养的影响[J].食品与生物技术学报, 2006, 25 (4) :67-71 , 80.
[21]	李雁群, 章克昌.苦参对灵芝发酵液流变特性的影响[J].食品工业科技, 2003, 24 (12) :34-35.
[22]	高智谋, 曹君, 潘月敏, 等.哈茨木霉TH-1对棉花枯萎病菌和黄萎病菌的拮抗机制研究[J].棉花学报, 2007, 19 (3) :168-172.
[23]	HORACE G C, RICHARD H C, FANIST G, et al.6-pentyl-a-pyrone from Trichoderma harzianum:Its planter growth inhibitory and antimicrobial properties[J].Agric Biol Chem, 1986, 50 (11) :2943-2945.
[24]	XU T, TSALA N G, OMOKOLO N D, et al.Antagonism in vitro of Trichodermaspp.NT9and TC3against the fungal pathogens of cocoyam root rot disease[J].Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural University, 1994, 20 (3) :221-227.
[25]	柳良好, 徐同.哈茨木霉几丁质酶诱导及其对水稻纹枯病菌的拮抗作用[J].植物病理学报, 2003, 33 (4) :359-363.