• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

罗汉果土传病害拮抗细菌的筛选及鉴定

王瑞昊 邓业成 陈广桂 张泽 张燕玲 邓志勇 蓝福生 郭丽霞 张川梅 梁保明 骆海玉 张明良

王瑞昊,邓业成,陈广桂,等. 罗汉果土传病害拮抗细菌的筛选及鉴定 [J]. 福建农业学报,2021,36(8):927−935 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2021.08.009
引用本文: 王瑞昊,邓业成,陈广桂,等. 罗汉果土传病害拮抗细菌的筛选及鉴定 [J]. 福建农业学报,2021,36(8):927−935 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2021.08.009
WANG R H, DENG Y C, CHEN G G, et al. Antagonistic Bacteria against Soil-borne Diseases on Siraitia grosvenorii [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2021,36(8):927−935 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2021.08.009
Citation: WANG R H, DENG Y C, CHEN G G, et al. Antagonistic Bacteria against Soil-borne Diseases on Siraitia grosvenorii [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2021,36(8):927−935 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2021.08.009

罗汉果土传病害拮抗细菌的筛选及鉴定

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2021.08.009
基金项目: 广西重点研发计划项目(桂科AB1850025);桂林市重点研发计划项目(20190211-19)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    王瑞昊(1995−),男,硕士生,主要从事天然产物研究(E-mail:429567099@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    邓业成(1965−),男,博士,教授,主要从事天然产物及植物保护研究(E-mail:dyecheng@163.com

  • 中图分类号: S 435

Antagonistic Bacteria against Soil-borne Diseases on Siraitia grosvenorii

  • 摘要:   目的  从罗汉果根际土壤中筛选分离出对白绢病(southern blight)与根腐病(root rot)有抑制作用的拮抗细菌,为罗汉果土传病害生物防治提供合适菌株。  方法  采用稀释涂布法和划线法从罗汉果果园土壤中分离纯化出拮抗细菌114株。随后对分离出的拮抗细菌采用平板对峙法进行抑菌活性筛选。通过16S rDNA序列分析,结合菌落形态特征,生理生化特征对菌株进行鉴定。  结果  22株细菌对至少1种罗汉果土传病原真菌表现出不同程度的抑制作用。其中5株细菌即TYX-2、TYX-3、TYX-4、TYX-7和TYX-8对根腐病与白绢病抑制作用最为明显,对罗汉果根腐病菌的抑制率分别为67.53%、57.50%、64.17%、60.00%和66.67%。对罗汉果白绢病菌的抑制率分别为83.03%、87.58%、53.31%、82.27%和86.67%。经过形态学、生理生化特征以及16S rDNA系统发育树的分析,确定TYX-2、TYX-7和TYX-8为贝莱斯芽孢杆菌(Bacillus velezia),TYX-3为枯草芽孢杆菌(Bacillus subtilis),TYX-4为解淀粉芽孢杆菌(Bacillus amyloliquefaciens)。贝莱斯芽孢杆菌TYX-2、枯草芽孢杆菌TYX-3和解淀粉芽孢杆菌TYX-4发酵液对2种罗汉果病原真菌也有较好的抑制作用,对罗汉果根腐病菌的抑菌率分别为47.83%、48.67%和45.83%,对罗汉果白绢病菌的抑菌率分别为52.00%、50.42%和55.83%。  结论  分离鉴定出的TYX-2、TYX-3和TYX-4分别为贝莱斯芽孢杆菌、枯草芽孢杆菌和解淀粉芽孢杆菌,具有较高的生防应用价值,为进一步研制复合生防菌剂,防治罗汉果土传病害奠定理论基础。
  • 图  1  土壤细菌对罗汉果土壤病原菌的抑制作用

    注:A~E分别为TYX-4、TYX-2、TYX-3、TYX-7、TYX-8对根腐病的抑制效果。G~K分别为TYX-4、TYX-2、TYX-3、TYX-7、TYX-8对白绢病的抑制效果。F为根腐病对照,L为白绢病对照。

    Figure  1.  Inhibition of bacteria strains on pathogens of S. grosvenorii

    Note: A~E respectively TYX-4, TYX-2, TYX-3, TYX-7, TYX-8 inhibit effect on root rot.G~K respectively TYX-4, TYX-2, TYX-3, TYX-7, TYX-8 inhibitory effect on Southern blight.F is the root rot control,L is the Southern blight control.

    图  2  生防细菌的菌落形态

    Figure  2.  Colony morphology of bacteria strains with biocontrol potential

    图  3  菌株TYX-2的16S rDNA序列系统发育树

    Figure  3.  Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rDNA sequence of TYX-2

    图  4  菌株TYX-3的16S rDNA序列系统发育树

    Figure  4.  Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rDNA sequence of TYX-3

    图  5  菌株TYX-4的16S rDNA序列系统发育树

    Figure  5.  Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rDNA sequence of TYX-4

    图  6  菌株TYX-7的16S rDNA序列系统发育树

    Figure  6.  Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rDNA sequence of TYX-7

    图  7  菌株TYX-8的16S rDNA序列系统发育树

    Figure  7.  Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rDNA sequence of TYX-8

    图  8  拮抗菌株发酵产物对病原菌的抑菌效果

    注:A、B、C依次为TYX-2、TYX-3、TYX-4对根腐病的抑菌效果。D、E、F依次为TYX-2、TYX-3、TYX-4对根腐病的抑菌效果,G、H为根腐病菌和白绢病菌对照组。

    Figure  8.  Antibacterial effect of fermentation broths of antagonistic strains on pathogens

    Note: A, B, C are the antibacterial effects of TYX-2, TYX-3, and TYX-4 on root rot. D, E, F are the antibacterial effects of TYX-2, TYX-3, and TYX-4 on root rot in turn. G and H are the control group of root rot and. Southern blight.

    表  1  22株土壤细菌对罗汉果2种土传病原真菌的拮抗活性

    Table  1.   Antagonistic activities of 22 strains of bacteria against pathogens of two soil-borne diseases on S. grosvenorii

    菌株 Strain抑菌率(± SD)Inhibition rate/%菌株 Strain抑菌率(± SD)Inhibition rate/%
    根腐病菌 Root rot白绢病菌 Southern blight根腐病菌 Root rot白绢病菌 Southern blight
    TYX-1 31.66 ± 3.57 14.81 ± 2.58 TYX-13 7.36 ± 1.54
    TYX-2 67.53 ± 2.89 83.03 ± 0.86 TYX-14 38.85 ± 1.33
    TYX-3 57.50 ± 2.04 87.58 ± 1.67 TYX-15 5.26 ± 0.56 5.89 ± 0.49
    TYX-4 64.17 ± 1.18 53.31 ± 0.86 TYX-16 13.82 ± 5.89
    TYX-5 27.43 ± 2.63 TYX-17 27.54 ± 2.36 25.90 ± 0.38
    TYX-6 16.63 ± 5.52 20.56 ± 0.84 TYX-18 35.63 ± 5.27 14.45 ± 2.23
    TYX-7 60.00 ± 2.04 82.27 ± 2.97 TYX-19 23.13 ± 2.45
    TYX-8 66.67 ± 1.16 86.68 ± 0.59 TYX-20 15.84 ± 0.33
    TYX-9 36.67 ± 11.79 TYX-21 34.19 ± 1.44 15.43 ± 0.00
    TYX-10 35.86 ± 5.48 16.22 ± 0.56 TYX-22 31.29 ± 2.51
    TYX-11 8.33 ± 1.22 CK
    TYX-12 25.31 ± 1.89 45.72 ± 2.47
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  LB琼脂平板上各菌株形态

    Table  2.   Colony morphology of various strains on LB agar

    菌株
    Strain
    菌落生长速度
    Colony growth
    菌落颜色
    Colony color
    菌落形态
    Colony morphology
    表面形态
    Surface morphology
    菌落表面
    Colony surface
    TYX-2 白色 呈圆形菌落 平整 黏稠湿润
    TYX-3 白色 呈圆形菌落 平整 干燥
    TYX-4 淡黄 呈椭圆菌落 粗糙 光滑湿润
    TYX-7 白色 呈椭圆菌落 平整 湿润黏稠
    TYX-8 白色 呈椭圆菌落 平整 湿润黏稠
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  拮抗细菌的生理生化特征

    Table  3.   Physiochemical properties of bacteria strains with biocontrol potential

    测定指标Test index 菌株 Strain
    TYX-4TYX-2TYX-7TYX-3TYX-8
    革兰氏染色Gram stain + + + + +
    过氧化氢接触酶Oxidize activities + + + + +
    吲哚产生Indole test + +
    明胶水解Gelatin hydrolysis + + + +
    甲基红Methl red test
    淀粉水解Starch hydrolusis + + + + +
    乳糖Lactose
    甘露醇Mannitol + + +
    葡萄糖Glucose + + + + +
    D-木糖D-Xylose +
    D-果糖D-Fructose +
    接触酶Catalase + + + + +
    柠檬酸盐利用Citrate utilization + +
    V-P实验Voges-Proskauer + + + + +
    注:+代表反应为阳性,−代表反应为阴性。
    Note: + indicates that the reaction is positive,and − indicates that the reaction is negative.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  拮抗菌株发酵产物的抑菌效果

    Table  4.   Antibacterial effect of fermentation broths of antagonistic strains

    菌株 Strain抑菌率(± SD) Inhibition rate/%
    根腐病菌 Root rot白绢病菌 Southern blight
    TYX-2 47.83 ± 2.53 52.00 ± 2.23
    TYX-3 48.67 ± 2.27 50.42 ± 3.93
    TYX-4 45.83 ± 2.76 55.83 ± 2.35
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 赵二劳, 赵丽婷, 李满秀. 罗汉果的保健功能及产品开发 [J]. 食品研究与开发, 2006, 27(3):125−126. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2006.03.049

    ZHAO E L, ZHAO L T, LI M X. Health-care function and products development of siraitiagrosvenorii [J]. Food Research and Development, 2006, 27(3): 125−126.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2006.03.049
    [2] 黄志江, 黄捷, 孙滢川. 罗汉果的药用研究 [J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 1998, 16(4):75−79.

    HUANG Z J, HUANG J, SUN Y C, et al. A Survey in the pharmaceutical studies on siraitiagrosvenorii [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 1998, 16(4): 75−79.(in Chinese)
    [3] MURILLO A C, MULLENS B A. A review of the biology, ecology, and control of the northern fowl mite, Ornithonyssus sylviarum (Acari: Macronyssidae) [J]. Veterinary parasitology, 2017, 246: 30−37. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.09.002
    [4] 何斐, 张忠良, 崔鸣, 等. 生防放线菌剂对魔芋根域微生物区系的影响 [J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2015, 21(2):221−227.

    HE F, ZHANG Z L, CUI M, et al. Effect of biocontrol actinomycetes agents on microflora in the root-zone of Amorphophallus konjacorphophallus konjac K. Koch ex N. E. Br K. Koch ex N. E. Br [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2015, 21(2): 221−227.(in Chinese)
    [5] 陈志杰, 张锋, 张淑莲, 等. 温室黄瓜土传病害流行因素及环境友好型防治技术对策 [J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2006(B09):697−700.

    CHEN Z J, ZHANG F, ZHANG S L, et al. Epidemic factors of soil-borne diseases of cucumber and environment-friendly control technique under sunlight greenhouse in loess hilly region [J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2006(B09): 697−700.(in Chinese)
    [6] 高菲, 卜春亚, 靳永胜, 等. 草莓根腐病拮抗细菌的分离筛选与鉴定 [J]. 广东农业科学, 2012, 39(3):4−8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2012.03.002

    GAO F, BU C Y, JIN Y S, et al. Screening and identification of antagonistic bacteria against Colletotrichumgloeosporioides [J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 39(3): 4−8.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2012.03.002
    [7] AHMED A S, EZZIYYANI M, PÉREZ SÁNCHEZ C, et al. Effect of chitin on biological control activity of Bacillus spp. and Trichoderma harzianum against root rot disease in pepper (Capsicumannuum) plants [J]. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2003, 109(6): 692−711.
    [8] 季倩茹, 陈静, 胡远亮, 等. 3种芽孢杆菌菌剂对黄瓜枯萎病的防效及其作用机制初探 [J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2020, 39(5):101−107.

    JI Q R, CHEN J, HU Y L, et al. Control effect of three Bacillus strains on cucumber fusarium wilt and its mechanism [J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2020, 39(5): 101−107.(in Chinese)
    [9] 柳慧丽. 枯草芽孢杆菌KC-5的分离鉴定及发酵工艺优化[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2014.

    LIU H L. Isolation and Identification of Bacillicus Subtilis KC-5 and Its Fermentation Optimization[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2014. (in Chinese).
    [10] 何亚登. 2种生防菌的发酵、土壤定殖及防治烟草土传病害的研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2019.

    HE Y D. Study on Fermentation and Soil Colonization and Control of Tobacco Soil-Borne Diseases of Two Biocontrol Agents[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2019. (in Chinese).
    [11] 东秀珠, 蔡妙英. 常见细菌系统鉴定手册[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001.
    [12] 任凤山, 高亮, 张博. 5种杀菌剂防治番茄茎腐病的室内筛选和田间使用效果 [J]. 农学学报, 2016, 6(5):18−22. doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas15090002

    REN F S, GAO L, ZHANG B. Laboratory Screening and Field Control Effect of Five Kinds of Fungicides on Tomato Basal Stem Rot [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2016, 6(5): 18−22.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas15090002
    [13] 高琳娜, 曹克强, 段英姿, 等. 拮抗细菌Bs-0728对板蓝根根腐病的防治作用 [J]. 植物保护, 2011, 37(5):97−100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1542.2011.05.017

    GAO L N, CAO K Q, DUAN Y Z, et al. Biocontrol of Isatisindigotica root rot by the bacterial strain Bs-0728 [J]. Plant protection,, 2011, 37(5): 97−100.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1542.2011.05.017
    [14] CHAURASIA B, PANDEY A, PALNI L M S, et al. Diffusible and volatile compounds produced by an antagonistic Bacillus subtilis strain cause structural deformations in pathogenic fungi in vitro [J]. Microbiological Research, 2005, 160(1): 75−81. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2004.09.013
    [15] BOWERS J H, LOCKE J C. Effect of formulated plant extracts and oils on population density of Phytophthora nicotianae in soil and control of Phytophthora blight in the greenhouse [J]. Plant Disease, 2004, 88(1): 11−16. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.1.11
    [16] 闫博巍. 土地类芽孢杆菌对玉米促生作用及其对大斑病生防机理研究[D]. 大庆: 黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2020.

    YAN B W. Research on the growth-promoting effect of Paenibacillus terrae on maize and its biological control mechanism against NCLB[D]. Daqing: Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2020. (in Chinese).
  • 加载中
图(8) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  909
  • HTML全文浏览量:  309
  • PDF下载量:  64
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-02-01
  • 修回日期:  2021-05-03
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-05-17
  • 刊出日期:  2021-08-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回