• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

粘质沙雷氏菌FZSF02中转录调控因子OmpR的生物学功能

贾宪波, 刘方晨, 赵恪, 林俊杰, 方宇, 陈济琛

贾宪波,刘方晨,赵恪,等. 粘质沙雷氏菌FZSF02中转录调控因子OmpR的生物学功能 [J]. 福建农业学报,2021,36(12):1491−1498. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2021.12.014
引用本文: 贾宪波,刘方晨,赵恪,等. 粘质沙雷氏菌FZSF02中转录调控因子OmpR的生物学功能 [J]. 福建农业学报,2021,36(12):1491−1498. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2021.12.014
JIA X B, LIU F C, ZHAO K, et al. Biological Functions of Transcription Factor OmpR in Serratia marcescens FZSF02 [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2021,36(12):1491−1498. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2021.12.014
Citation: JIA X B, LIU F C, ZHAO K, et al. Biological Functions of Transcription Factor OmpR in Serratia marcescens FZSF02 [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2021,36(12):1491−1498. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2021.12.014

粘质沙雷氏菌FZSF02中转录调控因子OmpR的生物学功能

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(31800068);福建省农业科学院科技创新团队建设项目(CXTD2021002-3)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    贾宪波(1986−),男,博士,助理研究员,研究方向:环境微生物(E-mail:xbj2011@163.com

    通讯作者:

    陈济琛(1964−),男,研究员,研究方向:农业微生物(E-mail:chenjichen2001@163.com

  • 中图分类号: Q 939

Biological Functions of Transcription Factor OmpR in Serratia marcescens FZSF02

  • 摘要:
      目的  探索EnvZ/OmpR双组分调控系统的效应蛋白OmpR对粘质沙雷氏菌FZSF02灵菌红素合成及其他生物学特性的影响。
      方法  同源重组法构建ompR敲除菌株,琼脂平板产色试验和qPCR检测OmpR对菌株灵菌红素合成的影响,结晶紫染色法和琼脂平板法等研究基因敲除菌株生物被膜形成能力,运动性和对不同环境胁迫因素的耐受性。
      结果  序列分析显示OmpR为序列高度保守的蛋白。PCR验证证明ompR基因敲除成功;与野生型菌株相比∆ompR失去灵菌红素合成能力,qPCR试验显示灵菌红素合成基因簇中3个关键基因pigApigFpigN转录水平分别降低为野生型菌株的3.8%,2.0%和2.1%;∆ompR菌株生物被膜生成能力较野生型降低37.5%(37 ℃)和15.1%(27 ℃);OmpR对该菌的生长能力、运动能力和响应环境胁迫的能力无明显影响。
      结论  ompR为一新报道的特异性调控粘质沙雷氏菌灵菌红素合成的基因,且该基因对该菌生物被膜的形成有重要影响。
    Abstract:
      Objective   Biological functions of the regulatory protein ompR in the two component EnvZ/OmpR system, including prodigiosin-producing ability and other biological characteristics, of Serratia marcescens FZSF02 were studied.
      Methods   Homologous recombination was used to construct ompR-knockout S. marcescens FZSF02. Effect of OmpR on the prodigiosin-producing ability was examined by LB agar plate incubation and qPCR. Methods of crystal violet staining, agar plate incubation, and others were applied to determine the biofilm-forming, mobility, and stress adaptation abilities of the transcription factor protein under various environmental stresses.
      Results   OmpR was a protein with high conserved amino acid sequences. An ompR- deleted strain, FZSF02 ∆ompR, was successfully obtained by homologous recombination and confirmed by PCR. As a result, FZSF02 ∆ompR lost prodigiosin-producing ability that possessed by the wild strain. The transcriptional levels of pigA, pigF, and pigN of the prodigiosin biosynthesis gene cluster in FZSF02 ∆ompR were respectively 3.8%, 2.0% and 2.1% of the wild type strain. The biofilm formation of FZSF02 ∆ompR declined 37.5% (at 37 ℃) and 15.1% (at 27 ℃) from its wild counterpart. On the other hand, OmpR exhibited no significant effect on the growth, mobility, or response to the environmental stress.
      Conclusion   OmpR was a newly reported gene that specifically regulated the prodigiosin biosynthesis in S. marcescens. It also significantly affected the biofilm formation but not on the growth, mobility, or stress response.
  • 【研究意义】粘质沙雷氏菌(Serratia marcescens)是肠杆菌科中的一类革兰氏阴性短杆状细菌,该菌在土壤、水体等环境中广泛分布[1]。粘质沙雷氏菌发现于1819年,20世纪70年代确认该种中某些菌株为条件致病菌[2]。近年陆续发现,粘质沙雷氏菌可以产生多种有潜力的次生代谢物质,如肽类抗生素,生物表面活性剂serrawettin W1和灵菌红素[3-5]等。该菌也可作为底盘微生物高产N-乙酰神经氨酸[6]、乙偶姻和丁二醇等高附加值产品[7-8]。因此,粘质沙雷氏菌已成为有重要前景的工业微生物菌种,研究其产物合成及调控相关基因以揭示其产物合成机制有助于挖掘其生产潜力。【前人研究进展】灵菌红素类物质由于具有抗菌和抗肿瘤等生物活性而成为近年研究热点,粘质沙雷氏菌是特异性产灵菌红素的最主要菌种[9]。研究表明,粘质沙雷氏菌合成灵菌红素受多个基因调控,包括细菌群体感应相关基因,双组分系统相关基因和其他调控基因[10]。双组分调控系统广泛存在于细菌中,参与压力响应、细菌形态、 运动性、 菌毛合成及毒力表现等[11],典型的双组分系统由作为传感器的跨膜组氨酸激酶和作为效应分子的一个细胞质蛋白组成[12]。目前已知双组分系统PigQ/PigW、PhoB/PhoR和EepR/EepS正调控粘质沙雷氏菌灵菌红素的合成[13-15],双组分系统RssB/RssA [16]对灵菌红素的合成起到负调控作用。更多灵菌红素合成相关调控基因的揭示有助于理解该类菌株合成灵菌红素的调控机制和规律。【本研究切入点】EnvZ/OmpR是一个典型的双组分调控系统,但是其对粘质沙雷氏菌灵菌红素合成及其他生物学特性的影响知之甚少。【拟解决的关键问题】利用从一株高产灵菌红素粘质沙雷氏菌FZSF02菌株[17]的Tn5转座子突变体库中获得一株ompR突变株,检测ompR敲除对菌株生物学特性的影响,初步揭示EnvZ/OmpR双组分调控系统对粘质沙雷氏菌的作用。

    大肠杆菌DH5α由本实验室保存,粘质沙雷氏菌FZSF02由本实验室自土壤中分离,粘质沙雷氏菌FZSF02ompR:: Tn5源自本实验室由FZSF02构建的Tn5转座子突变体库。

    供试培养基及抗生素购自生工生物工程(上海)股份有限公司,高保真DNA聚合酶PrimeSTAR® Max DNA Polymerase(Takara,R045A),克隆试剂盒Zero Background pTOPO-Blunt Simple Cloning Kit购自北京艾德莱生物科技有限公司,转座子突变试剂盒EZ-Tn5™ <KAN-2>Tnp Transposome™ Kit (TSM99K2, Epicentre),细菌总RNA提取试剂盒(TIANGEN,DP430)购自天根生化科技(北京)有限公司,琼脂粉(BD:Becton, Dickinson and Company),吐温80(国药集团),脱脂奶粉(BD:Becton, Dickinson and Company),血琼脂平板(青岛海博生物),96孔细胞培养板(Greiner Bio-One,No.655180),美国MD SpectraMax190全波长酶标仪,电转化仪Gene Pulser Xcell(Bio-Rad)。

    调取目的基因的编码蛋白序列,通过NCBI(National Center for Biotechnology Information)网站中blastp功能比对查找与目的蛋白同源的蛋白序列并预测蛋白的功能,挑选隶属不同种属的同源蛋白序列,应用MEGA5.0软件Neighbor-joining法构建该蛋白的系统发育树。

    LB琼脂平板上挑取FZSF02菌株1个单菌落置于50 mL液体LB培养基中,37 ℃、180 r·min−1培养12 h作为种子液,以1% (v/v)的接种量转接至50 mL液体LB培养基中37 ℃,180 r·min−1培养至OD600约1.0时将盛有菌液的摇瓶冰浴30 min,冰浴结束后转移至50 mL离心管于4 ℃离心机中5 000 r·min−1离心10 min;弃上清后用40 mL预冷的无菌水洗涤后4 ℃离心10 min,重复用无菌水洗涤离心1次;用40 mL的冰预冷的10%甘油洗涤后4%离心10 min,重复用10%甘油洗涤离心一次;用0.5 mL,10%甘油悬浮菌体沉淀,以 100 μL每管分装至1.5 mL离心管后保存在−80 ℃备用。

    ompR突变株的构建应用转座子突变试剂盒EZ-Tn5™ <KAN-2>Tnp Transposome™ Kit (TSM99K2, Epicentre)。转座子插入位置的鉴定应用High TAIL-PCR [18-19]ompR基因的敲除应用同源重组法,扩增含有启动子的卡那抗性基因,应用ompR前端引物OmpRFF和OmpRFR扩增ompR上游同源臂,应用OmpRBF和OmpRBR扩增ompR基因的下游同源臂,将3段序列通过重叠PCR(Overlap PCR)拼接后连接Zero Background pTOPO-Blunt质粒,在氨苄青霉素和卡那霉素双抗性LB琼脂平板上筛选阳性克隆子。以阳性克隆子质粒为模板应用引物OmpRFF和OmpRBR扩增获得含有ompR上游同源臂、卡那霉素抗性基因和ompR下游同源臂的DNA片段,片段经纯化后用灭菌超纯水洗脱。上述PCR扩增所用引物详细序列见表1。通过电击转化将上述DNA片段转化FZSF02野生型菌株,电转参数为:25 μF, 200 ohm, 1 800 V。在卡那霉素质量浓度为100 mg·L−1的LB琼脂平板上挑取单克隆验证。

    表  1  供试引物
    Table  1.  Primers used in this study
    引物 Primer序列 Sequence(5′-3′)
    OmpRFF ATGCAAGAGAATCATAAGATCCTG
    OmpRFR CATCGATGATGGTTGAGAGTCGGCGCCGATTTCCAGCCCCA
    OmpRBF CTCGATGAGTTTTTCTAAGGCAAATTCAAACTGAACCTCGGC
    OmpRBR TCATGCCTTGCTGCCGTCCGGTAC
    KanF TCTCAACCATCATCGATGAATTGT
    KanR TTAGAAAAACTCATCGAGCATCAA
    pigAF CGCCATCTTCCACGATTCAA
    pigAR CATTAGCCGACACTGTTCCA
    pigFF CACGGTATTCGGCGATGAC
    pigFR CACGGTGTTGCGAGAAGT
    pigNF CGGTTACCCTGGTCTATTG
    pigNR TGTCAGCACGATGTTCAT
    16SF CGTTACTCGCAGAAGAAGCA
    16SR TCACCGCTACACCTGGAA
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格

    挑单菌落至50 mL液体培养基中,37 ℃、180 r·min−1培养FZSF02野生型菌株WT和基因敲除菌株ΔompR过夜作为种子液,调整种子液含量至OD600为1.0,分别以0.5%的接种量转接WT和ΔompR至50 mL的LB液体培养基中,分别于27 ℃和37 ℃,180 r·min−1培养,每隔3 h取样测定菌液的OD600值,绘制生长曲线。

    用接种环分别挑取野生型菌株WT,转座子突变菌株FZSF02 ompR:: Tn5和基因敲除菌株FZSF02ΔompR划线于分为三区的LB固体琼脂平板上,平板倒置于27℃的恒温培养箱中培养36 h后观察菌株的产色能力。

    用细菌RNA提取试剂盒(TIANGEN,DP430)提取菌株的总RNA,应用FastKing gDNA Dispelling RT SuperMix(TIANGEN,KR118)进行反转录获取菌株cDNA,应用TransStart® Green qPCR SuperMix (TransGen,AQ101)进行qPCR扩增。qPCR以16SrDNA作为内参基因(引物为16SF和16SR),分别应用引物pigAF/pigAR,pigFF/pigFR和pigNF/pigNR检测灵菌红素合成基因簇中pigApigFpigN基因的转录水平变化。qPCR引物序列信息见表1

    分别挑取WT和ompR菌株单菌落至50 mL液体培养基中,于37 ℃、180 r·min−1培养过夜作为种子液,调整2个种子液含量至OD600值为1.0后以0.5%的接种量转接至50 mL的LB液体培养基中,从接种后的培养基中吸取200 μL至96孔细胞培养板中分别置于27 ℃和37 ℃培养,设置多个复孔作为重复。培养36 h测定各孔OD600后将培养板中的菌液吸出,用PBS缓冲液清洗各孔5次,倒置在滤纸上10 min以彻底除去孔中的PBS,向各孔加入200 μL 1%的结晶紫染料,染色30 min后吸出结晶紫,用PBS清洗各孔5次,倒置放置培养板10 min除去残留的PBS,用200 μL无水乙醇溶解各孔中的结晶紫,测定各孔OD595值。菌株的产膜能力用各菌株OD595/OD600值表示。

    配制琼脂含量分别为0.3%(m/V)和0.7%(m/V)的LB琼脂平板,分别吸取2 μL OD600值为2.0的WT和ΔompR菌液滴至各平板的中心位置,置于27℃培养箱培养,观察琼脂含量为0.3%(m/V)的平板上菌株的游动(swimming)能力,0.7%琼脂平板上菌株的涌动(swarming)能力。

    制备脱脂奶粉含量为1%(m/V)的LB琼脂平板用以检测蛋白酶产生能力,吐温80含量为1%(V/V)的LB琼脂平板用以检测脂肪酶产生能力,应用血琼脂平板检测菌株的溶血素产生能力。将2 μL OD600值为1.0的菌液滴于琼脂平板上,置于27 ℃培养48 h通过观察蛋白酶和脂肪酶酶活圈的有无和大小比较菌株的产酶能力;27 ℃培养24 h和7 d观察溶血素活性。

    菌株的胁迫耐受性实验参考Brzostek等[20]和Gao等[21]的方法进行。菌株分别在pH 3.0处理10 min、55 ℃处理5 min、15 mmol·L−1过氧化氢处理10 min和2 mol·L−1的氯化钠处理1 h后稀释涂布LB琼脂平板进行菌落计数,以不经胁迫处理的菌株的菌数作为对照,分别计算经各胁迫因素处理后菌株的存活率。

    粘质沙雷氏菌FZSF02菌株ompR基因有720个碱基(NCBI序列号:QJU42212.1),编码由239个氨基酸组成的OmpR蛋白。序列比对分析显示其氨基酸序列在不同物种间较为保守,与从前100个目标序列(Max target sequences)中所选代表不同属种的20株菌的相似性为99.16%~100.00%,系统发育树也显示出类似结果(图1)。其中,与3株沙雷氏菌属菌株的序列相似性为100.00%,与大肠杆菌等其他序列相似性为99.16%~99.58%。

    图  1  粘质沙雷氏菌FZSF02菌株OmpR基于氨基酸序列的系统发育分析
    注:括号中是对应物种蛋白在GenBank中的序列编号
    Figure  1.  Phylogenetic analysis on OmpR from S. marcescens FZSF02 with its homologous proteins
    Note:Numbers in brackets are GenBank sequence accession for respective proteins.

    应用同源重组法构建ompR缺失菌株,挑取具卡那霉素抗性的疑似单菌落应用引物OmpRFF和OmpRBR验证,分别以FZSF02野生株和Tn5转座子突变株FZSF02 ompR:: Tn5作为对照。结果(图2)显示,以野生株FZSF02基因组为模板扩增得到大小为720 bp的单一条带,为ompR完整序列;以FZSF02 ompR:: Tn5基因组为模板扩增得到1 920 bp的单一条带,该序列由1 200 bp的Tn5转座子序列和被其插入的720 bp的ompR序列组成;以FZSF02ΔompR基因组为模板扩增得到大小为1 540 bp的条带,该序列由ompR上游300 bp,下游300 bp和中间940 bp的卡那抗性基因组成。琼脂糖凝胶电泳和测序结果均表明由卡那抗性基因替换掉120 bp ompR基因序列的ompR缺失菌株FZSF02ΔompR构建成功。

    图  2  粘质沙雷氏菌FZSF02菌株ompR基因敲除验证
    注:应用引物OmpRFF和OmpRBR进行PCR。泳道M:DNA分子量标准;泳道1:FZSF02野生型;泳道2:ompR基因Tn5转座子插入突变体FZSF02 ompR:: Tn5;泳道3:ompR基因被敲除120 bp的菌株FZSF02ΔompR。
    Figure  2.  Agarose gel electrophoresis identification of ompR-knockout S. marcescens FZSF02
    Note:PCR were carried out with primers OmpRFF and OmpRBR. Lane M: DNA marker; Lane 1: wild type FZSF02; Lane 2: FZSF02 ompR:: Tn5 with ompR inserted by Tn5 transposon; Lane 3: FZSF02ΔompR with 120 bp ompR-knockout.

    生长曲线显示FZSF02和FZSF02ΔompR在27 ℃(图3-A)和37℃(图3-B)条件下在LB液体培养基中的生长能力相似。FZSF02在27 ℃培养条件下24 h OD600值达到最大值6.60,48 h降至6.13;菌株ΔompR 24 h最高值为6.44,48 h降至6.27。37 ℃培养条件下,FZSF02在第21 h OD600值达到最大5.74,此后逐步降低至48 h 4.1;ΔompR 21 h达到最大值5.80,48 h降低至4.0。上述数据说明ompR基因的缺失对该菌的生长无明显影响。

    图  3  FZSF02野生菌株与ompR敲除菌株FZSF02ΔompR的生长曲线
    注:A:野生型菌株WT和基因敲除菌株FZSF02ΔompR在27 ℃条件的生长曲线。B:野生型菌株WT和基因敲除菌株FZSF02ΔompR在37 ℃条件的生长曲线。
    Figure  3.  Growth curves of WT and ΔompR of FZSF02
    Note:A: Growth curves of WT and FZSF02ΔompR at 27 ℃. B: Growth curves of WT and FZSF02ΔompR at 37 ℃.

    LB固体平板试验显示,ompR 转座子插入突变菌株FZSF02 ompR::Tn5和缺失菌株FZSF02ΔompR均丧失灵菌红素产生能力(图4-A)。Pig基因簇大小约20 kb,由14个基因pigA-pigN按顺序排列;pigApigFpigN分别是基因簇第1个、第6个和第14个基因,上述三个基因的表达水平可以反映该基因簇总体表达水平。 qPCR显示,FZSF02ΔompR菌株中灵菌红素合成基因簇中pigApigFpigN基因的表达水平分别降低为野生型菌株的3.8%,2.0%和2.1%(图4-B),说明OmpR对灵菌红素合成的影响是通过调控灵菌红素合成基因簇的转录实现的。

    图  4  OmpR对Serratia marcescens FZSF02产灵菌红素能力及灵菌红素合成基因表达的影响
    注:A:野生型菌株FZSF02, ompR 转座子突变菌株和ompR敲除菌株在LB琼脂平板上的生长情况。FZSF02, FZSF02 ompR:: Tn5 and FZSF02ΔompR分别代表野生型菌株,Tn5插入突变菌株和ompR敲除菌株。B:ompR基因敲除对零菌红素合成基因的影响。pigA, pigFpigN为零菌红素合成基因簇上的3个基因。Log2倍数变化值代表上述三个基因在基因敲除菌株FZSF02ΔompR中相对野生型菌株的表达量变化。
    Figure  4.  Effects of OmpR on prodigiosin-producing ability and expressions of prodigiosin biosynthesis genes of S. marcescens FZSF02
    Note:A: Prodigiosin-producing abilities of FZSF02, ompR mutant strain, and ompR-knockout strain on LB agar at 27 ℃. FZSF02, FZSF02 ompR:: Tn5, and FZSF02ΔompR were WT strain, Tn5 transposon insertion strain, and ompR-knockout strain, respectively. B: Deletion of ompR on expression of prodigiosin biosynthesis genes. pigA, pigF, and pigN were 3 genes in prodigiosin biosynthesis gene cluster. Log 2-fold change values represent expression levels of these genes in FZSF02ΔompR as compared to WT FZSF02.

    生物被膜测定结果显示ompR部分缺失后生物被膜形成能力降低,37 ℃培养条件下FZSF02ΔompR的生物膜量较FZSF02野生型菌株降低37.5%(P<0.01),27 ℃培养条件下生物被膜量降低15.1%(P<0.01),表明OmpR参与了该菌生物被膜的合成(图5)。

    图  5  OmpR对Serratia marcescens FZSF02生物膜合成能力的影响
    注:27 ℃和37 ℃液体培养条件下野生型菌株WT和基因敲除菌株ΔompR的产生物被膜能力检测。
    Figure  5.  Effect of OmpR on biofilm-producing ability of S. marcescens FZSF02
    Note:Biofilm-producing ability of WT andΔompR were assayed after incubation in liquid LB at 27 ℃ and 37 ℃ for 36 h.

    检测野生型菌株和基因敲除菌株FZSF02ΔompR在琼脂含量为0.3%的LB平板上的游动能力(swimming),菌株FZSF02和ΔompR的菌落直径分别为7.32 cm和7.18 cm;在0.7%琼脂含量的LB平板上的涌动能力(swarming)试验显示FZSF02和ΔompR的菌落直径分别为5.51 cm和5.67 cm,数值无显著性差异(图6),说明OmpR对该菌的运动性无明显影响。野生型菌株WT和FZSF02ΔompR均有产蛋白酶能力(酶活圈直径分别为2.1 cm和2.2 cm)(图7-A)和脂肪酶能力(酶活圈直径分别为1.6 cm和1.7 cm)(图7-B),从酶活圈直径评价二者产酶能力无明显区别。WT和FZSF02ΔompR溶血能力相似,在培养第24 h时均无明显溶血圈(图7-C),培养至第7天时都产生微弱的溶血圈(图7-D)。

    图  6  Serratia marcescens FZSF02和FZSF02ΔompR的运动能力
    注:在0.3%(w/v)和0.7%(w/v)琼脂的LB固体平板上检测Serratia marcescens FZSF02和基因敲除菌株FZSF02ΔompR运动的菌落直径。
    Figure  6.  Mobility of S. marcescens FZSF02 and FZSF02ΔompR
    Note:Mobility diameters of S. marcescens FZSF02 and FZSF02ΔompR were assayed on solid LB plates containing 0.3% (w/v) and 0.7% (w/v) agar, respectively.
    图  7  Serratia marcescens FZSF02和FZSF02ΔompR的产酶能力
    注:WT和ΔompR分别代表Serratia marcescens FZSF02野生型菌株和ompR敲除菌株。A:在含1% (w/v)脱脂奶粉的LB固体琼脂培养基上的蛋白酶产生能力。B:在含1%(v/v) tween 80的固体琼脂培养基上的脂肪酶产生能力。C和D:在血琼脂培养基上27 ℃条件下培养24小时和7天观察溶血素产生能力。
    Figure  7.  Enzyme-producing abilities of S. marcescens FZSF02 and FZSF02ΔompR
    Note:WT andΔompR represent WT and ompR-knockout S. marcescens FZSF02, respectively. A: Protease-producing ability on LB agar plates containing 1% (w/v) of skim milk. B: Lipase-producing ability on LB agar plates containing 1% (v/v) of tween 80. C and D: Hemolysin-producing abilities on blood agar base medium after incubation at 27 ℃ for 24 h (C) and 7 days (D), respectively.

    检测了野生型菌株和基因敲除菌株FZSF02ΔompR在高温,低pH,高盐和强氧化环境下的存活能力。55 ℃高温处理后野生型菌株和∆ompR的存活率分别为0.15%和0.11%;pH3.0条件下处理后存活率分别为22.72%和28.35%;2 mol·L−1 NaCl处理后的存活率分别为92.45%和90.65%;氧化剂0.22 mol·L−1 H2O2处理后的存活率分别为22.40%和23.84%。说明上述胁迫条件下二者存活率无明显差异(表2)。

    表  2  胁迫条件下WT与∆ompR的存活率
    Table  2.  Survival rates of WT and ∆ompR under stress                  (单位:%)
    胁迫条件
    Stress factor
    WT 存活率
    Survival rate of WT
    ompR 存活率
    Survival rate of ∆ompR
    pH=3 22.72±3.40 a 28.35±4.10 a
    55 ℃ 0.15±0.01 a 0.11±0.05 a
    2 mol·L−1 NaCl 92.45±2.60 a 90.65±3.80 a
    0.22 mol·L−1 H2O2 22.40±1.30 a 23.84±1.10 a
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格

    本研究成功构建了粘质沙雷氏菌FZSF02的ompR敲除菌株,通过对突变体和野生型的对比研究了OmpR对粘质沙雷氏菌FZSF02灵菌红素产生能力,生物膜形成能力,产酶能力,运动性和适应胁迫等生物学特性的影响。

    粘质沙雷氏菌合成灵菌红素受已报道的30多种基因调控 [22],双组分调控系统是其中重要的一类调控基因。目前在粘质沙雷氏菌菌株中发现的参与色素合成调控的双组分系统有PigQ/PigW[13](与BarA/UvrY系统高度同源 [23])、PhoB/PhoR [14]、RssB/RssA[16]和 EepR/EepS [15]。PigQ/PigW,PhoB/PhoR和eepR/eepS双组分系统是通过效应蛋白直接与pigA上游启动子区结合激活灵菌红素基因簇的表达而正向调控灵菌红素合成[13-15];RssB/RssA调控系统通过RssB与pigA上游启动子直接结合抑制灵菌红素基因簇表达从而负调控灵菌红素的合成 [16]。本研究EnvZ/OmpR双组分调控系统效应蛋白基因ompR敲除后菌株完全丧失灵菌红素合成能力,对pigA-N基因簇中分别处于基因簇上游、中游和下游的pigApigFpigN基因转录水平应用qPCR检测,结果显示ompR敲除菌株中灵菌红素合成基因簇中3个基因转录水平明显降低,说明转录调控因子OmpR正调控该菌株灵菌红素的合成,该调控可能通过影响整个基因簇的转录实现。ompR是本研究新鉴定的参与粘质沙雷氏菌灵菌红素合成调控的双组分系统效应基因,有别于已报道的其他4种双组分调控系统,其是否与PigQ/PigW,PhoB/PhoR和eepR/eepS双组份系统类似通过与pigA上游启动子直接结合从而正调控灵菌红素基因簇的表达有待通过凝胶迁移试验和DNaseI足迹试验等进一步研究。

    OmpR对多种微生物生物膜的形成有重要影响。ompR缺失或突变降低大肠杆菌[24-25]Yersinia enterocolitica [26]和肠炎沙门氏菌Salmonella enteritidis[27]生物被膜的形成,但是对Acinetobacter baumannii Strain AB5075生物被膜形成能力无影响 [28]。菌株FZSF02 ompR缺失菌株生物被膜形成量在37 ℃时降低37.5%,降低程度与Yersinia enterocoliticaompR突变株类似(降低33%)[26],小于肠炎沙门氏菌Salmonella enteritidis(降低75%以上)[27]。上述结果暗示OmpR对细菌生物被膜形成的影响有一定的普遍性。

    OmpR影响细菌多个微生物学特性,虽然在不同种属间OmpR序列高度保守,但是在不同菌株中其作用不同甚至相反。ompR敲除后Acinetobacter baumannii Strain AB5075的游动和涌动能力下降[26],但是在Xenorhabdus nematophila[29]中运动能力显著增强。Xenorhabdus nematophila ompR基因敲除菌株蛋白酶,脂肪酶和溶血能力均明显增强[29]Yersinia enterocolitica菌株ompR基因敲除后对高盐渗透压、低pH、过氧化氢和高温胁迫条件的适应性均明显降低[20];但是Yersinia pestis ompR基因敲除菌株对高盐、低pH和高温条件较野生型菌株更为敏感,但是对过氧化氢耐受性增强[21]。本研究对菌株FZSF02上述生物学特性进行探讨,显示ompR敲除后该菌运动性,产酶能力及环境胁迫的适应性均无明显变化。说明OmpR在粘质沙雷氏菌FZSF02菌株中功能与已报道的菌株不同,这反映了OmpR在不同微生物中调控功能的多样性和复杂性。

    综上,本研究发现在粘质沙雷氏菌FZSF02菌株中OmpR特异性正调控灵菌红素的合成,同时一定程度上影响生物被膜的形成。EnvZ/OmpR代表一个新的灵菌红素合成调控系统,其具体调控机制有待深入研究。

  • 图  1   粘质沙雷氏菌FZSF02菌株OmpR基于氨基酸序列的系统发育分析

    注:括号中是对应物种蛋白在GenBank中的序列编号

    Figure  1.   Phylogenetic analysis on OmpR from S. marcescens FZSF02 with its homologous proteins

    Note:Numbers in brackets are GenBank sequence accession for respective proteins.

    图  2   粘质沙雷氏菌FZSF02菌株ompR基因敲除验证

    注:应用引物OmpRFF和OmpRBR进行PCR。泳道M:DNA分子量标准;泳道1:FZSF02野生型;泳道2:ompR基因Tn5转座子插入突变体FZSF02 ompR:: Tn5;泳道3:ompR基因被敲除120 bp的菌株FZSF02ΔompR。

    Figure  2.   Agarose gel electrophoresis identification of ompR-knockout S. marcescens FZSF02

    Note:PCR were carried out with primers OmpRFF and OmpRBR. Lane M: DNA marker; Lane 1: wild type FZSF02; Lane 2: FZSF02 ompR:: Tn5 with ompR inserted by Tn5 transposon; Lane 3: FZSF02ΔompR with 120 bp ompR-knockout.

    图  3   FZSF02野生菌株与ompR敲除菌株FZSF02ΔompR的生长曲线

    注:A:野生型菌株WT和基因敲除菌株FZSF02ΔompR在27 ℃条件的生长曲线。B:野生型菌株WT和基因敲除菌株FZSF02ΔompR在37 ℃条件的生长曲线。

    Figure  3.   Growth curves of WT and ΔompR of FZSF02

    Note:A: Growth curves of WT and FZSF02ΔompR at 27 ℃. B: Growth curves of WT and FZSF02ΔompR at 37 ℃.

    图  4   OmpR对Serratia marcescens FZSF02产灵菌红素能力及灵菌红素合成基因表达的影响

    注:A:野生型菌株FZSF02, ompR 转座子突变菌株和ompR敲除菌株在LB琼脂平板上的生长情况。FZSF02, FZSF02 ompR:: Tn5 and FZSF02ΔompR分别代表野生型菌株,Tn5插入突变菌株和ompR敲除菌株。B:ompR基因敲除对零菌红素合成基因的影响。pigA, pigFpigN为零菌红素合成基因簇上的3个基因。Log2倍数变化值代表上述三个基因在基因敲除菌株FZSF02ΔompR中相对野生型菌株的表达量变化。

    Figure  4.   Effects of OmpR on prodigiosin-producing ability and expressions of prodigiosin biosynthesis genes of S. marcescens FZSF02

    Note:A: Prodigiosin-producing abilities of FZSF02, ompR mutant strain, and ompR-knockout strain on LB agar at 27 ℃. FZSF02, FZSF02 ompR:: Tn5, and FZSF02ΔompR were WT strain, Tn5 transposon insertion strain, and ompR-knockout strain, respectively. B: Deletion of ompR on expression of prodigiosin biosynthesis genes. pigA, pigF, and pigN were 3 genes in prodigiosin biosynthesis gene cluster. Log 2-fold change values represent expression levels of these genes in FZSF02ΔompR as compared to WT FZSF02.

    图  5   OmpR对Serratia marcescens FZSF02生物膜合成能力的影响

    注:27 ℃和37 ℃液体培养条件下野生型菌株WT和基因敲除菌株ΔompR的产生物被膜能力检测。

    Figure  5.   Effect of OmpR on biofilm-producing ability of S. marcescens FZSF02

    Note:Biofilm-producing ability of WT andΔompR were assayed after incubation in liquid LB at 27 ℃ and 37 ℃ for 36 h.

    图  6   Serratia marcescens FZSF02和FZSF02ΔompR的运动能力

    注:在0.3%(w/v)和0.7%(w/v)琼脂的LB固体平板上检测Serratia marcescens FZSF02和基因敲除菌株FZSF02ΔompR运动的菌落直径。

    Figure  6.   Mobility of S. marcescens FZSF02 and FZSF02ΔompR

    Note:Mobility diameters of S. marcescens FZSF02 and FZSF02ΔompR were assayed on solid LB plates containing 0.3% (w/v) and 0.7% (w/v) agar, respectively.

    图  7   Serratia marcescens FZSF02和FZSF02ΔompR的产酶能力

    注:WT和ΔompR分别代表Serratia marcescens FZSF02野生型菌株和ompR敲除菌株。A:在含1% (w/v)脱脂奶粉的LB固体琼脂培养基上的蛋白酶产生能力。B:在含1%(v/v) tween 80的固体琼脂培养基上的脂肪酶产生能力。C和D:在血琼脂培养基上27 ℃条件下培养24小时和7天观察溶血素产生能力。

    Figure  7.   Enzyme-producing abilities of S. marcescens FZSF02 and FZSF02ΔompR

    Note:WT andΔompR represent WT and ompR-knockout S. marcescens FZSF02, respectively. A: Protease-producing ability on LB agar plates containing 1% (w/v) of skim milk. B: Lipase-producing ability on LB agar plates containing 1% (v/v) of tween 80. C and D: Hemolysin-producing abilities on blood agar base medium after incubation at 27 ℃ for 24 h (C) and 7 days (D), respectively.

    表  1   供试引物

    Table  1   Primers used in this study

    引物 Primer序列 Sequence(5′-3′)
    OmpRFF ATGCAAGAGAATCATAAGATCCTG
    OmpRFR CATCGATGATGGTTGAGAGTCGGCGCCGATTTCCAGCCCCA
    OmpRBF CTCGATGAGTTTTTCTAAGGCAAATTCAAACTGAACCTCGGC
    OmpRBR TCATGCCTTGCTGCCGTCCGGTAC
    KanF TCTCAACCATCATCGATGAATTGT
    KanR TTAGAAAAACTCATCGAGCATCAA
    pigAF CGCCATCTTCCACGATTCAA
    pigAR CATTAGCCGACACTGTTCCA
    pigFF CACGGTATTCGGCGATGAC
    pigFR CACGGTGTTGCGAGAAGT
    pigNF CGGTTACCCTGGTCTATTG
    pigNR TGTCAGCACGATGTTCAT
    16SF CGTTACTCGCAGAAGAAGCA
    16SR TCACCGCTACACCTGGAA
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   胁迫条件下WT与∆ompR的存活率

    Table  2   Survival rates of WT and ∆ompR under stress                  (单位:%)

    胁迫条件
    Stress factor
    WT 存活率
    Survival rate of WT
    ompR 存活率
    Survival rate of ∆ompR
    pH=3 22.72±3.40 a 28.35±4.10 a
    55 ℃ 0.15±0.01 a 0.11±0.05 a
    2 mol·L−1 NaCl 92.45±2.60 a 90.65±3.80 a
    0.22 mol·L−1 H2O2 22.40±1.30 a 23.84±1.10 a
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    MA H Y, YANG B, WANG H W, et al. Application of Serratia marcescens RZ-21 significantly enhances peanut yield and remediates continuously cropped peanut soil [J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2016, 96(1): 245−253. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.7087

    [2]

    MAHLEN S D. Serratia infections: from military experiments to current practice [J]. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 2011, 24(4): 755−91. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00017-11

    [3]

    WILLIAMSON N R, FINERAN P C, LEEPER F J, et al. The biosynthesis and regulation of bacterial prodiginines [J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2006, 4(12): 887−99. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro1531

    [4]

    GERC A J, SONG L, CHALLIS G L, et al. The insect pathogen Serratia marcescens Db10 uses a hybrid non-ribosomal peptide synthetase-polyketide synthase to produce the antibiotic althiomycin [J]. Plos One, 2012, 7(9): e44673. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044673

    [5]

    ARAUJO H W C, ANDRADE R F S, MONTERO R D, et al. Sustainable biosurfactant produced by Serratia marcescens UCP 1549 and its suitability for agricultural and marine bioremediation applications [J]. Microbial Cell Factories, 2019, 18(1).

    [6]

    YAN Q, FONG S S. Design and modularized optimization of one-step production of N-acetylneuraminic acid from chitin in Serratia marcescens [J]. Biotechnology & Bioengineering, 2018, 115(9): 2255−2267.

    [7]

    BAI F M, DAI L, FAN J Y, et al. Engineered Serratia marcescens for efficient (3R)-acetoin and (2R, 3R)-2, 3-butanediol production [J]. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2015, 42(5): 779−786.

    [8]

    LV X, DAI L, BAI F M, et al. Metabolic engineering of Serratia marcescens MG1 for enhanced production of (3R)-acetoin [J]. Bioresources & Bioprocessing, 2016, 3(1): 52.

    [9]

    SUN Y, WANG L J, PAN X W, et al. Improved prodigiosin production by relieving CpxR temperature-sensitive inhibition [J]. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2020(8): 344.

    [10] 尤忠毓, 王玉洁, 孙诗清, 等. 微生物发酵法生产灵菌红素研究进展 [J]. 生物工程学报, 2016, 32(10):1332−1347.

    YOU Z Y, WANG Y J, SUN S Q, et al. Progress in microbial production of prodigiosin [J]. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao, 2016, 32(10): 1332−1347.(in Chinese)

    [11]

    PRUB B M. Involvement of two-component signaling on bacterial motility and biofilm development [J]. Journal of Bacteriology, 2011, 199(18): 00259−17.

    [12] 王栋, 王少辉, 张焕容, 等. 双组分系统rcsC基因影响禽致病性大肠杆菌的致病性及相关生物学特性 [J]. 微生物学报, 2019, 59(3):468−477.

    WANG D, WANG S H, ZHANG H R, et al. Two-component system rcsC gene affects pathogenicity and associated biological characteristics of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli [J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2019, 59(3): 468−477.(in Chinese)

    [13]

    PETER C. FINERAN, HHLLY S, et al. Biosynthesis of tripyrrole and β‐lactam secondary metabolites in Serratia: integration of quorum sensing with multiple new regulatory components in the control of prodigiosin and carbapenem antibiotic production [J]. Molecular microbiology, 2005, 56(6): 1495−1517. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04660.x

    [14]

    TZMZIN G, PETER C F, LEE E, et al. The PhoBR two-component system regulates antibiotic biosynthesis in Serratia in response to phosphate [J]. BMC microbiology, 2009, 9(1): 112. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-112

    [15]

    NICHOLAS A S, RONI M L, KIMBERLY M B, et al. Serratia marcescens cyclic AMP receptor protein controls transcription of EepR, a novel regulator of antimicrobial secondary metabolites [J]. Journal of Bacteriology, 2015, 197(15): 2468−2478. DOI: 10.1128/JB.00136-15

    [16]

    HOMG Y T, CHANG K C, LIU Y N, et al. The RssB/RssA two-component system regulates biosynthesis of the tripyrrole antibiotic, prodigiosin, in Serratia marcescens [J]. International Journal of Medical Microbiology, 2010, 300(5): 304−312. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.01.003

    [17]

    LIN C Q, JIA X B, FANG Y, et al. Enhanced production of prodigiosin by Serratia marcescens FZSF02 in the form of pigment pellets [J]. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 2019, 40: 58−64. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejbt.2019.04.007

    [18]

    LIU Y G, CHEN Y. High-efficiency thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR for amplification of unknown flanking sequences [J]. Biotechniques, 2007, 43(5): 649−654. DOI: 10.2144/000112601

    [19]

    JIA X B, LIN X J, CHEN J C. Linear and exponential TAIL-PCR: a method for efficient and quick amplification of flanking sequences adjacent to Tn5 transposon insertion sites [J]. AMB Express, 2017, 7(1): 195. DOI: 10.1186/s13568-017-0495-x

    [20]

    BRZOSTEK K, RACZKOWSKA A, ZASADA A. The osmotic regulator OmpR is involved in the response of Yersinia enterocolitica O: 9 to environmental stresses and survival within macrophages [J]. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2010, 2: 265−271.

    [21]

    GAN H, ZHANG Y Q, HAN Y P, et al. Phenotypic and transcriptional analysis of the osmotic regulator OmpR in Yersinia pestis [J]. BMC Microbiology, 2011, 11(1): 39. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-39

    [22]

    PAN X W, TANG M, YOU J J, et al. Regulator RcsB controls prodigiosin synthesis and various cellular processes in Serratia marcescens JNB5-1 [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2021, 87(2): e02052−20.

    [23]

    NABIL M W, GEORGE P C S. The stationary phase sigma factor, RpoS, regulates the production of a carbapenem antibiotic, a bioactive prodigiosin and virulence in the enterobacterial pathogen Serratia sp. ATCC 39006 [J]. Microbiology, 2012, 158(3): 648−658. DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.055780-0

    [24]

    VIDAL O, LONGIN R, PRIGENT C C, et al. Isolation of an Escherichia coli K-12 mutant strain able to form biofilms on inert surfaces: involvement of a new ompR allele that increases curli expression [J]. Journal of Bacteriology, 1998, 180(9): 2442−2449. DOI: 10.1128/JB.180.9.2442-2449.1998

    [25]

    PRUSS B, BESEMANN C, DENTON A, et al. A complex transcription network controls the early stages of biofilm development by Escherichia coli [J]. Journal of Bacteriology, 2006, 188: 3731−3739. DOI: 10.1128/JB.01780-05

    [26]

    MENG J, BAI J Q, XU J H, et al. Differential regulation of physiological activities by RcsB and OmpR in Yersinia enterocolitica [J]. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2019, 366(17): 1−9.

    [27] 董洪燕, 彭大新, 焦新安, 等. 肠炎沙门氏菌鸡源株ompR基因缺失株的构建及生物学特性与亲本株的比较 [J]. 微生物学报, 2011, 51(9):1256−1262.

    DONG H Y, PENG D X, JIAO X A, et al. Construction and characterization of an ompR gene deletion mutant fromSalmonella enteritidis [J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2011, 51(9): 1256−1262.(in Chinese)

    [28]

    TIPTON K A, RATHER P N. An ompR-envZ Two-component system ortholog regulates phase variation, osmotic tolerance, motility, and virulence in Acinetobacter baumannii strain AB5075 [J]. Journal of Bacteriology, 2016, 199(3): 705−716.

    [29]

    PARK D, FORST S. Co-regulation of motility, exoenzyme and antibiotic production by the EnvZ-OmpR-FlhDC-FliA pathway in Xenorhabdus nematophila [J]. Molecular Microbiology, 2010, 61(6): 1397−1412.

  • 期刊类型引用(1)

    1. 丁霞飞,贾宪波,林陈强,庄振宏,陈济琛. 普城沙雷氏菌ACCC 02146产灵菌红素调控基因的鉴定. 福建农业学报. 2023(04): 485-496 . 本站查看

    其他类型引用(2)

图(7)  /  表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  660
  • HTML全文浏览量:  310
  • PDF下载量:  32
  • 被引次数: 3
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-10-07
  • 修回日期:  2021-11-11
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-12-29
  • 刊出日期:  2021-12-27

目录

/

返回文章
返回