套袋对浙梨6号果实外观和内在品质的影响

曾少敏; 陈小明; 黄保平; 黄新忠; 姜翠翠

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2024.08.010

套袋对浙梨6号果实外观和内在品质的影响

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2024.08.010

曾少敏^{1, 2,},
陈小明^{1, 2},
黄保平³,
黄新忠^{1, 2},
姜翠翠^{1, 2, ,}

1.
福建省农业科学院果树研究所，福建　福州 350013
2.
福建省落叶果树工程技术研究中心，福建　福州 350013
3.
建宁县经济作物技术推广站，福建　建宁 354500

基金项目: 福建省科技计划公益类专项（2020R10280015）；福建省农业高质量发展超越“5511”协同创新工程项目（XTCXGC2021006）；泉州市科技计划项目（2022N028）；福建省种业创新与产业化工程项目（zycxny2021010）

详细信息

作者简介:
曾少敏（1987 —），男，硕士，助理研究员，主要从事果树育种与栽培技术研究，E-mail：zengshaomin1@163.com

通讯作者:
姜翠翠（1982 —），女，博士，副研究员，主要从事果树育种和栽培技术研究，E-mail：cuiliao2046@163.com

中图分类号: S661.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 40
- HTML全文浏览量: 17
- PDF下载量: 55
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-05-24
- 修回日期: 2024-07-05
- 网络出版日期: 2024-11-13
- 刊出日期: 2024-08-28

Appearance and Quality of Zheli No. 6 Pears Affected by Bagging

ZENG Shaomin^{1, 2
,},
CHEN Xiaoming^{1, 2},
HUANG Baoping³,
HUANG Xinzhong^{1, 2},
JIANG Cuicui^{1, 2
, ,}

1.
Fruit Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian　350013, China
2.
Research Centre for Engineering Technology of Fujian Deciduous Fruits, Fuzhou, Fujian　350013, China
3.
Jianning County Economic Crop Technology Extension Station, Jianning, Fujian　354500, China

摘要

摘要: 目的研究不同套袋处理对浙梨6号果实外观和内在品质性状的影响，为改善浙梨6号综合品质、提升果品价值提供参考。方法以浙梨6号为试材，设置不同果袋、不同套袋方式和不同时期套袋处理，以果实不套袋为对照，测定成熟期果实的外观和内在品质的变化情况。结果不同果袋处理果面亮度均显著高于对照（P ＜ 0.05）；套白色单层大袋果实果锈指数显著低于对照（P ＜ 0.05），可溶性固形物、可溶性总糖含量和甜度值与对照无显著差异。二次套袋果实果锈指数显著低于对照和一次套袋，可溶性固形物、可溶性总糖、可滴定酸和维生素C（Vitamin C, VC）含量与对照无显著差异，果糖、葡萄糖含量和甜度值显著高于对照和一次套袋（P ＜ 0.05）。盛花后10、20、30 d套袋，黄绿果较多（≥50%），果锈指数较低（0.471～0.600），果点直径和密度显著低于对照，而盛花后60 d套袋，全锈果较多（72.5%）；除盛花后10 d处理外，各时期套袋果实可溶性固形物、可溶性总糖、可滴定酸和VC含量均与对照无显著差异。结论套白色单层大袋对浙梨6号果实外观品质改善效果显著，同时采用“白色小蜡袋+白色单层大袋”的二次套袋方式，盛花后10～30 d为生产黄绿色果品的防锈套袋适宜期，盛花后60 d为生产全锈褐皮果品的不防锈套袋适宜期，套袋对果实内在品质无显著负面影响。
- 梨 /
- 浙梨6号 /
- 套袋 /
- 果实品质
Abstract: Objective Improvements on the appearance and fruit quality of Zheli No. 6 pear by bagging were studied. Method Zheli No. 6 pear s on the trees were covered once or twice with a variety of pouches at different times of the fruit development in a field experiment. Appearance and eating quality of the mature pears were monitored. Result The bagged fruits were significantly brighter and more shiny than the counterparts without covering (P＜0.05). The pears matured in the white single-layer large pouches had significantly lower fruit rust index (FRI) than control (P＜0.05) but no significant differences on the contents of soluble solids, total soluble sugar, and sweetness. Those being bagged twice were significantly lower on FRI than control or those being bagged only once. Nor did they differ significantly from control on the contents of soluble solids, total soluble sugar, titratable acid, and VC, but contained significantly more fructose and glucose than control or those were bagged a single time (P＜0.05). When the bagging was held 10d, 20d, and 30d after full bloom, equal to or more than half of the resulting fruits were yellowish green with few rusty streaks and spots having an FRI of 0.471-0.600 and low on latitudinal measurements and flesh density. Bagging 60d after full bloom produced 72.5% of the fruits with fully rusty-appearing peels. And, except for those bagged 10d after full bloom, no bagged pears significantly differed from control on the contents of soluble solids, total soluble sugar, titratable acid, and VC. Conclusion Bagging Zheli No. 6 pears on the tree with the white single-layer large pouches significantly affected the appearance of the matured fruits. Using the white small wax pouch in 10-30d after full bloom followed by the white single-layer large pouch for the bagging fostered bearing of yellowish green fruits. Whereas the non-rust-proof pouches for bagging once in 60d after full bloom encouraged formation of a fully rust, brown peel. Meanwhile, the appealing eating quality of Zheli No. 6 pears would basically be intact under the bagging treatments.
- Pear /
- Zheli No. 6 /
- bagging /
- fruit quality

HTML全文

图 1 不同果袋、套袋方式浙梨6号成熟果实外观

A：不套袋果实（CK）；B：白色单层大袋果实；C：黄色单层袋果实；D：外黄内白双层袋果实；E：外黄内黑双层袋果实；F：二次套袋果实。

Figure 1. Mature Zheli No. 6 pears bagged in different pouches once or twice

A: bare fruit（CK) ；B: fruit bagged in white single-layer large pouch；C: fruit bagged in yellow single-layer pouch；D: fruit bagged in outer-yellow-inner-white double-layer pouch；E: fruit bagged in outer-yellow-inner-black double-layer pouch；F: fruit bagged twice.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 不同外观类型浙梨6号的成熟果实

A：黄绿果； B：花脸果； C：全锈果。

Figure 2. Different appearance types of matured Zheli No. 6 pears

A: yellowish green fruit; B: dapple fruit; C: full-rust fruit.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 不同时期套袋浙梨6号梨果实中不同外观类型占比

不同小写同字母表示差异显著（P ＜ 0.05）。

Figure 3. Proportion of different types of Zheli No. 6 pears bagged at different times

Data with different letters indicate significant differences at P＜0.05.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 不同果袋处理浙梨6号果实的外观品质

Table 1. Appearance of Zheli No. 6 pears bagged in different pouches

处理 Treatment	L	a	b	果皮色泽 Fruit peel color	果点 Dot	果面光滑度 Degree of fruit skin smoothness	果锈指数 Fruit rust index	果锈位置 Rust location		单果质量 Weight per fruit/g	果形指数 Fruit shape index
处理 Treatment	L	a	b	果皮色泽 Fruit peel color	果点 Dot	果面光滑度 Degree of fruit skin smoothness	果锈指数 Fruit rust index	萼端 Calyx end/%	全果 Whole fruit/%	单果质量 Weight per fruit/g	果形指数 Fruit shape index
Ⅰ	63.42bc	−6.29c	36.23a	黄绿	小、密	光滑	0.743b	55	45	820.55a	0.89a
Ⅱ	62.06c	−6.44c	36.55a	黄绿	中、密	光滑	0.929a	0	100	733.16a	0.90a
Ⅲ	65.19b	−7.32c	35.54a	黄绿	小、密	光滑	0.943a	0	100	729.30a	0.91a
Ⅳ	73.63a	6.95a	28.79c	黄白	小、密	光滑	0.971a	0	100	742.68a	0.93a
CK	56.51d	−0.16b	33.20b	绿褐相间	大、密	中等	1.000a	0	100	753.53a	0.89a
同一列的不同字母表示经LSD多重比较差异显著（P ＜ 0.05）。下同。 Data with different letters on same column indicate significant differences at P＜0.05 (ANOVA Fisher’s LSD test). Same for below.

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不同果袋处理浙梨6号果实的内在品质

Table 2. Eating quality of Zheli No. 6 pears bagged in different pouches

处理 Treatment	可溶性固形物 Total soluble solids/%	可溶性总糖 Total soluble sugar/(mg·g⁻¹)	可滴定酸 Titratable acid/%	维生素C Vitamin C/ (mg·g⁻¹)	糖酸比 Ratio of soluble sugar and titratable acid	甜度值 Sweetness value	蔗糖 Sucrose/ (mg·g⁻¹)	葡萄糖 Glucose/ (mg·g⁻¹)	果糖 Fructose/ (mg·g⁻¹)	山梨醇 Sorbitol/ (mg·g⁻¹)	苹果酸 Malic acid/ (mg·g⁻¹)	柠檬酸 Citric acid/ (mg·g⁻¹)	奎尼酸 Quinic acid/ (mg·g⁻¹)	莽草酸 Shikimic acid/ (mg·g⁻¹)
Ⅰ	13.34a	133.56a	0.16d	0.046b	85.12a	130.89bc	43.22a	6.89b	39.42b	34.66b	1.24e	0.63c	0.89bc	0.66d
Ⅱ	13.86a	132.00a	0.21c	0.065a	62.12bc	126.94c	26.10 d	10.37a	45.82a	33.48b	1.55b	0.72a	0.94b	0.78b
Ⅲ	13.62a	129.87a	0.19c	0.066a	68.14b	138.83a	38.94b	9.98a	45.41a	33.58b	1.50c	0.71a	0.81d	0.74c
Ⅳ	13.56a	135.63a	0.31a	0.068a	43.89d	137.12ab	32.57c	10.11a	47.11a	37.59a	1.45d	0.67b	0.83cd	0.64e
CK	13.94a	140.32a	0.26b	0.068a	54.85cd	126.65c	45.67a	6.65b	34.61c	39.37a	1.66a	0.53d	1.11a	0.90a

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 不同套袋方式浙梨6号果实的外观品质

Table 3. Appearance of Zheli No. 6 pears bagged once or twice

处理 Treatment	L	a	b	果皮色泽 Fruit peel color	果点 Dot	果面光滑度 Degree of fruit skin smoothness	果锈指数 Fruit rust index	果锈位置 Rust location		单果质量 Weight per fruit/g	果形指数 Fruit shape index
处理 Treatment	L	a	b	果皮色泽 Fruit peel color	果点 Dot	果面光滑度 Degree of fruit skin smoothness	果锈指数 Fruit rust index	萼端 Calyx end/%	全果 Whole fruit/%	单果质量 Weight per fruit/g	果形指数 Fruit shape index
一次套袋 Single bagging	63.42a	−6.29b	36.23a	黄绿	小、密	光滑	0.743b	55	45	820.55a	0.89a
二次套袋 Twice bagging	64.17a	−5.28b	35.98a	黄绿	小、密	光滑	0.571c	85	15	778.03a	0.92a
对照CK	56.51b	−0.16a	33.20b	绿褐相间	大、密	中等	1.00a	0	100	753.53a	0.89a

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 不同套袋方式浙梨6号果实内在品质

Table 4. Eating quality of Zheli No. 6 pears bagged once or twice

处理 Treatment	可溶性固形物 Total soluble solids/ %	可溶性总糖 Total soluble sugar/ （mg·g⁻¹）	可滴定酸 Titratable acid/%	维生素C Vitamin C/ (mg·g⁻¹)	糖酸比 Ratio of soluble sugar and titratable acid	甜度值 Sweetness value	蔗糖 Sucrose/ (mg·g⁻¹)	葡萄糖 Glucose/ (mg·g⁻¹)	果糖 Fructose/ (mg·g⁻¹)	山梨醇 Sorbitol/ (mg·g⁻¹)	苹果酸 Malic (acid/ mg·g⁻¹)	柠檬酸 Citri acid/ (mg·g⁻¹)	奎尼酸 Quinic acid/ (mg·g⁻¹)	莽草酸 Shikimic acid/ (mg·g⁻¹)
一次套袋 Single bagging	13.34a	133.56b	0.16b	0.046b	85.12a	130.89b	43.22b	6.89b	39.42b	34.66b	1.24b	0.63a	0.89b	0.66c
二次套袋 Twice bagging	13.26a	147.77a	0.28a	0.063a	53.88b	138.54a	43.41b	9.19a	43.55a	31.19c	1.05c	0.45c	0.90b	0.70b
对照CK	13.94a	140.32ab	0.26a	0.068a	54.85b	126.65b	45.67a	6.65b	34.61c	39.37a	1.66a	0.53b	1.11a	0.90a

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 不同时期套袋处理浙梨6号果实的外观品质

Table 5. Appearance of Zheli No. 6 pears bagged at different times

处理 Treatment	L	a	b	果点 Dot		果面光滑度 Degree of fruit skin smoothness	单果质量 Weight per fruit/g	果形指数 Fruit shape index
处理 Treatment	L	a	b	直径 Diameter/mm	密度 Density/(个·cm⁻²)	果面光滑度 Degree of fruit skin smoothness	单果质量 Weight per fruit/g	果形指数 Fruit shape index
盛花后10 d 10 d after full-bloom	58.80a	−1.72c	33.23a	0.89d	13.28b	光滑	607.00c	0.85a
盛花后20 d 20 d after full-bloom	59.51a	−1.34c	33.67a	1.15bc	13.39b	光滑	646.33bc	0.89a
盛花后30 d 30 d after full-bloom	60.69a	−4.81 d	34.43a	1.08c	12.36b	光滑	650.77bc	0.88a
盛花后40 d 40 d after full-bloom	60.06a	−3.74cd	34.46a	1.14bc	15.57ab	光滑	649.83bc	0.90a
盛花后50 d 50 d after full-bloom	59.93a	−3.27cd	34.10a	1.21b	14.54ab	光滑	670.75b	0.86a
盛花后60 d 60 d after full-bloom	51.10c	8.25a	29.67c	0.93 d	17.63a	光滑	690.45ab	0.86a
对照 CK	54.58b	3.32b	31.07b	1.42a	18.54a	中等	737.98a	0.87a

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 不同时期套袋处理浙梨6号果实的内在品质

Table 6. Eating quality of Zheli No. 6 pears bagged at different times

处理 Treatment	可溶性固形物 Total soluble solids/%	可溶性总糖 Total soluble sugar/ (mg·g⁻¹)	可滴定酸 Titratable acid/%	维生素C Vitamin C/ (mg·g⁻¹)	糖酸比 Ratio of soluble sugar and titratable acid	甜度值 Sweetness value	蔗糖 Sucrose/ (mg·g⁻¹)	葡萄糖 Glucose/ (mg·g⁻¹)	果糖 Fructose/ (mg·g⁻¹)	山梨醇 Sorbitol/ (mg·g⁻¹)	苹果酸 Malic acid/ (mg·g⁻¹)	柠檬酸 Citric acid/ (mg·g⁻¹)	奎尼酸 Quinic acid/ (mg·g⁻¹)	莽草酸 Shikimic acid/ (mg·g⁻¹)
盛花后10 d 10 d after full-bloom	13.03a	96.61b	0.19a	0.19a	52.05b	133.95abc	33.63bc	12.64ab	44.73a	32.99ab	0.61cd	0.60b	0.19d	0.056de
盛花后20 d 20 d after full-bloom	13.25a	108.06ab	0.17a	0.18a	62.04ab	141.65ab	41.69abc	11.08b	43.81a	38.83a	1.02a	0.70a	0.31a	0.15a
盛花后30 d 30 d after full-bloom	13.43a	110.83ab	0.18a	0.23a	61.14ab	127.28bc	36.56abc	11.81b	39.83a	31.89ab	0.57d	0.47d	0.25b	0.067d
盛花后40 d 40 d after full-bloom	13.38a	107.21ab	0.20a	0.19a	53.94b	143.77ab	46.53a	13.88a	43.13a	30.12b	0.97a	0.44e	0.23bc	0.065d
盛花后50 d 50 d after full-bloom	13.42a	116.44a	0.19a	0.17a	62.80ab	147.96a	46.36a	12.43ab	45.73a	32.16ab	0.68c	0.51c	0.23bc	0.050e
盛花后60 d 60 d after full-bloom	13.32a	109.33ab	0.17a	0.17a	62.76ab	134.99abc	44.39ab	10.83b	39.71a	33.84ab	0.88b	0.40f	0.21cd	0.078c
对照 CK	13.80a	122.29a	0.17a	0.19a	71.68a	122.01c	32.82c	12.66ab	38.64a	31.78ab	0.84b	0.49d	0.29a	0.13b

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(21)

[1]	黄新忠, 曾少敏, 张长和. 沙梨新品种“新玉” 与“晚翠” 区域适应性研究初报 [J]. 中国南方果树, 2018, 47(6):92−96. HUANG X Z, ZENG S M, ZHANG C H. Preliminary report on regional adaptability of new pear varieties “Xinyu” and “Wancui” [J]. South China Fruits, 2018, 47(6): 92−96. (in Chinese)
[2]	滕元文, 沈玉英, 周先章. 砂梨果皮锈斑成因及解决对策 [J]. 中国南方果树, 2005, 34(3):52−54,56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1431.2005.03.027 TENG Y W, SHEN Y Y, ZHOU X Z. Rust spot of Pyrus pyrifolia nakai: Causes and control [J]. South China Fruits, 2005, 34(3): 52−54,56. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1431.2005.03.027
[3]	黄新忠, 张长和, 林洪龙, 等. 果实套袋对翠冠梨果锈形成的影响 [J]. 中国南方果树, 2006, 35(2):69−70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1431.2006.02.047 HUANG X Z, ZHANG C H, LIN H L, et al. Effect of Bagging on the Formation of Fruit Russet of‘Cui Guan’Pear [J]. South China Fruits, 2006, 35(2): 69−70. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1431.2006.02.047
[4]	黄春辉, 柴明良, 潘芝梅, 等. 套袋对翠冠梨果皮特征及品质的影响 [J]. 果树学报, 2007, 24(6):747−751,881. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2007.06.004 HUANG C H, CHAI M L, PAN Z M, et al. Effects of bagging on fruit skin features and quality of Cuiguan pear cultivar [J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2007, 24(6): 747−751,881. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2007.06.004
[5]	王少敏, 高华君, 张晓兵. 梨果实套袋研究进展 [J]. 中国果树, 2002, (6):47−50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8047.2002.06.023 WANG S M, GAO H J, ZHANG X B. Progress of study on bagging pear fruits [J]. China Fruits, 2002(6): 47−50. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8047.2002.06.023
[6]	李刚波, 樊继德, 赵林, 等. 套袋微环境特征及其对早熟梨果实品质的影响 [J]. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(9):1882−1890. LI G B, FAN J D, ZHAO L, et al. Changes of microenvironment in different bagging time and their effects on fruit quality of early-maturing pear [J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 31(9): 1882−1890. (in Chinese)
[7]	张振铭, 张绍铃, 乔勇进, 等. 不同果袋对砀山酥梨果实品质的影响 [J]. 果树学报, 2006, 23(4):510−514. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2006.04.005 ZHANG Z M, ZHANG S L, QIAO Y J, et al. Effect of bagging with different types of bags on fruit quality of Dangshansu pear cultivar [J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2006, 23(4): 510−514. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2006.04.005
[8]	李芳芳, 张虎平, 何子顺, 等. 套袋对‘库尔勒香梨’果实糖酸组分与香气成分的影响 [J]. 园艺学报, 2014, 41(7):1443−1450. LI F F, ZHANG H P, HE Z S, et al. Effects of bagging on soluble sugars, organic acids, and aroma compounds in Pyrus sinkiangensis ‘Korla xiangli' fruit [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2014, 41(7): 1443−1450. (in Chinese)
[9]	于强, 李玉春, 李庆余, 等. 套袋对不同梨品种果实性状的影响 [J]. 烟台果树, 2020, (3):13−16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9938.2020.03.006 YU Q, LI Y C, LI Q Y, et al. Effects of bagging on fruit characters of different pear varieties [J]. Yantai Fruits, 2020(3): 13−16. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9938.2020.03.006
[10]	王少敏, 高华君, 王永志, 等. 不同纸袋对丰水梨套袋效果比较试验 [J]. 中国果树, 2001, (2):12−14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8047.2001.02.005 WANG S M, GAO H J, WANG Y Z, et al. Comparative experiment on bagging effect of different paper bags on Fengshui pear [J]. China Fruits, 2001(2): 12−14. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8047.2001.02.005
[11]	王秀敏, 李璇, 周京一. 上海地区不同类型果袋对‘翠冠’梨绿皮栽培的影响 [J]. 中国果树, 2017, (S1):45−46,2. WANG X M, LI X, ZHOU J Y. Effects of different fruit bags on green peel cultivation of' Cuiguan' pear in Shanghai [J]. China Fruits, 2017(S1): 45−46,2. (in Chinese)
[12]	蔺经, 李晓刚, 杨青松, 等. 两种套袋方式对翠冠梨果实品质、农药残留及贮藏的影响 [J]. 江苏农业学报, 2009, 25(1):174−176. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2009.01.034 LIN J, LI X G, YANG Q S, et al. Effects of bagging mode on fruits quality, pesticides residues and storage of Cuiguan pear [J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 25(1): 174−176. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2009.01.034
[13]	王宏伟, 仇仁波, 魏树伟, 等. 套袋方式对黄金梨品质的影响 [J]. 落叶果树, 2013, 45(1):11−12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2910.2013.01.006 WANG H W, QIU R B, WEI S W, et al. Effects of bagging methods on quality of golden pear [J]. Deciduous Fruits, 2013, 45(1): 11−12. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2910.2013.01.006
[14]	李先明, 伊华林, 秦仲麒, 等. 不同时期套袋对鄂梨2号果实品质的影响 [J]. 果树学报, 2008, 25(6):924−927. LI X M, YI H L, QIN Z Q, et al. Effect of bagging in different periods on fruit quality of Eli No. 2 pear cultivar [J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2008, 25(6): 924−927. (in Chinese)
[15]	曹玉芬, 刘凤之, 胡红菊,等 . 梨种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[16]	JIA H J, HIRANO K, OKAMOTO G. Effects of fertilizer levels on tree growth and fruit quality of ‘hakuho’ peaches (Prunus persica) [J]. Engei Gakkai Zasshi, 1999, 68(3): 487−493. doi: 10.2503/jjshs.68.487
[17]	姚改芳, 张绍铃, 吴俊, 等. 10个不同系统梨品种的可溶性糖与有机酸组分含量分析[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2011, 34(5): 25−31. YAO G F, ZHANG S L, WU J, et al. Analysis of components and contents of soluble sugars and organic acids in ten cultivars of pear by high performance liquid chromatography[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2011, 34(5): 25−31. (in Chinese)
[18]	姚改芳, 张绍铃, 曹玉芬, 等. 不同栽培种梨果实中可溶性糖组分及含量特征 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(20):4229−4237. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.20.014 YAO G F, ZHANG S L, CAO Y F, et al. Characteristics of components and contents of soluble sugars in pear fruits from different species [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(20): 4229−4237. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.20.014
[19]	王涛, 冯先桔, 陈丹霞, 等. 套袋对翠冠梨果实品质和矿质营养的影响 [J]. 中国南方果树, 2010, 39(2):60−62. WANG T, FENG X J, CHEN D X, et al. Effect of bagging on fruit quality and mineral nutrition of Cuiguan pear [J]. South China Fruits, 2010, 39(2): 60−62. (in Chinese)
[20]	张振铭, 施泽斌, 张绍铃, 等. 砀山酥梨不同发育时期套袋对石细胞发育的影响 [J]. 园艺学报, 2007, 34(3):565−568. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0513-353x.2007.03.006 ZHANG Z M, SHI Z B, ZHANG S L, et al. Bagging at different developmental stages on sclereid formation in ‘dangshansu’ pear fruit [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2007, 34(3): 565−568. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0513-353x.2007.03.006
[21]	蔺经, 杨青松, 王中华, 等. 套袋对翠冠梨叶片光合特性及果实品质的影响 [J]. 江苏农业学报, 2010, 26(6):1342−1346. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2010.06.040 LIN J, YANG Q S, WANG Z H, et al. Changes of leaf photosynthesis and fruit quality of Cuiguan pears by bagging [J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 26(6): 1342−1346. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2010.06.040