• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

砒砂岩与沙复配土养分含量及质地的垂直分布特征

郭振, 徐艳, 葛磊, 王欢元

郭振, 徐艳, 葛磊, 王欢元. 砒砂岩与沙复配土养分含量及质地的垂直分布特征[J]. 福建农业学报, 2019, 34(5): 613-620. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.05.016
引用本文: 郭振, 徐艳, 葛磊, 王欢元. 砒砂岩与沙复配土养分含量及质地的垂直分布特征[J]. 福建农业学报, 2019, 34(5): 613-620. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.05.016
GUO Zhen, XU Yan, GE Lei, WANG Huan-yuan. Vertical Nutrient Distribution and Texture of Sandy Soil Added with Soft Rocks[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 34(5): 613-620. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.05.016
Citation: GUO Zhen, XU Yan, GE Lei, WANG Huan-yuan. Vertical Nutrient Distribution and Texture of Sandy Soil Added with Soft Rocks[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 34(5): 613-620. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.05.016

砒砂岩与沙复配土养分含量及质地的垂直分布特征

基金项目: 

陕西地建集团内部科研项目 DJNY2019-12

陕西地建集团内部科研项目 DJNY2018-12

陕西省土地整治重点实验室开放基金项目 2018-JC18

陕西省土地整治重点实验室开放基金项目 2019-JC07

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目 300102279503

详细信息
    作者简介:

    郭振(1992-), 男, 硕士, 助理工程师, 研究方向:土地整治及碳循环(E-mail:675334047@qq.com)

    通讯作者:

    王欢元(1981-), 男, 博士, 高级工程师, 研究方向:土壤物理学(E-mail:wanghuanyuan@aliyun.com)

  • 中图分类号: S153.6

Vertical Nutrient Distribution and Texture of Sandy Soil Added with Soft Rocks

  • 摘要:
      目的  研究不同比例砒砂岩添加对风沙土(沙)中碳氮比垂直分布规律的影响,为沙荒地改良以及复配土体地力的提升提供科学依据。
      方法  以位于陕西富平的砒砂岩与沙复配比小区为研究对象,选择砒砂岩与沙体积比分别为0:1(CK)、1:5(C1)、1:2(C2)和1:1(C3)的4个处理,分析复配土碳氮比(C/N)及其与土壤养分和质地的关系。
      结果  不同处理下土壤有机碳和全氮含量随着土层深度的增加而降低,有机碳平均值为1.45~2.70 g·kg-1且0~10 cm土层有机碳含量显著高于20~30 cm土层(P < 0.05);复配比单因素对有机碳产生显著影响,随着砒砂岩体积分数的增加,0~10 cm土层有机碳含量以C3处理最高。全氮平均值为0.28~1.31 g·kg-1,且0~10 cm土层全氮含量显著高于10~20 cm和20~30 cm土层,在0~10 cm土层中,C3处理的全氮含量显著高于其他处理,复配比和土层双因素对全氮均产生显著影响。C/N平均值为1.72~5.92,以0~10 cm最低,其值随着砒砂岩体积分数的增加而依次减小,以C3处理最为显著。硝态氮和铵态氮含量在各处理间的变化规律较为一致,平均值分别为33.56~197.00、5.51~70.02 mg·kg-1,以0~10 cm土层含量最高。砂粒含量随着土层的加深而逐渐增加,粉粒和黏粒则随着土层的加深而减少,随着砒砂岩体积分数的增加,土壤质地由砂土变为壤砂土再变为砂壤土。C/N与硝态氮和铵态氮均呈显著负相关关系,与土壤质地的颗粒组成也有一定的相关性,10~20 cm土层最为显著。
      结论  砒砂岩与沙复配比为1:1时可以促进0~10 cm表层土壤碳氮的积累,增强微生物的分解作用。
    Abstract:
      Objective  Effect of adding soft rocks to aeolian sandy soil in varied ratios on the vertical distributions of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and texture of the soil was studied for improving fertility of the wasteland.
      Method  At Fuping, Shaanxi, soft rocks were blended to the local sandy soil in different ratios, i.e., 0:1 (CK), 1:5 (C1), 1:2 (C2), and 1:1 (C3) by volume to determine the C/N ratio and texture of soil in different depths.
      Result  The organic C and total N contents decreased with depth upon the additions. The average C content ranged from 1.45 g·kg-1 to 2.70 g·kg-1, and it was significantly higher in the 0-10 cm layer than 20-30 cm layer (P < 0.05). The mixing ratio had a significant effect on C, as the soft rocks increased (i.e., C3) so was C content in the top layer. The total N ranged 0.28-1.31 g·kg-1, and that in the 0-10 cm layer significantly higher than in the deeper soils. In the top layer, C3 rendered significantly more N than other treatments. The average C/N ranged 1.72-5.92 with the lowest in the 0-10 cm layer and a decline upon increased addition of soft rocks. The varied mixing ratios did not affect the nitrate N and ammonium N contents, which ranged 33.56-197.00 mg·kg-1 and 5.51-70.02 mg·kg-1, respectively, with the top layer being the highest. Sand content in the soil gradually increased with depth, while silt and clay particles decreased. Along with the addition of soft rocks the soil texture changed from sand to loamy sand, and to sandy loam. There was a significant inversed correlation between C/N and nitrate N and ammonium N, and a correlation with the particle size distribution in soil. The correlations were most significant in the 10-20 cm soil layer.
      Conclusion  The blending ratio of soft rocks and sand at 1:1 seemed to promote the C and N accumulation in the 0-10 cm layer of soil. It also enhanced the microbial degradation in the soil.
  • 图  1   砒砂岩与沙不同复配比处理下土壤有机碳的垂直分布特征

    注:图中不同小写字母表示同一土层下不同复配比例间有显著差异(5%),大写字母表示所有处理的平均值在3个土层间存在显著差异(5%),图 23同。

    Figure  1.   Vertical distribution of organic C in soil of varied mixing ratios of soft rocks and sand

    Note:Different lowercase letters in the figure indicate the significant difference (5%) between different compounding ratios in the same soil layer, while uppercase letters indicate the significant difference (5%) between the average values of all treatments in three soil layers, The same as Fig. 2, 3.

    图  2   砒砂岩与沙不同复配比处理下土壤全氮的垂直分布特征

    Figure  2.   Vertical distribution of total N in soil of varied mixing ratios of soft rocks and sand

    图  3   砒砂岩与沙不同复配比处理下土壤碳氮比的垂直分布特征

    Figure  3.   Vertical distribution of C/N in soil of varied mixing ratios of soft rocks and sand

    表  1   各测定指标在双因素影响下的方差分析

    Table  1   Variance analysis on specific indicator under two factors

    指标
    Index
    影响因素
    Influencing factor
    平方和
    Quadratic sum
    自由度
    Free degree
    均方
    Mean square
    F
    F value
    P
    P value
    有机碳Organic carbon 复配比 2.5994 3 0.8665 3.919 0.0207
    土层 1.2635 2 0.6317 2.857 0.077
    复配比×土层 1.1151 6 0.1859 0.841 0.5511
    全氮Total nitrogen 复配比 0.9265 3 0.3088 34.221 0.0001
    土层 1.3922 2 0.6961 77.128 0.0001
    复配比×土层 0.2679 6 0.0446 4.947 0.002
    碳氮比C/N 复配比 43.0899 3 14.3633 14.006 0.0001
    土层 19.8871 2 9.9435 9.696 0.0008
    复配比×土层 7.1677 6 1.1946 1.165 0.3573
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   砒砂岩与沙不同复配比处理下土壤有效磷、速效钾、硝态氮和铵态氮的垂直分布特征

    Table  2   Vertical distribution of available phosphorus, available potassium, nitrate N and ammonium N in soil of varied mixing ratios of soft rocks and sand

    土层
    Soil layer/cm
    处理
    Treatment
    有效磷
    Available phosphorus(AP)
    /(mg·kg-1)
    速效钾
    Available potassium(AK)
    /(mg·kg-1)
    硝态氮
    Nitrate nitrogen (NO3--N)
    /(mg·kg-1)
    铵态氮
    Ammonium nitrogen(NH4+-N)
    /(mg·kg-1)
    0~10 CK 20.76±1.94b 40.95±1.27c 48.61±1.19c 10.98±2.04c
    C1 29.29±2.50a 63.93±1.88ab 57.54±2.35c 16.00±1.86bc
    C2 10.77±1.01c 50.85±0.89c 83.59±4.34b 20.81±1.65b
    C3 19.48±2.15b 72.95±1.72a 197.00±6.66a 70.02±2.31a
    10~20 CK 11.01±1.67b 45.01±1.11c 33.56±1.76c 5.51±1.05c
    C1 22.54±2.29a 73.30±1.79b 53.58±3.03bc 10.52±1.86c
    C2 8.15±1.82b 95.05±2.15a 70.07±3.72b 17.51±2.04b
    C3 9.57±2.17b 74.89±2.38b 130.45±7.59a 31.15±1.85a
    20~30 CK 14.57±1.94a 41.65±1.86c 32.53±1.72c 5.80±0.66c
    C1 9.08±1.79b 51.38±1.32ab 42.86±3.14c 12.13±1.51c
    C2 15.92±2.81a 64.64±2.44a 63.55±3.85ab 18.13±2.17b
    C3 5.41±1.26c 40.24±1.01c 81.81±4.87a 31.87±2.31a
    注:数据后同列不同小写字母表示同一土层不同处理之间差异显著(P<0.05)。表 3-4同。
    Note:The different lowercase letters in the same column under each soil layer indicate significant differences (P<0.05).The same as Table 3-4.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   砒砂岩与沙不同复配比处理下土壤质地的垂直分布特征

    Table  3   Vertical distribution on texture of soil in varied mixing ratios of soft rocks and sand

    土层
    Soil layer/cm
    处理
    Treatment
    砂粒
    Sand /%
    粉粒
    Silt/%
    黏粒
    Clay /%
    质地
    Texture
    0~10 CK 89.87±3.96a 7.68±1.48c 2.45±0.65c 砂土
    C1 76.59±4.05b 18.44±1.39b 4.97±0.85b 壤砂土
    C2 58.85±3.28c 33.13±2.05a 8.02±0.78a 壤砂土
    C3 64.2±4.81c 28.62±2.48a 7.18±1.12ab 砂壤土
    10~20 CK 93.14±4.01a 6.06±1.61b 0.80±0.04c 砂土
    C1 82.56±2.85ab 14.24±1.54ab 3.20±0.69bc 壤砂土
    C2 65.33±5.89ab 27.39±2.81ab 7.27±1.56ab 砂壤土
    C3 53.31±3.96b 37.01±2.24a 9.68±1.55a 砂壤土
    20~30 CK 99.07±4.16a 0.83±0.09b 0.10±0.02b 砂土
    C1 81.08±4.12ab 15.48±1.01a 3.43±0.25ab 壤砂土
    C2 74.19±3.11b 20.07±1.58a 5.75±1.55a 壤砂土
    C3 77.46±4.18ab 16.97±1.25a 5.57±1.15a 砂壤土
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4   砒砂岩与沙不同复配比处理下土壤碳氮比与养分元素及质地的相关性

    Table  4   Correlations among C/N, nutrients, and texture of soil in varied mixing ratios of soft rocks and sand

    土层
    Soil layer./cm
    有效磷
    AP/
    (mg·kg-1)
    速效钾
    AK/
    (mg·kg-1)
    硝态氮
    NO3--N/
    (mg·kg-1)
    铵态氮
    NH4+-N /
    (mg·kg-1)
    有机碳
    SOC/
    (g·kg-1)
    全氮
    TN/
    (g·kg-1)
    砂粒
    Sand
    /%
    粉粒
    Silt
    /%
    黏粒
    Clay
    /%
    0~10 0.2625 -0.8456 -0.9045 * -0.8820 0.6176 -0.8849 * 0.8565 -0.8441 -0.8654
    10~20 0.1393 -0.4412 -0.9999 ** -0.9997 ** 0.8653 -0.8513 0.9488 * -0.9498 * -0.9269 *
    20~30 0.2007 -0.2883 -0.9438 * -0.8652 -0.1182 -0.9687 ** 0.7639 -0.7211 -0.8726
    注:*表示P<0.05水平差异显著,**表示P<0.01水平差异极显著。
    Note:* indicates significant at P<0.05 level, and ** indicates extremely significant at P<0.01 level.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 陈涛, 常庆瑞, 刘钊, 等.耕地土壤有机质与全氮空间变异性对粒度的响应研究[J].农业机械学报, 2013, 44(10):122-129. DOI: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2013.10.020

    CHEN T, CHANG Q R, LIU Z, et al. Response of soil organic matter and total nitrogen spatial variability to grain size in cultivated land[J]. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 2013, 44(10):122-129.(in Chinese) DOI: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2013.10.020

    [2] 郭振, 李娟.砒砂岩与沙复配土体的固碳机制研究进展[J].农技服务, 2019, 36(1):109-110. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/njfw201901046

    GUO Z, LI J. Advances in carbon sequestration mechanism of soft rock and sand complex soils[J]. Agricultural Technology Services, 2019, 36(1):109-110.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/njfw201901046

    [3] 刘骞, 曾文津, 赵宇, 等.城市不同功能分区草坪绿地土壤有机碳与碱解氮垂直分布特征[J].四川林业科技, 2019, 40(1):25-29. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/sclykj201901005

    LIU Q, ZENG W J, ZHAO Y, et al. Vertical distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon and alkali nitrogen in turf greenland with different functional areas in cities[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2019, 40(1):25-29.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/sclykj201901005

    [4] 高焕平, 刘世亮, 赵颖, 等.秸秆与氮肥调节C/N比对潮土CH4、CO2和N2O排放/吸收的影响[J].土壤通报, 2019(1):157-164. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-TRTB201901024.htm

    GAO H P, LIU S L, ZHAO Y, et al. Effects of C/N ratio of straw and nitrogen fertilizer on CH4, CO2 and N2O emission/absorption in fluvo-aquic soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2019(1):157-164.(in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-TRTB201901024.htm

    [5] 王小利, 周志刚, 郭振, 等.长期施肥下黄壤稻田土壤有机碳和全氮的演变特征[J].江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(14):195-199. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jsnykx201714053

    WANG X L, ZHOU Z G, GUO Z, et al. Evolution characteristics of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in yellow paddy soil under long-term fertilization[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(14):195-199.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jsnykx201714053

    [6]

    HYVONEN R, PERSSON T, ANDERSSON S, et al. Impact of long-term nitrogen addition on carbon stocks in trees and soils in northern Europe[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2008, 89(1):121-137. DOI: 10.1007/s10533-007-9121-3

    [7] 张乐, 孙向阳, 李素艳, 等.辽宁仙人洞典型林分森林土壤碳氮分布特征[J].吉林农业大学学报, 2017, 39(2):183-188. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jlnydxxb201702009

    ZHANG L, SUN X Y, LI S Y, et al. Characteristics of Carbon and Nitrogen Distribution across Typical Forest Types in Xianrendong Nature reserve of Liaoning Province[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2017, 39(2):183-188.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jlnydxxb201702009

    [8] 赵业婷, 常庆瑞, 李志鹏, 等. 1983-2009年西安市郊区耕地土壤有机质空间特征与变化[J].农业工程学报, 2013, 29(2):132-140. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nygcxb201302019

    ZHAO Y T, CHANG Q R, LI Z P, et al. Spatial characteristics and changes of soil organic matter in cultivated land in the suburbs of Xi'an from 1983 to 2009[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(2):132-140.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nygcxb201302019

    [9]

    WANG Y Q, ZHANG X C, HUANG C Q. Spatial variability of soil total nitrogen and soil total phosphorus under different land uses in a small watershed on the loess plateau, China[J]. Geoderma, 2009, 150(1-2):141-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.01.021

    [10]

    ZHANG X Y, SUI Y Y, ZHANG X D, et al. Spatial variability of nutrient properties in black soil of Northeast China[J]. Pedosphere, 2007, 17(1):19-29. DOI: 10.1016/S1002-0160(07)60003-4

    [11] 韩霁昌, 刘彦随, 罗林涛.毛乌素沙地砒砂岩与沙快速复配成土核心技术研究[J].中国土地科学, 2012, 26(8):87-94. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8158.2012.08.014

    HAN J C, LIU Y S, LUO L T. Study on the core technology of rapidly compounding soft rock and sand in Wusu Sandy Land[J]. China Land Science, 2012, 26(8):87-94.(in Chinese) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8158.2012.08.014

    [12] 李娟, 吴林川, 李玲.砒砂岩与沙复配土的水土保持效应研究[J].西部大开发(土地开发工程研究), 2018, 3(6):35-40. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=0120181106322177

    LI J, WU L C, LI L. Study on soil and water conservation effect of soft rock and sand compound soil[J]. Western Development (Land Development Engineering Research), 2018, 3(6):35-40.(in Chinese) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=0120181106322177

    [13] 张露, 韩霁昌.砒砂岩与沙不同重构比例对表层土体储水量的影响[J].西部大开发(土地开发工程研究), 2016(4):50-53, 74. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBTG201604009.htm

    ZHANG L, HAN J C. Influence of different remodeling ratios of soft rock and sand on water storage in surface soil[J]. Western Development (Land Development Engineering Research), 2016(4):50-53, 74.(in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBTG201604009.htm

    [14] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2008.

    BAO S D. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis[M]. Beijing:China Agriculture Press, 2008.(in Chinese)

    [15]

    HOOK P B, Burke I C. Biogeochemistry in a shortgrass landscape:control by topography, soil texture, and microclimate[J]. Ecology, 2000, 81(10):2686-2703. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2686:BIASLC]2.0.CO;2

    [16] 郭航, 韩霁昌, 张扬, 等.基于拉曼光谱研究砒砂岩与沙复配土的胶结作用力[J].激光与光电子学进展, 2017, 54(11):436-442. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=jgygdzxjz201711056

    GUO H, HAN J C, ZHANG Y, et al. Study on the bonding force of soft rock and sand compound soil based on Raman spectroscopy[J]. Advances in Laser and Optoelectronics, 2017, 54(11):436-442.(in Chinese) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=jgygdzxjz201711056

    [17] 肖焊, 黄志刚, 武海涛, 等.三江平原4种典型湿地土壤碳氮分布差异和微生物特征[J].应用生态学报, 2014, 25(10):2847-2854. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb201410012

    XIAO H, HUANG Z G, WU H T, et al. Distribution of carbon and nitrogen in soils and microbial characteristics of four typical wetlands in Sanjiang Plain[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(10):2847-2854.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb201410012

图(3)  /  表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1309
  • HTML全文浏览量:  239
  • PDF下载量:  33
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-03-07
  • 修回日期:  2019-04-29
  • 刊出日期:  2019-05-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回