QuEChERS前处理结合GC-MS/MS法测定六类茶叶中15种农药残留过程中产生的基质效应研究

陈璐; 李怀平; 王顾希; 唐祥凯; 冯德建; 魏雨婷

QuEChERS前处理结合GC-MS/MS法测定六类茶叶中15种农药残留过程中产生的基质效应研究

陈璐^{1, 2,},
李怀平^{1, 2},
王顾希^{1, 2},
唐祥凯^{1, 2},
冯德建^{1, 2},
魏雨婷³

1.
中国测试技术研究院生物研究所，四川　成都　610021
2.
茶叶标准与检测技术四川省重点实验室，四川　成都　610021
3.
西昌市供排水有限责任公司；四川　西昌　615000

基金项目: 通讯作者：唐祥凯（1986 — ），男，硕士研究生，副研究员，主要从事食品质量安全研究，E-mail:460427982@qq.com基金项目：四川省重点研发项目（2020YFN0003、2020YFN0154）；四川省自然科学基金项目（2022NSFSC1775）

详细信息

作者简介:
陈璐（1991 — ），女，工程师，主要从事食品质量安全研究，E-mail：165374435@qq.com

中图分类号: TS272
计量
- 文章访问数: 16
- HTML全文浏览量: 12
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-12-19
- 修回日期: 2024-04-19
- 网络出版日期: 2024-07-10

Study on matrix effects generated during the determination of 15 pesticide residues in six types of tea using QuEChERS pre-treatment combined with Gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

CHEN Lu^{1, 2
,},
LI Huai-ping^{1, 2},
WANG Gu-xi^{1, 2},
TANG Xiang-kai^{1, 2},
FENG De-jian^{1, 2},
WEI Yu-ting³

1.
NationgalInstitute Of Measurement And Testing Technology Institute Of Biology, Chendu, Sichuan　610021, China
2.
Sichuan Provincial Key Laboratory of Tea Standards and Testing Technology, Chendu, Sichuan　610021, China
3.
Xichang Water Supply and Drainage Co., Ltd, Xichang, Sichuan,　615000, China

摘要

摘要: 目的对气相色谱-串联质谱法测定六类茶叶中15种农药残留过程中产生的基质效应进行分析，并就日常检测中常见批量样品同时处理时可采用的替代基质进行探讨。方法茶叶样品经QuEChERS前处理，配制质量浓度在0.01～032 mg·L⁻¹范围内的溶剂标准曲线和基质标准曲线，经GC-MS/MS测定后计算基质效应。结果六类茶叶中15种农药检测过程中均产生增强基质效应，其中以增强强基质效应为主，基质效应区间范围1.35%～411.58%，强中弱基质效应分别为73.33%、23.33%、3.33%。以红茶为替代基质测定15种农药时，主要以产生增强弱基质效应为主，整体区间范围为|0.62%|～|59.22%|，强中弱基质效应分别为1.33%、14.67%、84.00%；以混合茶叶为代表基质测定15种农药时，主要以产生抑制弱基质效应为主，整体区间范围为|0.09%|～|48.09%|，强中弱基质效应分别为0、13.33%、86.67%。结论茶叶样品基质复杂，在农残检测时使用基质标曲分析可降低基质效应，提高检测结果的准确度。使用混合茶叶样品作为替代基质配制基质标曲对茶叶农残进行定量分析时，可有效提高批量样品的分析效率。
- 气相色谱-串联质谱 /
- 茶叶 /
- 农药残留 /
- 基质效应 /
- 替代基质
Abstract: Objective The matrix effects generated during the determination of 15 pesticide residues in six types of tea by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was analyzed, and the alternative matrices that can be used for simultaneous processing of common batch samples in daily detection was discussed . Methods Tea samples were pre-treated with QuEChERS to prepare solvent standard curves and matrix standard curves with the mass concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 032mg/L, and then the matrix effects were calculated after samples determined by GC-MS/MS. Results The results showed that an enhanced matrix effect was generated during the determination of 15 pesticide residues in six types of tea which the strong matrix effect was the main one. The matrix effect ranged from 1.35%～411.58%, and the strong, medium, and weak matrix effects were 73.33%, 23.33%, and 3.33%, respectively. When black tea was using as an alternative matrix, an enhanced matrix effect was generated during the determination of 15 pesticide residues in six types of tea which the week matrix effect was the main one, The matrix effect ranged from 0.62%～59.22%, and the strong, medium, and weak matrix effects were1.33%, 14.67% and 84.00%. When the mix tea sample was using as an alternative matrix, a suppressed matrix effect was generated during the determination of 15 pesticide residues in six types of tea which the week matrix effect was the main one, The matrix effect ranged from 0.09%～48.09%, and the strong, medium, and weak matrix effects were 0, 13.33% and 86.67%. Conclusion The matrix effect of tea samples is complex, we can use matrix standard curve during the determination of 15 pesticide residues in six types of tea to reduce the impact of matrix effects. The mix tea sample using as an alternative matrix can improve the analysis efficiency of batch samples effectively.
- Gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry(GC-MS/MS) /
- Tea /
- Pesticide residue /
- Matrix effect(ME) /
- Alternative matrix.

HTML全文

图 2 以红茶为代表基质矫正后五类茶叶中15种农药检测过程中产生的基质效应占比

Figure 2. The proportion of matrix effects generated during the detection process of 15 pesticides in 5 types of tea with the black tea used as a representative matrix

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 以混合茶为代表基质矫正后六类茶叶中15种农药检测过程中产生的基质效应占比

Figure 3. The proportion of matrix effects generated during the detection process of 15 pesticides in 6 types of tea with the mix tea used as a representative matrix

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 15种农药名称、CAS号、色谱及质谱参数及定量限

Table 1. Chemical abstract service(CAS) number,GC-MS/MS parameters and limit of quantitation of 15 pesticide residues

序号 No.	目标物 Compound	CAS号 CAS number	保留时间 Retention time/min	母离子 Precursor ions(m/z)	子离子 Product ions(m/z)	碰撞能量 Collision energy/eV	定量限 limit of quantitation/ （mg·kg⁻¹）	线性范围 Linear range/ （mg·kg⁻¹）
1	敌敌畏 Dichlorvos	62-73-7	6.81	109.0	79.0*	5	0.05	0.01-0.32
1	敌敌畏 Dichlorvos	62-73-7	6.81	184.9	93.0	10	0.05	0.01-0.32
2	甲拌磷 Phorate	298-02-2	14.17	260.0	75.0*	5	0.01	0.01-0.32
2	甲拌磷 Phorate	298-02-2	14.17	230.9	128.9	25	0.01	0.01-0.32
3	五氯硝基苯 Pentachloronitrobenzene	82-68-8	15.32	295.0	237.0*	20	0.05	0.01-0.32
3	五氯硝基苯 Pentachloronitrobenzene	82-68-8	15.32	236.9	142.9	30	0.05	0.01-0.32
4	毒死蜱 Chlorpyrifos	2921-88-2	19.73	196.9	169.0*	15	0.05	0.01-0.32
4	毒死蜱 Chlorpyrifos	2921-88-2	19.73	198.9	171.0	15	0.05	0.01-0.32
5	马拉硫磷 Malathion	121-75-5	20.39	126.9	99.0*	5	0.05	0.01-0.32
5	马拉硫磷 Malathion	121-75-5	20.39	172.9	99.0	15	0.05	0.01-0.32
6	杀螟硫磷 Fenitrothion	122-14-5	20.42	277.0	260.0*	5	0.05	0.01-0.32
6	杀螟硫磷 Fenitrothion	122-14-5	20.42	277.0	109	20	0.05	0.01-0.32
7	甲基异柳磷 Isofenphos-methy	99675-03-3	21.44	199.0	121.0*	10	0.01	0.01-0.32
7	甲基异柳磷 Isofenphos-methy	99675-03-3	21.44	241.1	199.1	10	0.01	0.01-0.32
8	水胺硫磷 Isocarbophos	24353-61-5	21.74	135.9	108.0*	15	0.05	0.01-0.32
8	水胺硫磷 Isocarbophos	24353-61-5	21.74	135.9	69.0	30	0.05	0.01-0.32
9	腐霉利 Procymidone	32809-16-8	23.10	96.0	67.1*	10	0.05	0.01-0.32
9	腐霉利 Procymidone	32809-16-8	23.10	96.0	53.1	15	0.05	0.01-0.32
10	杀扑磷 Methidathion	950-37-8	23.11	144.9	85.0*	5	0.05	0.01-0.32
10	杀扑磷 Methidathion	950-37-8	23.11	144.9	58.1	15	0.05	0.01-0.32
11	联苯菊酯 Bifenthrin	82657-04-3	27.35	181.2	165.2*	25	0.05	0.01-0.32
11	联苯菊酯 Bifenthrin	82657-04-3	27.35	181.2	166.2	10	0.05	0.01-0.32
12	甲氰菊酯 Fenpropathrin	39515-41-8	28.34	207.9	181.0*	5	0.05	0.01-0.32
12	甲氰菊酯 Fenpropathrin	39515-41-8	28.34	264.9	210.0	10	0.05	0.01-0.32
13	氯菊酯 Permethrin	51877-74-8	29.97	183.1	168.1*	10	0.05	0.01-0.32
13	氯菊酯 Permethrin	51877-74-8	29.97	183.1	153.0	15	0.05	0.01-0.32
14	溴氰菊酯 Deltamethrin	52918-63-5	33.13	252.9	93.0*	15	0.05	0.01-0.32
14	溴氰菊酯 Deltamethrin	52918-63-5	33.13	250.7	172.0	5	0.05	0.01-0.32
15	苯醚甲环唑 Difenoconazole	119446-68-3	33.25	322.8	264.8*	15	0.05	0.01-0.32
15	苯醚甲环唑 Difenoconazole	119446-68-3	33.25	264.9	202.0	20	0.05	0.01-0.32
注：定量离子对。 the quantitative ion。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 六类茶叶中15种农药检测过程中产生的基质效应比较

Table 2. Comparison of matrix effects generated during the detection of 15 pesticide residues in 6 types of tea

农药名称 Pesticide name	基质效应 ME/%
农药名称 Pesticide name	绿茶 Green tea	红茶 Black tea	花茶 Scented tea	黑茶 Dark tea	白茶 White tea	乌龙茶 Oolong	绝对平均值 Absolute mean/%
敌敌畏 Dichlorvos	1.35	31.59	8.81	27.06	35.20	38.15	23.69
甲拌磷 Phorate	6.13	43.31	23.75	72.32	56.16	60.19	43.64
五氯硝基苯 Pentachloronitrobenzene	47.35	23.34	45.46	39.95	48.73	60.08	44.15
毒死蜱 Chlorpyrifos	57.39	48.00	56.25	33.78	66.10	75.31	56.14
马拉硫磷 Malathion	101.11	148.50	123.92	154.93	161.75	153.84	140.68
杀螟硫磷 Fenitrothion	112.99	135.59	126.29	145.96	134.13	156.16	135.19
甲基异柳磷 Isofenphos-methy	66.55	44.65	60.34	61.92	64.59	70.01	61.34
水胺硫磷 Isocarbophos	108.10	140.04	115.11	152.66	158.59	178.60	142.18
腐霉利 Procymidone	57.67	34.95	53.11	73.39	55.28	61.84	56.04
杀扑磷 Methidathion	14.51	180.82	58.92	142.15	138.94	104.98	106.72
联苯菊酯 Bifenthrin	39.66	30.69	40.75	50.40	48.68	50.76	43.49
甲氰菊酯 Fenpropathrin	76.60	75.33	81.19	95.37	94.99	88.00	85.25
氯菊酯 Permethrin	85.72	79.55	83.41	110.82	103.12	107.78	95.07
溴氰菊酯 Deltamethrin	269.31	298.67	304.64	394.83	354.78	366.68	331.49
苯醚甲环唑 Difenoconazole	211.21	391.51	279.99	411.58	344.98	381.49	336.79

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 以红茶为代表基质时五类茶叶中15种农药检测过程中产生的基质效应比较

Table 3. Comparison of matrix effects generated during the detection of 15 pesticides in 5 types of tea with the black tea used as a representative matrix

农药名称 Pesticide name	基质效应 ME/%
农药名称 Pesticide name	绿茶 Green tea	花茶 Scented tea	黑茶 Dark tea	白茶 White tea	乌龙茶 Oolong	绝对平均值 Absolute mean
敌敌畏 Dichlorvos	−22.98	−17.31	−3.45	2.75	4.99	10.29
甲拌磷 Phorate	−25.95	−13.65	20.24	8.96	11.78	16.12
五氯硝基苯 Pentachloronitrobenzene	19.47	17.93	13.46	20.58	29.79	20.25
毒死蜱 Chlorpyrifos	6.34	5.58	−9.61	12.23	18.45	10.44
马拉硫磷 Malathion	−19.07	−9.89	2.59	5.33	2.15	7.81
杀螟硫磷 Fenitrothion	−9.59	−3.95	4.40	−0.62	8.73	5.46
甲基异柳磷 Isofenphos-methy	15.14	10.84	11.93	13.78	17.53	13.85
水胺硫磷 Isocarbophos	−13.30	−10.39	5.26	7.73	16.07	10.55
腐霉利 Procymidone	16.83	13.45	28.48	15.07	19.93	18.75
杀扑磷 Methidathion	−59.22	−43.41	−13.77	−14.91	−27.01	31.66
联苯菊酯 Bifenthrin	6.87	7.70	15.09	13.76	15.36	11.75
甲氰菊酯 Fenpropathrin	0.73	3.34	11.43	11.22	7.23	6.79
氯菊酯 Permethrin	3.44	2.15	17.42	13.13	15.73	10.37
溴氰菊酯 Deltamethrin	−7.37	1.50	24.12	14.07	17.06	12.82
苯醚甲环唑 Difenoconazole	−36.68	−22.69	4.08	−9.47	−2.04	14.99

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 以混合茶为代表基质时六茶叶中15种农药检测过程中产生的基质效应比较

Table 4. Comparison of matrix effects generated during the detection of 15 pesticides in 6 types of tea with the mix tea used as a representative matrix

农药名称 Pesticide name	基质效应 ME/%
农药名称 Pesticide name	绿茶 Green tea	红茶 Black tea	花茶 Scented tea	黑茶 Dark tea	白茶 White tea	乌龙茶 Oolong	绝对平均值 Absolute mean
敌敌畏 Dichlorvos	−26.54	−4.62	−21.14	−7.91	−2.00	0.13	10.39
甲拌磷 Phorate	−31.54	−7.56	−20.18	11.15	0.73	3.33	12.41
五氯硝基苯 Pentachloronitrobenzene	−4.26	−19.86	−5.49	−9.07	−3.37	4.01	7.68
毒死蜱 Chlorpyrifos	−6.62	−12.19	−7.30	−20.63	−1.45	4.01	8.70
马拉硫磷 Malathion	−18.27	0.98	−9.00	3.60	6.37	3.16	6.90
杀螟硫磷 Fenitrothion	−13.33	−4.13	−7.92	0.09	−4.73	4.24	5.74
甲基异柳磷 Isofenphos-methy	−1.50	−14.45	−5.17	−4.24	−2.66	0.54	4.76
水胺硫磷 Isocarbophos	−28.59	−17.63	−26.18	−13.29	−11.26	−4.39	16.89
腐霉利 Procymidone	−1.23	−15.46	−4.09	8.62	−2.73	1.39	5.59
杀扑磷 Methidathion	−48.09	27.31	−27.95	9.78	8.33	−7.07	21.42
联苯菊酯 Bifenthrin	−6.75	−12.74	−6.03	0.42	−0.73	0.66	4.55
甲氰菊酯 Fenpropathrin	−5.92	−6.60	−3.48	4.08	3.88	0.15	4.02
氯菊酯 Permethrin	−13.88	−16.75	−14.96	−2.25	−5.82	−3.65	9.55
溴氰菊酯 Deltamethrin	−22.58	−16.43	−15.17	3.73	−4.66	−2.17	10.79
苯醚甲环唑 Difenoconazole	−29.29	11.68	−13.66	16.24	1.11	9.40	13.56

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 添加水平为0.10 mg·kg⁻¹时4种农药在两种定量方式下的平均回收率（n=6）

Table 5. Average recovery rates of 4 pesticides under two quantitative methods at an addition level of 0.10 mg·kg⁻¹（n=6）

茶叶种类 Tea types	标液类型 Standard liquid type	马拉硫磷 Malathion		水胺硫磷 Isocarbophos		溴氰菊酯 Deltamethrin		苯醚甲环唑 Difenoconazole
茶叶种类 Tea types	标液类型 Standard liquid type	平均回收率 Average recovery rate/%	RSD/%	平均回收率 Average recovery rate/%	RSD/%	平均回收率 Average recovery rate/%	RSD/%	平均回收率 Average recovery rate/%	RSD/%
绿茶 Green tea	绿茶基质标 Green tea substrate	114.99	3.18	114.84	2.14	112.75	2.16	109.71	2.14
绿茶 Green tea	混合茶基质标 Mixed tea substrate	107.76	4.11	96.41	2.46	93.09	1.63	105.14	3.93
花茶 Scented tea	花茶基质标 Scented tea substrate	90.47	3.46	101.03	1.57	85.54	4.95	89.7	2.46
花茶 Scented tea	混合茶基质标 Mixed tea substrate	91.9	2.51	94.55	1.83	90.55	3.10	89.77	2.68
红茶 Black tea	红茶基质标 Black tea substrate	76.57	3.10	104.14	4.71	87.78	3.33	79.19	4.31
红茶 Black tea	混合茶基质标 Mixed tea substrate	85.24	4.84	102.04	2.97	91.25	4.83	85.29	5.61
黑茶 Dark tea	黑茶基质标 Dark tea substrate	84.03	2.56	106.34	3.79	80.54	2.96	96.53	1.83
黑茶 Dark tea	混合茶基质标 Mixed tea substrate	94.83	2.85	101.44	2.11	87.11	2.49	99.48	3.11
白茶 White tea	白茶基质标 White tea substrate	78.88	3.62	98.74	3.82	107.18	5.10	85.81	4.34
白茶 White tea	混合茶基质标 Mixed tea substrate	80.58	5.12	104.62	4.15	105.03	2.61	88.65	2.77
乌龙茶 Oolong	乌龙茶基质标 Oolong substrate	86.46	3.94	107.9	3.21	80.18	2.27	75.81	3.27
乌龙茶 Oolong	混合茶基质标 Mixed tea substrate	88.6	3.81	108.47	4.19	83.23	3.15	86.41	2.68

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	马佳丽, 王晨, 陈红平, 等. 注射器内分散固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法快速测定茶叶中24种农药残留 [J]. 茶叶科学, 2021, 41(5):717−730. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2021.05.011 MA J L, WANG C, CHEN H P, et al. Rapid determination of 24 pesticide residues in tea by in-syringe dispersive solid phase extraction-ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2021, 41(5): 717−730. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2021.05.011
[2]	刘佳, 赵昌燕, 蔡滔, 等. 贵州省不同产区茶叶中7种农药的基质效应评价 [J]. 现代农药, 2023, 22(2):66−69,75. LIU J, ZHAO C Y, CAI T, et al. Matrix effect analysis of seven pesticide residues in tea from Guizhou Province [J]. Modern Agrochemicals, 2023, 22(2): 66−69,75. (in Chinese)
[3]	陈廷春, 林思思, 罗贵文, 等. 不同蔬菜品种中基质效应对5种杀虫剂农药残留检测影响的对比试验 [J]. 农业科技通讯, 2020, (9):159−162. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2020.09.052 CHEN T C, LIN S S, LUO G W, et al. Comparative experiment on the influence of matrix effect on the detection of pesticide residues of five pesticides in different vegetable varieties [J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(9): 159−162. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2020.09.052
[4]	许炳雯, 孙程鹏, 葛祥武, 等. 气相色谱-串联质谱法测定30种果蔬中61种农药的基质效应及其克服方式 [J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2021, 12(15):6068−6076. XU B W, SUN C P, GE X W, et al. Matrix effects and their countermeasures of 61 kinds of pesticides in 30 kinds of fruits and vegetables by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2021, 12(15): 6068−6076. (in Chinese)
[5]	朱作为, 张文中, 陈沙, 等. 气相色谱-三重四极杆串联质谱法测定大米、韭菜、茶叶3种基质中51种农药残留的研究 [J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2018, 9(6):1297−1307. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0381.2018.06.012 ZHU Z W, ZHANG W Z, CHEN S, et al. Determination of 51 kinds of pesticide residues in 3 kinds of substrates(rice, garlic chives and tea) by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2018, 9(6): 1297−1307. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0381.2018.06.012
[6]	刘继才, 林芳, 王建山, 等. QuEChERS-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定桑叶中64种农药残留 [J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2021, 12(3):1048−1056. LIU J C, LIN F, WANG J S, et al. Determination of 64 kinds of pesticide residues in mulberry leaves by QuEChERS combined with ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2021, 12(3): 1048−1056. (in Chinese)
[7]	何冲, 孙亚南, 王彬, 等. 水果蔬菜中多种农药残留基质效应探讨 [J]. 食品工业, 2022, 43(12):104−106. HE C, SUN Y N, WANG B, et al. Research on matrix effects of mutiple pesticede residues in africultural products [J]. The Food Industry, 2022, 43(12): 104−106. (in Chinese)
[8]	蔡振辉. QuEChERS结合GC-MS/MS检测食用菌中20种有机磷农药的基质效应 [J]. 亚热带农业研究, 2022, 18(2):136−141. CAI Z H. Matrix effect of 20 kinds of organophosphorus pesticides in edible fungi by GC-MS/MS combined with QuEChERS [J]. Subtropical Agriculture Research, 2022, 18(2): 136−141. (in Chinese)
[9]	张圆圆, 刘磊, 李娜, 等. 农药残留检测中不同蔬菜的基质效应 [J]. 农药学学报, 2019, 21(3):327−337. ZHANG Y Y, LIU L, LI N, et al. Matrix effects in pesticide residue analysis in various vegetable samples [J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2019, 21(3): 327−337. (in Chinese)
[10]	侯雪, 易盛国, 韩梅, 等. 串联质谱法检测洋葱中36种例行监测农药及其基质效应的探讨 [J]. 现代科学仪器, 2012, (4):115−118. HOU X, YI S G, HAN M, et al. Study on detection and matrix effects of 36 routine monitoring pesticides in onion by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J]. Modern Scientific Instruments, 2012(4): 115−118. (in Chinese)
[11]	靳雅楠, 魏昭, 贾红霞, 等. 农药残留检测中基质效应的研究 [J]. 食品安全导刊, 2022, (28):172−174. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0270.2022.28.spaqdk202228057 JIN Y N, WEI Z, JIA H X, et al. Study of matrix effects in pesticide residue detection [J]. China Food Safety Magazine, 2022(28): 172−174. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0270.2022.28.spaqdk202228057
[12]	梁宜品. 蔬菜农药残留检测基质效应消除方法 [J]. 现代农村科技, 2022, (8):92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5329.2022.08.062 LIANG Y P. Elimination method of matrix effect in detection of pesticide residues in vegetables [J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022(8): 92. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5329.2022.08.062
[13]	鲍忠赞, 邓昭浦. 气相色谱法检测果蔬中30种有机磷类农药残留的基质效应 [J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(20):152−156. BAO Z Z, DENG Z P. Matrix effects on GC determination of 30 organophosphorus pesticides residues in fruits and vegetables [J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 58(20): 152−156. (in Chinese)
[14]	封利会, 王硕, 安阳, 等. 分散固相萃取-气相色谱串联质谱法测定花类代用茶中的48种农药残留 [J]. 食品科技, 2021, 46(5):265−271. FENG L H, WANG S, AN Y, et al. Determination of 48 pesticides in flower substitute tea by dispersive solid-phase extraction and GC-MS/MS [J]. Food Science and Technology, 2021, 46(5): 265−271. (in Chinese)
[15]	黄松, 宋安华, 陈穗, 等. QuEChERS-气相色谱-串联质谱法测定油麦菜中农药多残留的基质效应 [J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2019, 10(12):3863−3868. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0381.2019.12.038 HUANG S, SONG A H, CHEN S, et al. Determination of matrix effects of pesticide multi-residues in lettuces by QuEChERS-gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2019, 10(12): 3863−3868. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0381.2019.12.038
[16]	许洋, 叶善蓉, 唐祥凯, 等. 分散固相萃取-气相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定稻谷中三种烯虫酯类保幼激素类似物残留 [J]. 中国测试, 2023, 49(1):57−62. XU Y, YE S R, TANG X K, et al. Simultaneous determination of three methoprene juvenile hormone analogues in paddy by dispersive solid-phase extraction combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [J]. China Measurement & Test, 2023, 49(1): 57−62. (in Chinese)
[17]	罗小娇, 魏新琦, 田翠, 等. 基于QuEChERS-气相色谱串联质谱法的43种农药残留基质效应研究 [J]. 现代农业科技, 2023, (7):85−87,90. LUO X J, WEI X Q, TIAN C, et al. Matrix effect of 43 pesticide residues based on QuEChERS-gas ChromatographyTandem mass spectrometry [J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023(7): 85−87,90. (in Chinese)
[18]	易盛国, 侯雪, 韩梅, 等. 气相色谱-串联质谱法检测蔬菜农药残留基质效应与基质分类的研究 [J]. 西南农业学报, 2012, 25(2):537−543. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2012.02.038 YI S G, HOU X, HAN M, et al. Study on matrix effects and matrix classification of pesticide residues in vegetable by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 25(2): 537−543. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2012.02.038
[19]	方海仙, 耿慧春, 梅文泉, 等. 气相色谱法测定农产品中农药残留的基质效应研究 [J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2018, 9(14):3770−3779. FANG H X, GENG H C, MEI W Q, et al. Study on matrix effect of determination of pesticide residues in agricultural products by gas chromatography [J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2018, 9(14): 3770−3779. (in Chinese)
[20]	鲍忠赞. 气相色谱法探究果蔬中有机氯和拟除虫菊酯类农药残留的基质效应 [J]. 农药, 2018, 57(12):890−894. BAO Z Z. Matrix effects of organochlorine and pyrethroid pesticides in fruits and vegetables using gas chromatography [J]. Agrochemicals, 2018, 57(12): 890−894. (in Chinese)