• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

喀斯特山地不同混农林模式的土壤入渗特征及模拟

Characteristics and Simulations of Soil Infiltration in Agroforestry on Karst Mountains

  • 摘要:
      目的  明确喀斯特山地混农林模式的土壤入渗特征及混农林业对土壤入渗的影响。
      方法  通过田间试验,以单作经济林模式为对照,对林药、林粮、林草模式的入渗特征及其影响因子进行分析,并用4种常用的入渗模型对其过程进行拟合。
      结果  ① 3种混农林模式的初始入渗率、稳定入渗率、平均入渗率及入渗总量总体优于对照,并随土层的增加而降低;依据入渗过程曲线,将入渗过程按入渗历时(t)分为3个阶段:迅速降低阶段(t≤10 min)、缓慢降低阶段(10 min<t≤40 min)和趋于稳定阶段(t>40 mim)。② 从各模式综合得分来看,林药模式(0.405)得分最高,入渗能力最好,其次是林草模式(0.357),林粮模式(0.209) 尽管优于对照(0.175),但与对照差异较小,表明林药模式与林草模式的保水固土效应比林粮模式更佳。③ 土壤入渗性能与理化性质的相关性分析显示:土壤容重、总孔隙度、非毛管孔隙度分别与入渗性能呈极显著负相关(P<0.01)、极显著正相关(P<0.01)、显著正相关(P<0.05),是影响土壤入渗性能的主导因子。④ 从R2的均值来看,Philip模型(0.783)、Kostiakov模型(0.942)对各模式的拟合效果较差,而Horton模型(0.977)与通用经验模型(0.976)拟合效果较好。
      结论  各混农林模式通过影响土壤孔隙度及容重改善土壤入渗,但改善效果有差异,其中林药模式对土壤入渗的影响最大,入渗能力最强,林草模式次之,其入渗过程可用Horton模型及通用经验模型进行描述。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  Characteristics of soil infiltration in agroforestry on karst mountains were studied, and their infiltration patterns fitted to simulation models.
      Method  Through experiments in the field, the soil infiltration characteristics and factors affecting agroforestry of forest+medicinal herb, forest+grain crop, and forest+grass types were analyzed by comparing with a monocultural economic forest setting. The infiltration patterns were entered in 4 commonly applied mathematical models for best fitting.
      Result  ① The initial, stable and average infiltration rates as well as the total infiltration amounts of the 3 agroforestry types were higher than those of the monocultural forestry. They decreased in the soil layers of increasing depth. The infiltration curves showed 3 distinctive stages with varied durations (t), i.e., rapid reduction phase (t≤10 min), slow reduction phase (10 min<t≤40 min), and stabilization phase (t>40 min). ② The forest+medicinal herb type agroforestry had the highest comprehensive performance score of 0.405 with the greatest infiltration capacity among all. It was followed by forest+grass with a score of 0.357, and forest+grain of 0.209. Since forest+grain scored higher than control (0.175) but not significantly, only the other two cultivation types were considered more effective on water-retention and soil-fixation. ③ A significant inverse correlation on the infiltration performance was observed with the soil bulk density (P<0.01), an extremely significant correlation with the total porosity (P<0.01), and a significant correlation with the non-capillary porosity (P<0.05). ④ The mean R2 was 0.783 with the Philip model, 0.942 with the Kostiakov model, whereas 0.977 with the Horton model, and 0.976 with the general empirical model, indicating the later two models fitting the infiltration characteristics of all agroforesrty types better.
      Conclusion  All 3 tested agroforestry types improved the soil infiltration to varying extents by affecting the soil porosity and bulk density on karst mountains. The agroforestry of forest+medicinal herb type appeared to provide the greatest impact on soil infiltration, followed by forest+grass, and the infiltration pattern could best be described by the Horton or the general empirical model.

     

/

返回文章
返回