• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

甜瓜实时荧光定量PCR分析中内参基因的筛选

Reference Gene Selection for RT-qPCR Analysis on Cucumis melo

  • 摘要:
      目的  筛选可分别在甜瓜不同组织器官和不同胁迫处理下稳定表达的内参基因,用于对靶基因表达量的实时荧光定量分析,保证相关试验的准确性及可靠性。
      方法  以甜瓜品种新银辉为试验材料,通过实时荧光定量PCR技术分析18s rRNATUAEF1aActin1Actin2Actin3Actin4CYCUBI-ep共9个候选内参基因在甜瓜不同组织器官及不同胁迫处理下的表达稳定性,包括甜瓜根、叶、种子和果实4种不同组织材料,以及水分胁迫、肉桂酸胁迫、盐碱胁迫和ABA胁迫4种处理。同时使用Best-Keeper、Norm Finder和ge Norm软件对9个候选内参基因进行稳定性分析。
      结果  对不同组织器官而言,Best-Keeper评估排名前5的内参基因依次为CYC18s rRNAUBI-epEF1aTUA;Norm Finder计算排名前5的内参基因依次为EF1aUBI-epActin4CYCActin3;ge Norm分析排名前5的基因依次为Actin4=Actin3Actin1EF1aUBI-ep。不同胁迫处理中,Best-Keeper计算排名前5的基因依次为18s rRNAActin3Actin4EF1aUBI-ep;Norm Finder分析排名前5的基因依次为EF1aUBI-epActin4CYC18s rRNA;ge Norm分析排名前5的基因依次为EF1a=UBI-epActin4CYCActin1。总体而言EF1a在不同组织器官和不同胁迫处理中的综合排名均较为稳定;Actin4Actin3Actin1EF1a是不同组织器官中较为稳定的内参基因组合;EF1aUBI-ep是4种胁迫条件下较稳定的内参基因组合。
      结论  EF1a在甜瓜不同组织器官及不同胁迫条件下均可稳定表达,是较为合适的内参基因;同时可通过设置双内参基因进一步降低试验误差。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  In search for internal reference genes of Cucumis melo L. that could stably express in different tissues and under stress conditions to warrant accuracy and reliability of the RT-qPCR analysis on target gene expression.
      Method   Expression stabilities of 9 candidate genes, 18srRNA, TUA, EF1a, Actin1, Actin2, Actin3, Actin4, CYC, and UBI-ep, from the roots, leaves, seeds, and fruits of Xinyinhui melon being treated by water, cinnamic acid, saline alkali or ABA were determined by RT-qPCR and analyzed using the BestKeeper, NormFinder, and geNorm software.
      Result   In different tissues, the top 5 choice genes identified by BestKeeper ranked as CYC18s rRNAUBI-epEF1aTUA, those by NormFinder EF1aUBIepActin4CYCActin3, and those by geNorm Actin4=Actin3Actin1EF1aUBI-ep. Under various stresses, they were 18s rRNAActin3Actin4EF1aUBI-ep as ranked by BestKeeper, EF1aUBI-epActin4CYC18s rRNA by NormFinder, and EF1a=UBI-epActin4CYCActin by geNorm. Overall, EF1a appeared to be most stable among the 9 genes. Insofar as variety of tissues is concerned, Actin4, Actin3, Actin1, and EF1a were more stable than the others; and, under stress, EF1a and UBI-ep tended to be superior.
      Conclusion   Stably expressed in the tissues under the stresses as tested, EF1a was selected as the reference gene for studies on C. melo to reduce experimental errors. To further ensure accuracy, application of dual reference genes in RT-qPCR analysis might be considered.

     

/

返回文章
返回