• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

有机无机肥配施对香蕉田土壤细菌群落数量和结构的影响

Response of Bacterial Community in Soil of Banana Plantation to Combined Use of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers

  • 摘要:
      目的  探明化肥减量配施有机肥对香蕉土壤细菌群落结构特征的影响。
      方法  设计5个不同施肥处理:不施肥处理(CK,T1);25%化肥配施有机肥(T2);50%化肥配施有机肥(T3);100%化肥(100% CF,T4)和50%化肥(50% CF,T5)。采用Illumina MiSeq高通量测序平台,对土壤细菌16S rRNA基因保守区进行测序,并对不同施肥处理下土壤细菌群落数量、结构和多样性的差异进行生物信息学分析。
      结果  T1、T2、T3、T4和T5处理的OTUs数分别是30、33、31、34、31个。不同处理中,优势菌群所占的比例各不相同。T3处理提高了土壤中有益菌变形杆菌门(Proteobacteria)和酸杆菌门(Acidobacteria)的相对丰度。各处理土壤细菌的Shannon指数大小顺序为:T3>T5>T2>T1>T4。和单施50% CF(T5)化肥相比,50% CF配施有机肥处理(T3)提高了土壤细菌多样性。与T5处理相比,T2处理的多样性降低,说明化肥用量过低不利于土壤多样性的提高。T4处理的微生物多样性最低,表明过量的化肥施入降低了土壤微生物多样性。主坐标分析和热图分析结果表明,不同处理细菌群落结构、相对丰度和优势菌群发生了明显的变化。
      结论  与单施化肥相比,合理的有机无机配施能够提高土壤细菌多样性、改善土壤细菌群落结构。减氮50%配施有机肥(T3)处理不仅减少了氮肥施用量,而且增加了土壤有益细菌的相对丰度和土壤细菌多样性,有利于土壤生物肥力的提高。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  Effects of combined application of organic and chemical fertilizers on the bacterial community in soil of banana plantations were studied.
      Method   Various proportions of chemical fertilizer combined with an organic fertilizer, as well as all or reduced chemical fertilizer, were mixed in the soil from a banana plantation to determine the effect of the applications on the bacterial community in soil. The treatments included the uses of no fertilizer as control (T1), 25% chemical fertilizer (T2), 50% chemical fertilizer (T3), 100% chemical fertilizer (T4), and 50% reduced chemical fertilizer without organic fertilizer (T5). 16S rRNA genes of the bacteria were analyzed by Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing. A bioinformatic analysis was performed to determine the structure, abundance, and diversity of the bacterial communities in soil under treatments.
      Result   The OTUs of the T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 treatments were 30, 33, 31, 34, and 31, respectively. The proportion of beneficial bacteria in the soils varied by the treatments. The relative abundances of beneficial proteobacteria and acidobacteria were increased by the treatment of T3. The Shannon index of the bacteria in soil under different treatments ranked as T3>T5>T2>T1>T4. In comparison to T5, T3 improved and T2 reduced the soil bacterial diversity indicating a disadvantage of the reduced use of chemical fertilizer. However, the lowest diversity was observed under T4 which showed excessive chemical fertilization to be detrimental, nonetheless. The PCoA and heat map analyses revealed significant changes on the bacterial compositions, relative abundance, and beneficial bacteria in the soil by the treatments.
      Conclusion   Comparing to the use of chemical fertilizer alone, appropriate combination of organic and inorganic fertilizers effectively improved the bacterial diversity and composition in soil. A 50% reduction of chemical fertilizer usage coupled with organic fertilizer (T3) could not only conserve the chemical fertilizer, but also enhance the relative abundances of beneficial bacteria and bacterial diversity resulting in an improved soil fertility.

     

/

返回文章
返回