• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

农业废弃物戈尔膜发酵过程可培养真菌种群的生态学特性

Ecology of Culturable Fungal Community in a GORE Cover Membrane System for Composting Agricultural Waste

  • 摘要:
      目的  评估农业废弃物戈尔膜发酵过程中的真菌种群随时间和空间的变化规律,为农业废弃物的资源化利用和戈尔膜发酵效果评价提供理论依据。
      方法  以农业废弃物戈尔膜发酵槽物料为研究对象,监测发酵过程物料的温度变化,并通过时间和空间格局采样,分离鉴定物料中的真菌种类及数量,分析发酵过程中的真菌种群数量分布、空间分布型指数、多样性指数和生态位特征等参数。
      结果  发酵物料的温度监测表明,第2~16天的平均温度为55.27~74.64 ℃,定义为高温期;第17~27天的平均温度为41.26~50.64 ℃,定义为低温期。从72份物料样本中共分离鉴定出5种真菌,分别为沃尔夫被孢霉(Mortierella walfii)、青霉菌(Penicullium sp.)、烟曲霉(Aspergillus fumigatus)、棘曲霉(A. spinosus)和土曲霉(A. terreus)。从空间分布上看,烟曲霉在物料浅层和深层的种群数量均较多,分别为1.13×105 CFU·g−1和1.47×105 CFU·g−1;而棘曲霉在物料浅层和深层的种群数量均最少,分别为4.90×103 CFU·g−1和1.56×103 CFU·g−1,说明烟曲霉适宜在该物料中生长,而棘曲霉则不适宜。从发酵时间看,发酵前期 (3~12 d)的总菌量在4.10×104 ~1.30×105 CFU·g−1,发酵后期(17~27 d)的总菌量在9.35×103~2.63×104CFU·g−1。发酵过程中真菌种群呈现明显的差异性,且空间分布型为聚集分布,烟曲霉在物料中生存适应性最强,但竞争能力较弱或不存在竞争。
      结论  农业废弃物戈尔膜发酵过程中的可培养真菌的数量在不同时间和空间上均存在明显的差异,其空间分布型为聚集分布。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  Temporal and spatial characteristics of the culturable fungal community in a GORE cover membrane system (GCMS) for composting agricultural waste were analyzed to evaluate and enhance the utilization of the treatment system.
      Methods  In a GCMS tank fermentation on agriculture waste material, temperature was continuously monitored, and varied temporal and spatial samples collected for microbial determination. Culturable fungi in the system were isolated, identified, and counted for analyzing and calculating spatial distribution pattern index, diversity index, and ecological niche characteristics.
      Results  The average temperature of the composting material in the tank was 55.27-74.64 ℃ from the 2nd to the 16th day, which was defined as the high temperature period. In the low temperature period from the 17th to the 27th day, the average temperature was 41.26-50.64 ℃. From 72 specimens, 5 species of fungi, i.e., Mortierella walfii, Penicullium sp., Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus spinosus, and Aspergillus terreus, were isolated and identified. Spatially, the population of A. fumigatus was the largest in both shallow and deep layers of the waste material with the counts of 1.13×105 CFU·g−1 and 1.47×105 CFU·g−1, respectively. Whereas A. aculeatus was the least in the same areas with the counts of 4.90×103 CFU·g−1 and 1.56×103 CFU·g−1, respectively. It indicated differentiated growth adaptabilities of the two fungal populations. Temporally, the total fungal counts were between 4.10×104 CFU·g−1 and 1.30×105 CFU·g−1 in the pre-fermentation period from the 3rd to the 12th day, and between 9.35×103 CFU·g−1 and 2.63×104CFU·g−1 in the post-fermentation period from the 17th to the 27th day. It appeared that the fungal community in the compost changed significantly during the fermentation process with a largely aggregated spatial distribution. A. fumigatus displayed the strongest growth adaptability under GCMS, even though it could be weak in competing with others, or simply because of a lack of competitive counterparts within the system.
      Conclusion   The count of culturable fungi in GCMS differed significantly in different periods and locations. The spatial distribution of the fungal populations followed an aggregated pattern.

     

/

返回文章
返回