• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

脲酶/硝化抑制剂调控生物炭改良酸化土壤的硝化进程

Urease and nitrification inhibitors regulate the nitrification process in biochar-amended acidified soils

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨生物炭与脲酶/硝化抑制剂联合应用对酸化土壤改良及氮素硝化过程的综合效应,为生物炭改良酸化菜地土壤的氮素管理提供科学依据。
    方法 以酸化菜地土壤为研究对象,采用室内恒温培养试验,研究杏鲍菇渣生物炭、脲酶抑制剂N-丁基硫代磷酰三胺(NBPT)及硝化抑制剂3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐(DMPP)单施与配施对土壤铵态氮、硝态氮、无机氮含量及表观硝化率、硝化抑制率、pH值的影响。
    结果 与单施尿素相比,尿素配施抑制剂可提高酸化土壤铵态氮含量,降低硝态氮含量,培养终期土壤pH值提高0.03~0.45个单位,但仅能缓解施氮导致的土壤酸化加剧;而配施生物炭后,终期土壤pH值显著提高0.99~1.10个单位(P<0.05),酸化改良效果显著;培养28d时土壤表观硝化率也显著提高13.53%~52.48%(P<0.05),增加了土壤氮素淋失风险。与尿素配施生物炭相比,生物炭与抑制剂联合应用可在提高土壤pH值的同时有效调控土壤氮素转化,含DMPP处理在培养前42d硝化抑制率仍为正值,其中生物炭与双抑制剂配施处理的硝化抑制率最高。
    结论 生物炭与抑制剂联合应用能有效提高酸化土壤pH值并调控土壤氮素转化,以生物炭与脲酶-硝化双抑制剂联合应用效果最佳。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective The combined effects of biochar and urease/nitrification inhibitors on soil acidification and nitrification were studied, to provide a theoretical basis for the amelioration of acidified soils with biochar.
    Methods A laboratory soil incubation experiment was carried out. An acidic vegetable soil selected from a long-term over-fertilized vegetable production field was used as the research object. The biochar derived from spent mushroom substrate of Pleurotus eryngii cultivation, combined with urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) and/or nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazol-phosphate (DMPP) were added to the soils with urea application, to investigate the effects of their combined application on the contentsof soil ammonium nitrogen (AN), nitrate nitrogen(NN), inorganic nitrogen (IN), as well as apparent nitrification rate (ANR), nitrification inhibition rate (NIR) and pH value.
    Results In acidified soil, compared with urea applied alone, the AN contents were increased while the NN contents were decreased in the treatments of urea combined with nitrogen inhibitors, and the soil pH values were increased by 0.03–0.45 units at the end of incubation stage., whereas soil acidification induced by nitrogen application can only be alleviated by inhibitors. In contrast, the final soil pH values were significantly increased by 0.99–1.10 units (P < 0.05) with biochars applicaiton, and obvious ameliorative effects on acidified soil are achieved, the ANR was also increased significantly by 13.53%–52.48% (P < 0.05) after 28 days of incubation, raising the risk of soil nitrogen loss. Compared with urea combined with biochar, the soil pH value was elevated when co-application of biochar with inhibitors while modulating soil nitrogen transformation. The NIR of treatments containing DMPP remained positive value in the first 42 days of incubation, and the highest NIR was achieved in the treat of biochar with two inhibitors.
    Conclusion The pH value was effectively increased while soil nitrogen transformation was regulated by the co-application of biochar with nitrogen inhibitors, among which the best effect was found in the treatment of combined application of biochar with urease/nitrification inhibitors.

     

/

返回文章
返回