• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

栽培基质改良土壤对太子参产量和根际土壤真菌群落结构的影响

肖荣凤, 陈燕萍, 郑雪芳, 郑梅霞, 袁小坦, 刘波, 朱育菁, 王阶平

肖荣凤,陈燕萍,郑雪芳,等. 栽培基质改良土壤对太子参产量和根际土壤真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 福建农业学报,2025,X(2) :1−10.
引用本文: 肖荣凤,陈燕萍,郑雪芳,等. 栽培基质改良土壤对太子参产量和根际土壤真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 福建农业学报,2025,X(2) :1−10.
XIAO R F,CHEN Y P,ZHENG X F,et al. Ginseng Yield and Rhizosphere Fungal Community of Pseudostellaria heterophylla Grown on Soil Modified with Culture Substrate[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2025,X(2) :1−10.
Citation: XIAO R F,CHEN Y P,ZHENG X F,et al. Ginseng Yield and Rhizosphere Fungal Community of Pseudostellaria heterophylla Grown on Soil Modified with Culture Substrate[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2025,X(2) :1−10.

栽培基质改良土壤对太子参产量和根际土壤真菌群落结构的影响

基金项目: 福建省科技计划公益类专项(2022R1034007);福建省农业高质量发展超越“5511”协同创新工程项目(XTCXGC2021019)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    肖荣凤(1977 —),女,研究员,主要从事植物病理学研究,E-mail:xrfxiao@163.com

    通讯作者:

    朱育菁(1972 —),女,研究员,主要从事微生物学研究,E-mail:zyjingfz@163.com

    王阶平(1974 —),男,研究员,主要从事分子生物学研究,E-mail:wangjieping2011@163.com

  • 中图分类号: S156

Ginseng Yield and Rhizosphere Fungal Community of Pseudostellaria heterophylla Grown on Soil Modified with Culture Substrate

  • 摘要:
    目的 

    探明栽培基质改良土壤对太子参产量和根际土壤真菌群落的影响,为探索太子参可持续的栽培模式提供理论基础。

    方法 

    调查栽培基质改良对不同类型田块太子参根腐病发病率和产量的影响;利用高通量测序研究栽培基质改良对太子参根际土壤真菌群落多样性和结构组成的影响,并分析根腐病发病率、产量与根际土壤真菌群落之间的关联性。

    结果 

    田间调查结果显示,栽培基质处理组比对照组的发病率降低4.84%~7.69%,产量提高39.00%~109.31%,且对山地的改良效果最佳。太子参出苗期和膨大期的对照组根际土壤真菌丰富度高于基质处理组,但多样性无显著差异;而采收期基质处理组根际土壤真菌的丰富度升高,但多样性降低。基质处理组和对照组的子囊菌门(Ascomycota)和担子菌门(Basidiomycota)相对丰度均在85%以上,为优势真菌门。基质处理组的优势属为锥毛壳属(Coniochaeta)、假丝酵母菌属(Candida、Gibellulopsis和青霉属(Penicillium);而对照组的优势属为Saitozyma、亚隔孢壳属(Didymella镰刀菌属(Fusarium)和附球菌属(Epicoccum)。镰刀菌属在采收期对照组根际土壤的丰度显著升高,与根腐病发病率呈正相关;太子参产量与Gibellulopsis的丰度呈正相关、与镰刀菌属的丰度呈负相关。

    结论 

    采用栽培基质替换太子参根围部分原土进行连作地块的土壤改良,能够降低根腐病的发病率并提高太子参产量,也能够调节根际土壤真菌的群落结构和多样性,增加有益菌的丰度,降低病原菌的丰度。

    Abstract:
    Objective 

    Effects of adding culture substrate in soil on the yield of ginseng roots and fungal community in the Pseudostellaria heterophylla rhizosphere were studied.

    Methods 

    Root rot disease incidence (DI) and crop yield of P. heterophylla plants cultivated in different type of fields using substrate to modify the ground soil were monitored. Diversity and structure of the fungal community in the rhizosphere at different plant growth stages were analyzed by high-throughput sequencing. A correlation study was conducted between the collected data.

    Results 

    The DI was reduced by 4.84-7.69% and root yield increased by 39.00-109.31% on the ginseng plants grown in the fields by the substrate addition in soil over control. The greatest effects were observed in the soil on hilly lands. At the ginseng seedling and expanding stages, the rhizosphere fungal community under treatments was lowered in richness but not significantly changed in diversity. At the harvest stage, on the other hand, the treatments increased the richness and reduced the diversity. In all rhizosphere soils, Ascomycota and Basidiomycota were the dominant microbes with a relative abundance greater than 85%. At genus level, Coniochaeta, Candida, Gibellulopsis, and Penicillium were predominant in the treatment soils, while Saitozyma, Didymella, Fusarium, and Epicoccum were dominant at the control sites. At harvest, the relative abundance of Fusarium rose significantly in the control soils and positively correlated with DI. The root yield of P. heterophylla plants positively correlated with the abundance of Gibellulopsis but negatively with that of Fusarium.

    Conclusion 

    By partially replacing rhizosphere soils with culture substrate at different types of fields of continuous cropping P. heterophylla, improvements on DI, root yield as well as fungal community structure and diversity were realized.

  • 图  1   太子参块根的根腐病症状

    a-c: 根腐病原菌侵染的块根;d: 健康块根。

    Figure  1.   Symptoms of root rot disease on P. heterophylla roots

    a-c: Root rot pathogen-infected roots; d: healthy roots.

    图  2   3个试验地块的太子参根腐病发病率(A)和产量(B)

    同一试验地块的不同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05)。T:基质处理组;C:对照组。

    Figure  2.   DI (A) and yield (B) of P. heterophylla plants at three test fields

    Data with different lowercase letters on same test field indicate significant difference (P<0.05).

    图  3   太子参根际土壤中真菌群落在门水平上的相对丰度

    T3、T5和T7为基质处理组,C3、C5和C7为对照组。下同。

    Figure  3.   Relative abundance of fungal community at phylum level in P. heterophylla rhizosphere

    T3, T5, and T7: treatment groups; C3, C5, and C7: control groups. Same for below.

    图  4   太子参根际土壤中真菌优势差异菌属的相对丰度

    同属物种的不同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05)。

    Figure  4.   Relative abundance of dominant differential fungi at genus level in P. heterophylla rhizosphere

    Data with different lowercase letters on same gene indicate significant difference (P<0.05).

    图  5   太子参根际土壤真菌群落在属水平上的Heatmap图分析

    横向和纵向分别为各样本和各分类单元的聚类结果,红色和蓝色分别代表在对应样本中丰度较高和较低的属。

    Figure  5.   Heatmap on fungal community at genus level in P. heterophylla rhizosphere

    Clustering of samples is shown on x-axis and that of taxonomic units, on y-axis; samples of high abundance shown in red color and those of low abundance, in blue.

    图  6   根腐病发病率、产量与根际优势真菌在属水平上的相关性分析

    Figure  6.   Correlations between DI, root yield, and dominant fungi at genus level in P. heterophylla rhizosphere

    *:P<0.05;**:P<0.01;***:P<0.001。

    表  1   不同地块土壤理化性质

    Table  1   Physicochemical properties of soils at different types of fields

    试验地块
    Test field
    全氮
    Total N/%
    全磷
    Total P/(g·kg−1
    全钾
    Total K/(g·kg−1
    有机质
    organic matter/(g·kg−1
    酸碱度
    pH
    HL 0.06±0.01 b 0.45±16.05 c 10.76± 0.77 b 8.39±0.12 b 5.18±0.11 a
    FX 0.07±0.01 b 0.78±13.32 b 14.42± 0.86 a 8.90±0.44 b 4.07±0.07 b
    JT 0.14±0.00 a 1.21±36.06 a 14.08± 1.07 a 17.37±0.46 a 5.38±0.13 a
    同列不同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05)。HL、FX和JT分别代表桦岭村、富溪村和际头村试验地。下同。
    Data with different lowercase letters on same column indicate significant difference (P<0.05). HL, FX, and JT refer to test fields at Hualing, Fuxi, and Jitou Villages, respectively. Same for below.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   太子参根际土壤真菌群落Alpha多样性指数

    Table  2   Alpha diversity of fungal communities in P. heterophylla rhizosphere

    取样时间Sampling time 样品编号Sample group 丰富度指数Richness index 多样性指数Diversity index 覆盖度Coverage
    Sobs Chao1 Simpson Shannon Coverage
    出苗期 T3 433.33±39.82 b 506.72±52.79 a 0.12±0.02 a 3.14±0.18 a 0.998±0.000 a
    Seedling stage C3 607.33±32.68 a 658.19±19.23 a 0.11±0.06 a 3.66±0.43 a 0.998±0.000 a
    膨大期 T5 386.33±29.59 b 608.16±53.87 a 0.14±0.05 a 2.88±0.25 a 0.997±0.000 a
    Expanding period C5 514.33±46.27 a 607.33±70.91 a 0.11±0.02 a 3.52±0.11 a 0.998±0.001 a
    采收期 T7 447.33±31.42 a 614.59±18.27 a 0.33±0.02 a 2.29±0.09 b 0.997±0.000 a
    Harvest period C7 351.67±17.70 a 458.68±45.84 b 0.14±0.00 b 2.80±0.04 a 0.997±0.000 a
    同一取样时间同列不同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05)。
    Data with different lowercase letters on same column at same sampling time indicate significant difference (P< 0.05).
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典-一部:2020年版[M]. 北京:中国医药科技出版社,2020.
    [2] 吴红淼,林文雄. 药用植物连作障碍研究评述和发展透视[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文) ,2020,28(6) :775−793.

    WU H M,LIN W X. A commentary and development perspective on the consecutive monoculture problems of medicinal plants[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2020,28(6) :775−793. (in Chinese)

    [3]

    WU H M,QIN X J,WANG J Y,et al. Rhizosphere responses to environmental conditions in Radix pseudostellariae under continuous monoculture regimes[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment,2019,270:19–31.

    [4]

    CHEN J,WU L K,XIAO Z G,et al. Assessment of the diversity of Pseudomonas spp. and Fusarium spp. in Radix pseudostellariae rhizosphere under monoculture by combining DGGE and quantitative PCR[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2017,8:1748. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01748

    [5]

    WU L K,CHEN J,WU H M,et al. Effects of consecutive monoculture of Pseudostellaria heterophylla on soil fungal community as determined by pyrosequencing[J]. Scientific Reports,2016,6:26601. DOI: 10.1038/srep26601

    [6] 肖荣凤,陈燕萍,陈梅春,等. 太子参根腐病病原菌的鉴定及防治药剂筛选[J]. 植物保护学报,2020,47(6) :1333−1342.

    XIAO R F,CHEN Y P,CHEN M C,et al. Pathogen identification of root rot of Pseudostellaria heterophylla plant and fungicide screening for its efficient control[J]. Journal of Plant Protection,2020,47(6) :1333−1342. (in Chinese)

    [7]

    YUAN Q S,WANG L,WANG H,et al. Pathogen-mediated assembly of plant-beneficial bacteria to alleviate Fusarium wilt in Pseudostellaria heterophylla[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2022,13:842372. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.842372

    [8] 蔡祖聪,黄新琦,赵军. 作物土传病害防控的健康微生物群落构建原理与实践[J]. 土壤学报,2023,60(5) :1213−1220.

    CAI Z C,HUANG X Q,ZHAO J. Principles and practice of building healthy microbial community to control soil-borne crop disease in intensive agriculture[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2023,60(5) :1213−1220. (in Chinese)

    [9] 康传志,周涛,郭兰萍,等. 全国栽培太子参生态适宜性区划分析[J]. 生态学报,2016,36(10) :2934−2944.

    KANG C Z,ZHOU T,GUO L P,et al. Ecological suitability and regionalization of Pseudostellaria heterophylla (Miq. ) Pax ex Pax et Hoffm. in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2016,36(10) :2934−2944. (in Chinese)

    [10] 陈婷,焦艳阳,周鑫烨,等. 不同土壤强化处理对连作太子参生长发育的影响及其效果评价[J]. 作物学报,2023,49(8) :2225−2239.

    CHEN T,JIAO Y Y,ZHOU X Y,et al. Effects of different soil intensification treatments on growth and development of Radix pseudostellariae in continuous cropping system[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica,2023,49(8) :2225−2239. (in Chinese)

    [11] 王文丽,李娟,赵旭. 生物有机肥对连作当归根际土壤细菌群落结构和根腐病的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2019,30(8) :2813−2821.

    WANG W L,LI J,ZHAO X. Effects of biological organic fertilizer on rhisosphere soil bacteria community and root rot diseases of continuous cropping Angelica sinensis[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2019,30(8) :2813−2821. (in Chinese)

    [12] 吴红淼,张晟恺,焦艳阳,等. 微生物菌肥对太子参连作障碍和药理作用的改良效应[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文) ,2021,29(8) :1315−1326.

    WU H M,ZHANG S K,JIAO Y Y,et al. Effects of microbial fertilizer application on the quality and pharmacological activities of Radix pseudostellariae under continuous monoculture regimes[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2021,29(8) :1315−1326. (in Chinese)

    [13] 刘晓雨,卞荣军,陆海飞,等. 生物质炭与土壤可持续管理:从土壤问题到生物质产业[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2018,33(2) :184−190.

    LIU X Y,BIAN R J,LU H F,et al. Biochar for sustainable soil management:Biomass technology and industry from soil perspectives[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2018,33(2) :184−190. (in Chinese)

    [14]

    BONANOMI G,ANTIGNANI V,CAPODILUPO M,et al. Identifying the characteristics of organic soil amendments that suppress soilborne plant diseases[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2010,42(2) :136−144. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.10.012

    [15] 郑雪芳,陈燕萍,肖荣凤,等. 水肥菌一体化番茄基质栽培系统青枯病病株和健株根际微生物群落结构的差异[J]. 微生物学报,2022,62(4) :1524−1535.

    ZHENG X F,CHEN Y P,XIAO R F,et al. Difference of rhizobacterial community structure between bacterial wilt infected and healthy tomato plants in a substrate culture system[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica,2022,62(4) :1524−1535. (in Chinese)

    [16] 陈慕松. 太子参有机生态型无土栽培基质筛选与试验研究[J]. 中药材,2018,41(10) :2272−2276.

    CHEN M S. Screening and experimental study on organic ecotype soilless culture substrate of Pseudostellaria heterophylla[J]. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials,2018,41(10) :2272−2276. (in Chinese)

    [17] 肖荣凤,陈燕萍,许丽宁,等. 太子参健康种参块根的筛选与鉴定[J]. 福建农业科技,2021,52(8) :1−6.

    XIAO R F,CHEN Y P,XU L N,et al. Screening and identification of the root tubers of healthy cultivated Pseudostellaria heterophylla[J]. Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology,2021,52(8) :1−6. (in Chinese)

    [18] 袁小坦. 有机肥对太子参农艺性状及其经济效益的影响[J]. 福建农业科技,2023,54(5) :47−51.

    YUAN X T. Effects of organic fertilizers on the agronomic traits and economic benefits of Pseudostellaria heterophylla[J]. Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology,2023,54(5) :47−51. (in Chinese)

    [19]

    WHITE T J,BRUNS T,LEE S,et al. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics[M]//PCR Protocols. Amsterdam:Elsevier,1990:315–322.

    [20] 刘晓燕,罗振鹏,崔伟康,等. 绿色荧光蛋白标记下镰刀菌侵染地黄的组织学观察[J]. 菌物学报,2015,34(6) :1092−1100.

    LIU X Y,LUO Z P,CUI W K,et al. Histological observation of the infection process in Rehmannia glutinosa by Fusarium oxysporum labeled with green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene[J]. Mycosystema,2015,34(6) :1092−1100. (in Chinese)

    [21]

    WUTZLER T,ZAEHLE S,SCHRUMPF M,et al. Adaptation of microbial resource allocation affects modelled long term soil organic matter and nutrient cycling[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2017,115:322−336. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.08.031

    [22]

    WU L K,CHEN J,WU H M,et al. Insights into the regulation of rhizosphere bacterial communities by application of bio-organic fertilizer in Pseudostellaria heterophylla monoculture regime[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2016,7:1788.

    [23] 朱菲莹,张屹,肖姬玲,等. 生物有机肥对土壤微生物群落结构变化及西瓜枯萎病的调控[J]. 微生物学报,2019,59(12) :2323−2333.

    ZHU F Y,ZHANG Y,XIAO J L,et al. Regulation of soil microbial community structures and watermelon Fusarium wilt by using bio-organic fertilizer[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica,2019,59(12) :2323−2333. (in Chinese)

    [24] 管鸿智,黄荣珍,王金平,等. 红壤区退化林地表土真菌群落结构对土壤改良措施的响应[J]. 环境科学,2023,44(1) :494−501.

    GUAN H Z,HUANG R Z,WANG J P,et al. Response of topsoil fungal community structure to soil improvement measures in degraded forest of red soil region[J]. Environmental Science,2023,44(1) :494−501. (in Chinese)

    [25] 罗俊,林兆里,李诗燕,等. 不同土壤改良措施对机械压实酸化蔗地土壤理化性质及微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 作物学报,2020,46(4) :596−613. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.94102

    LUO J,LIN Z L,LI S Y,et al. Effects of different soil improvement measures on soil physicochemical properties and microbial community structures in mechanically compacted acidified sugarcane field[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica,2020,46(4) :596−613. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.94102

    [26]

    ARNOLD A E,HARRINGTON A H,U’REN J M,et al. Two new endophytic species enrich the Coniochaeta endophytica/C. prunicola clade:Coniochaeta lutea sp. nov. and C. palaoa sp. nov[J]. Plant and Fungal Systematics,2021,66(1) :66−78. DOI: 10.35535/pfsyst-2021-0006

    [27] 姚粟,王鹏辉,白飞荣,等. 中国传统发酵食品用微生物菌种名单研究(第二版) [J]. 食品与发酵工业,2022,48(1) :272−307.

    YAO S,WANG P H,BAI F R,et al. Research on the inventory of microbial food cultures in Chinese traditional fermented foods (2nd edition) [J]. Food and Fermentation Industries,2022,48(1) :272−307. (in Chinese)

    [28]

    HUI F L,KE T,NIU Q H,et al. Candida baotianensis sp. nov. ,an ascomycetous yeast species from forest soil in China[J]. The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology,2012,58(1) :59–63.

    [29] 桂莎,刘芳,张立丹,等. 复合菌剂防控香蕉枯萎病的效果及其微生物学机制[J]. 土壤学报,2020,57(4) :995−1007.

    GUI S,LIU F,ZHANG L D,et al. Effects of complex anti-fungal agents biocontrolling Fusarium wilt on banana and its microbiological mechanism[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2020,57(4) :995−1007. (in Chinese)

    [30] 林茂兹,黄少华,陈巧巧,等. 太子参连作障碍及其根际土壤尖孢镰刀菌数量变化[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学) ,2012,27(5) :716−721.

    LIN M Z,HUANG S H,CHEN Q Q,et al. Studies on continuous cropping obstacle of pseudostelariae heterophylla and the change of Fusarium oxysporum numbers in its rhizosphere[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science) ,2012,27(5) :716−721. (in Chinese)

    [31] 姜婷婷,任忠秀,刘亮,等. 工程化土壤改良结合生物肥对再植苹果根际土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 农业生物技术学报,2023,31(6) :1262−1274.

    JIANG T T,REN Z X,LIU L,et al. Effects of engineered soil improvement combined with biofertilizer on rhizosphere soil microbial community in replanted apple (Malus domestica) [J]. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology,2023,31(6) :1262−1274. (in Chinese)

    [32] 李树江,周雪林,杨友联. 太子参叶斑病病原菌鉴定及防治药剂筛选[J]. 植物保护,2018,44(3) :182−185.

    LI S J,ZHOU X L,YANG Y L. Pathogen identification of leaf spot on Pseudostellaria heterophylla and screening of fungicides for its control[J]. Plant Protection,2018,44(3) :182−185. (in Chinese)

    [33]

    KUANG Y B,WANG Z,ABAH F,et al. Long-read genome sequence resource of Ascochyta versabilis causing leaf spot disease in Pseudostellaria heterophylla[J]. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®,2020,33(12) :1438−1440.

    [34]

    CHEN Q,ZHANG K,ZHANG G Z,et al. A polyphasic approach to characterise two novel species of Phoma (Didymellaceae) from China[J]. Phytotaxa,2015,197(4) :267−281. DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.197.4.4

图(6)  /  表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  27
  • HTML全文浏览量:  8
  • PDF下载量:  1
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-10-23
  • 修回日期:  2024-11-23
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-01-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回