人参属植物叶绿体基因组特征及其进化的研究

刘潮; 李敏; 任怡园; 钱柏霖; 韩利红

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.007.009

人参属植物叶绿体基因组特征及其进化的研究

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.007.009

曲靖师范学院生物资源与食品工程学院/云南省高校特色果酒技术创新与应用工程研究中心，云南　曲靖　655011

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（32060710、32100010）

详细信息

作者简介:
刘潮：刘潮（1980-），男，博士，副教授，研究方向：植物系统发育与进化（E-mail：liuchao_80@163.com）

通讯作者:
韩利红（1981-），女，博士，副教授，研究方向：真菌系统发育与进化（E-mail：hanlihong9527@126.com）

中图分类号: R 282
计量
- 文章访问数: 562
- HTML全文浏览量: 166
- PDF下载量: 25
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-03-31
- 录用日期: 2022-03-31
- 修回日期: 2022-05-30
- 网络出版日期: 2022-08-29
- 刊出日期: 2022-07-28

Characteristics and Evolution of Panax Chloroplast Genomes

College of Biological Resource and Food Engineering/Yunnan Engineering Research Center of Fruit Wine，Qujing Normal University，Qujing, Yunnan　655011，China

摘要

摘要: 目的对人参属（Panax L.）物种叶绿体基因组特征及其系统发育进行研究，为我国人参属资源的遗传学研究和开发利用提供理论依据。方法基于14种人参属植物叶绿体基因组序列，利用生物信息学软件，对叶绿体基因组特征、序列重复、结构变异、基因进化和系统发育进行分析。结果人参属物种叶绿体基因组均为典型的四分体结构，包含114个unique基因。长重复序列主要为回文重复和正向重复，30～39 bp的重复序列最多，SSR大多为A/T重复，单核苷酸重复是最丰富的类型。人参属叶绿体基因组未发生基因重排，反向重复区（IR）与单拷贝区边界高度保守，鉴定的12个核苷酸高度可变热点中7个位于大单拷贝（LSC）区，5个位于小单拷贝（SSC）区。根据dN/dS比率，发现功能未知基因clpP、ycf1和ycf2受正选择作用。系统发育分析显示，屏边三七和三叶参位于基部支系，四倍体人参和西洋参与其他二倍体物种聚在不同支系，三七、竹节参和越南参则亲缘关系较近。结论人参属叶绿体基因组基因数目和顺序一致，基因组结构保守，重复序列数目和类型存在差异，单拷贝区核苷酸多态性高于IR区，正选择基因可能与物种的生态适应性有关。
- 人参属 /
- 叶绿体基因组 /
- 重复 /
- 变异 /
- 系统发育
Abstract: Objective Characteristics and phylogeny of chloroplast genomes of the medicinally and economically valuable species in Panax genus were studied. Methods Using bioinformatics software, the properties, repeats, structural variation, evolution, and phylogeny of the genomes of chloroplasts from 14 ginseng species were analyzed. Results The genomes consisted of typical quadripartite structure with 114 unique genes. The long repeats in them were mainly of palindromic and forward types with a length between 30 bp and 39 bp. The simple sequence repeats were largely A/T type and most abundantly mononucleotides. No gene rearrangement occurred in the genomes was observed. The boundary between the inverted repeat region and the single copy region was highly conserved. Of the 12 regions with highly variable nucleotides, 7 were in the large and 5 in the small single copy region. Indicated by the dN/dS ratios, the positive selection could occur on clpP, ycf1, and ycf2 with unknown functions. The phylogenetic analysis showed that P. stipulenatus and P. trifolius were in the basal lineage, the tetraploid P. ginseng and P. quinquefolius separated from other diploid species, while P. notoginseng, P. japonicus, and P. vietnamensis closely related. Conclusion The chloroplasts of the ginseng species examined were basically same in number and order of genomes, conservative in structure, but divert in number and type of repeats. The nucleotide polymorphism of the chloroplasts was higher in single copy region than inverted repeat regions. The positive selection genes identified in the study might result from the ecological adaptation of these Panax species.
- Panax L. /
- chloroplast genome /
- repeat /
- variation /
- phylogeny

HTML全文

图 1 人参属物种叶绿体基因组长重复序列类型及分布

A：正向、回文、反向、互补重复数量；B：长重复类型及数量。

Figure 1. Types and distribution of long repeats in chloroplast genomes of Panax species

A: Counts of forward, palindromic, reverse and complementary repeats; B: types and counts of long repeats.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 人参属物种叶绿体基因组SSR位点类型及分布

A：单核苷酸、二核苷酸、三核苷酸、四核苷酸、五核苷酸、六核苷酸重复数量；B：SSR类型及数量。

Figure 2. Types and distribution of SSRs in chloroplast genomes of Panax species

A: Counts of mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta- and hexanucleotides; B: types and counts of SSR.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 人参属物种叶绿体基因组LSC、SSC和IRs边界比较

Figure 3. Borders of LSC, SSC, and IRs in chloroplast genomes of Panax species

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 人参属物种叶绿体基因组序列比较

Figure 4. Sequences of chloroplast genomes of Panax species

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 人参属物种叶绿体基因组序列多态性分析

Figure 5. Nucleotide diversity of chloroplast genomes of Panax species

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 人参属叶绿体蛋白编码基因dN/dS分析

Figure 6. dN/dS ratios on protein coding genes of chloroplasts of Panax species

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 基于IQ-TREE软件构建的人参属物种叶绿体基因组系统发育树

Figure 7. Phylogenetic tree of chloroplast genes of Panax species based on IQ-TREE

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 人参属物种叶绿体基因组特征

Table 1. Chloroplast genomes of Panax species

物种 Species	登录号 Accession	长度 Length/bp				GC含量 GC content/%
物种 Species	登录号 Accession	基因组 Genome	LSC	SSC	IR	基因组 Genome	LSC	SSC	IR
人参 P. ginseng	MK408938	156 241	86 128	18 077	26 018	38.07	36.27	32.18	43.10
竹节参 P. japonicus	KP036469	156 188	86 199	18 013	25 988	38.07	36.29	32.21	43.05
疙瘩七 P. japonicus var. bipinnatifidus	MK408962	156 244	86 186	18 006	26 026	38.06	36.28	32.21	43.05
珠子参 P. major	MN496312	156 402	86 189	18 007	26 103	38.07	36.28	32.22	43.05
三七 P. notoginseng	MK408945	156 319	86 157	18 004	26 079	38.07	36.27	32.23	43.07
假人参 P. pseudoginseng	MW145449	156 074	86 124	18 008	25 971	38.06	36.27	32.22	43.06
西洋参 P. quinquefolius	MK408953	156 070	86 077	17 993	26 000	38.07	36.27	32.22	43.08
屏边三七 P. stipuleanatus	MK408965	156 007	86 083	18 150	25 887	38.04	36.26	32.07	43.08
三叶参 P. trifolius	MF100782	156 157	86 322	18 047	25 894	38.08	36.27	32.26	43.10
越南参 P. vietnamensis	KP036470	155 993	86 178	17 935	25 940	38.05	36.27	32.22	43.02
野三七 P. vietnamensis var. fuscidiscus	MT798585	156 284	86 171	17 971	26 071	38.06	36.28	32.27	42.98
越南参变种 P. vietnamensis var. langbianensis	MT798583	155 984	86 174	17 934	25 938	38.05	36.27	32.21	43.03
峨眉三七 P. wangianus	MK408964	156 189	86 190	17 969	26 015	38.07	36.29	32.21	43.03
姜状三七 P. zingiberensis	MK408969	156 192	86 116	17 966	26 055	38.07	36.31	32.27	43.00

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 基于位点模型的人参属叶绿体蛋白编码基因正选择分析

Table 2. Potential positive selection test on chloroplast genomes of Panax species based on site model

基因 Gene	M1 vs M2		M7 vs M8		正选择位点 Positively selected sites
基因 Gene	2ΔlnL	P 值	2ΔlnL	P 值	正选择位点 Positively selected sites
accD	2.39	3.0×10^-1	2.47	2.9×10^-1	139 Q, 0.505; 141 S, 0.517; 144 R, 0.528; 209 A, 0.856; 264 E, 0.504; 364 I, 0.507; 372 L, 0.526; 494 Q, 0.855
atpF	3.37	1.9×10^-1	3.42	1.8×10^-1	14 W, 0.541; 77 Q, 0.537; 158 G, 0.854
cemA	7.48	2.4×10^-2	7.48	2.4×10^-2	14 A, 0.547; 22 W, 0.538; 54 K, 0.536; 102 D, 0.533; 103 R, 0.544; 118 V, 0.973*; 205 F, 0.531; 208 W, 0.540
clpP	13.40	1.2×10^-3	13.40	1.2×10^-3	38 P, 0.990*; 39 V, 0.622; 40 A, 0.935; 41 S, 0.612; 138 G, 0.629; 160 Q, 0.626
matK	19.22	6.7×10^-5	19.25	6.6×10^-5	83 R, 0.994**
ndhD	0.77	6.8×10^-1	0.99	6.1×10^-1	22 F, 0.830; 41 I, 0.829
ndhF	19.81	5.0×10^-5	20.29	3.9×10^-5	17 P, 0.597; 123 R, 0.592; 133 T, 0.583; 223 F, 0.959; 421 I, 0.964; 463 Q, 0.591; 483 R, 0.569; 499 H, 0.552; 502 A, 0.965; 511 Q, 0.591; 512 M, 0.526; 532 K, 0.559; 534 I, 0.962; 572 N, 0.543; 598 D, 0.573; 606 F, 0.548; 621 L, 0.630; 641 I, 0.549; 642 G, 0.597; 657 G, 0.594; 670 A, 0.963; 677 I, 0.532; 703 S, 0.548; 737 Y, 0.964; 743 F, 0.537; 745 D, 0.958; 746 L, 1.000*
rbcL	15.94	3.5×10^-4	16.10	3.2×10^-4	225 L, 0.632; 226 Y, 0.969; 230 A, 0.635; 270 I, 0.866; 281 A, 0.644; 328 S, 0.999; 353 F, 0.584; 439 R, 0.968; 472 V, 0.609; 474 I, 0.621; 478 V, 0.714
rpl2	0	1	0	1	99 K, 0.651; 265 D, 0.650; 267 L, 0.652
rpoA	14.53	7.0×10^-4	14.56	6.9×10^-4	34 L, 0.506; 256 E, 0.991; 264 N, 0.999; 272 S, 0.533; 320 A, 0.849; 337 L, 0.537
rpoB	0.90	6.4×10^-1	0.90	6.4×10^-1	37 Y, 0.505; 165 R, 0.502; 193 R, 0.502; 295 I, 0.502; 365 T, 0.504; 459 S, 0.502; 695 K, 0.506; 735 T, 0.504; 935 D, 0.832
rpoC2	0	1	0	1	85 Q, 0.736
rps12	0	1	0.02	9.9×10^-1	25 R, 0.502
ycf1	75.81	0	75.78	0	205 K, 1.000; 206 Y, 0.999; 288 I, 0.876; 532 T, 0.803; 533 K, 0.956; 604 R, 0.801; 624 R, 0.825; 668 I, 0.779; 685 W, 0.837; 699 V, 0.824; 701 Q, 0.802; 706 V, 0.814; 720 V, 0.856; 722 T, 0.814; 723 D, 0.808; 731 R, 0.982; 733 K, 0.809; 734 I, 0.996*; 736 L, 0.855; 737 I, 0.803; 751 N, 0.760; 809 A, 0.828; 906 N, 0.768; 914 E, 0.795; 915 L, 0.788; 929 L, 0.835; 957 K, 0.979; 1030 E, 0.979; 1116 K, 0.804; 1172 M, 0.731; 1186 Q, 0.798; 1206 Q, 0.798; 1502 Q, 0.754; 1601 I, 1.000; 1616 D, 0.773; 1631 R, 0.814; 1652 R, 0.795; 1665 V, 0.738; 1685 E, 0.978; 1710 I, 0.979*; 1739 R, 0.793
ycf2	14.95	5.7×10^-4	14.95	5.7×10^-4	30 R, 0.767; 56 R, 0.770; 103 L, 0.765; 126 S, 0.765; 248 S, 0.769; 285 L, 0.765; 320 L, 0.766; 332 R, 0.764; 432 V, 0.765; 466 Y, 0.765; 573 I, 0.764; 598 L, 0.766; 606 M, 0.759; 759 F, 0.763; 850 S, 0.965; 943 E, 0.764; 1037 P, 0.766; 1050 F, 0.765; 1064 S, 0.763; 1074 I, 0.965; 1093 L, 0.767; 1101 N, 0.964; 1171 W, 0.767; 1173 S, 0.765; 1245 P, 0.766; 1265 D, 0.762; 1309 D, 0.762; 1344 R, 0.764; 1422 L, 0.965; 1431 F, 0.763; 1522 D, 0.767; 1550 Y, 0.766; 1656 N, 0.763; 1717 S, 0.768; 1799 R, 0.769; 2045 E, 0.764
和分别表示正选择位点概率＞ 95%和＞ 99%。 and ** indicate that the probabilities of positively selected sites are ＞ 95% and ＞ 99%, respectively.

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(39)

[1]	WEN J, ZIMMER E A. Phylogeny and biogeography of Panax L. (The Ginseng Genus, Araliaceae): Inferences from ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA [J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1996, 6(2): 167−177. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1996.0069
[2]	NGUYEN V B, LINH GIANG V N, WAMINAL N E, et al. Comprehensive comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes from seven Panax species and development of an authentication system based on species-unique single nucleotide polymorphism markers [J]. Journal of Ginseng Research, 2020, 41(1): 135−144. doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2018.06.003
[3]	NGUYEN V B, PARK H S, LEE S C, et al. Authentication markers for five major Panax species developed via comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genome sequences [J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2017, 65(30): 6298−6306. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00925
[4]	LI S, WANG P, YANG W Z, et al. Characterization of the components and pharmacological effects of mountain-cultivated ginseng and garden ginseng based on the integrative pharmacology strategy [J]. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2021, 12: 659954. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.659954
[5]	SHIN B K, KWON S W, PARK J H. Chemical diversity of ginseng saponins from Panax ginseng [J]. Journal of Ginseng Research, 2015, 39(4): 287−298. doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2014.12.005
[6]	CHOI H I, KIM N H, LEE J, et al. Evolutionary relationship of Panax ginseng and P. quinquefolius inferred from sequencing and comparative analysis of expressed sequence tags [J]. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2013, 60(4): 1377−1387. doi: 10.1007/s10722-012-9926-3
[7]	YANG Z J, LIU G Z, ZHANG G H, et al. The chromosome-scale high-quality genome assembly of Panax notoginseng provides insight into dencichine biosynthesis [J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2021, 19(5): 869−871. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13558
[8]	LIU C, CHEN H H, TANG L Z, et al. Plastid genome evolution of a monophyletic group in the subtribe Lauriineae (Laureae, Lauraceae)[J]. Plant Diversity, 2022 , 44 (4): 377 − 388. DOI: 10.1016/j.pld.2021.11.009
[9]	刘潮, 韩利红, 彭悦, 等. 黄丹木姜子叶绿体基因组特征分析 [J]. 南方农业学报, 2022, 53(1):12−20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2022.01.002 LIU C, HAN L H, PENG Y, et al. Characteristics of chloroplast genome of Litsea elongata(wall. ex nees)Benth. et hook. F [J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2022, 53(1): 12−20.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2022.01.002
[10]	刘潮, 韩利红, 代小波, 等. 辣椒属叶绿体基因组特征及进化 [J]. 热带作物学报, 2022, 43(3):447−454. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2022.03.002 LIU C, HAN L H, DAI X B, et al. Characteristics and phylogenetics of the complete chloroplast genomes of Capsicum species [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2022, 43(3): 447−454.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2022.03.002
[11]	YU J J, FU J, FANG Y P, et al. Complete chloroplast genomes of Rubus species (Rosaceae) and comparative analysis within the genus [J]. BMC Genomics, 2022, 23(1): 32. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-08225-6
[12]	刘潮, 唐利洲, 韩利红. 四川山胡椒叶绿体基因组特征及山胡椒属系统发育 [J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(12):167−174. LIU C, TANG L Z, HAN L H. Characterization of the chloroplast genome of Lindera setchuenensis and phylogenetics of the genus Lindera [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(12): 167−174.(in Chinese)
[13]	LIU C K, YANG Z Y, YANG L F, et al. The complete plastome of Panax stipuleanatus: Comparative and phylogenetic analyses of the genus Panax (Araliaceae) [J]. Plant Diversity, 2018, 40(6): 265−276. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2018.11.001
[14]	岳杰. 四种人参属植物叶绿体全基因组结构及其系统发育分析[D]. 汉中: 陕西理工大学, 2021 YUE J. Structural and phylogenetic analyses of the complete chloroplast genomes of four species within the genus Panax linn. [D]. Hanzhong: Shaanxi University of Technology, 2021. (in Chinese)
[15]	KURTZ S, CHOUDHURI J V, OHLEBUSCH E, et al. REPuter: The manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale [J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2001, 29(22): 4633−4642. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.22.4633
[16]	BEIER S, THIEL T, MÜNCH T, et al. MISA-web: A web server for microsatellite prediction [J]. Bioinformatics, 2017, 33(16): 2583−2585. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx198
[17]	AMIRYOUSEFI A, HYVÖNEN J, POCZAI P. IRscope: An online program to visualize the junction sites of chloroplast genomes [J]. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018, 34(17): 3030−3031. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty220
[18]	FRAZER K A, PACHTER L, POLIAKOV A, et al. VISTA: Computational tools for comparative genomics[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2004, 32(Web Server issue): W273-W279.
[19]	KATOH K, ROZEWICKI J, YAMADA K D. MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization [J]. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2019, 20(4): 1160−1166. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx108
[20]	ROZAS J, FERRER-MATA A, SÁNCHEZ-DELBARRIO J C, et al. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets [J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2017, 34(12): 3299−3302. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx248
[21]	XU B, YANG Z H. PAMLX: A graphical user interface for PAML [J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2013, 30(12): 2723−2724. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst179
[22]	MINH B Q, SCHMIDT H A, CHERNOMOR O, et al. IQ-TREE 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era [J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2020, 37(5): 1530−1534. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa015
[23]	GANLEY A R D, KOBAYASHI T. Monitoring the rate and dynamics of concerted evolution in the ribosomal DNA repeats of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using experimental evolution [J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2011, 28(10): 2883−2891. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr117
[24]	ZEB U, DONG W L, ZHANG T T, et al. Comparative plastid genomics of Pinus species: Insights into sequence variations and phylogenetic relationships [J]. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 2020, 58(2): 118−132. doi: 10.1111/jse.12492
[25]	ZHU B, QIAN F, HOU Y F, et al. Complete chloroplast genome features and phylogenetic analysis of Eruca sativa (Brassicaceae) [J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(3): e0248556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248556
[26]	LI D M, YE Y J, XU Y C, et al. Complete chloroplast genomes of Zingiber montanum and Zingiber zerumbet: Genome structure, comparative and phylogenetic analyses [J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(7): e0236590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236590
[27]	XU K W, LIN C X, LEE S Y, et al. Comparative analysis of complete Ilex (Aquifoliaceae) chloroplast genomes: Insights into evolutionary dynamics and phylogenetic relationships [J]. BMC Genomics, 2022, 23(1): 203. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08397-9
[28]	KASHI Y, KING D G. Simple sequence repeats as advantageous mutators in evolution [J]. Trends in Genetics, 2006, 22(5): 253−259. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2006.03.005
[29]	HAN C Y, DING R, ZONG X Y, et al. Structural characterization of Platanthera ussuriensis chloroplast genome and comparative analyses with other species of Orchidaceae [J]. BMC Genomics, 2022, 23(1): 84. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08319-9
[30]	YAN J W, LI J H, YU L, et al. Comparative chloroplast genomes of Prunus subgenus Cerasus (Rosaceae): Insights into sequence variations and phylogenetic relationships [J]. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2021, 17(6): 50.
[31]	马孟莉, 张薇, 孟衡玲, 等. 草果叶绿体基因组特征及系统发育分析 [J]. 中草药, 2021, 52(19):6023−6031. doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2021.19.025 MA M L, ZHANG W, MENG H L, et al. Characterization and phylogenetic analysis of the complete chloroplast genome of Amomum tsao-ko [J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2021, 52(19): 6023−6031.(in Chinese) doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2021.19.025
[32]	KIM K J. Complete chloroplast genome sequences from Korean ginseng (Panax schinseng nees) and comparative analysis of sequence evolution among 17 vascular plants [J]. DNA Research, 2004, 11(4): 247−261. doi: 10.1093/dnares/11.4.247
[33]	LI R, MA P F, WEN J, et al. Complete sequencing of five Araliaceae chloroplast genomes and the phylogenetic implications [J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(10): e78568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078568
[34]	TROFIMOV D, CADAR D, SCHMIDT-CHANASIT J, et al. A comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genomes of seven Ocotea species (Lauraceae) confirms low sequence divergence within the Ocotea complex [J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12: 1120. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04635-4
[35]	YANG J, CHIANG Y C, HSU T W, et al. Characterization and comparative analysis among plastome sequences of eight endemic Rubus (Rosaceae) species in Taiwan [J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11: 1152. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80143-1
[36]	NIU Y F, GAO C W, LIU J. Comparative analysis of the complete plastid genomes of Mangifera species and gene transfer between plastid and mitochondrial genomes [J]. PeerJ, 2021, 9: e10774. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10774
[37]	GARUD N R, POLLARD K S. Population genetics in the human microbiome [J]. Trends in Genetics:TIG, 2020, 36(1): 53−67. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2019.10.010
[38]	JI Y H, LIU C K, YANG Z Y, et al. Testing and using complete plastomes and ribosomal DNA sequences as the next generation DNA barcodes in Panax (Araliaceae) [J]. Molecular Ecology Resources, 2019, 19(5): 1333−1345. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13050
[39]	KIM N H, CHOI H I, KIM K H, et al. Evidence of genome duplication revealed by sequence analysis of multi-loci expressed sequence tag-simple sequence repeat bands in Panax ginseng Meyer [J]. Journal of Ginseng Research, 2014, 38(2): 130−135. doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2013.12.005