Growth and Photosynthesis of <i>Brassica napus</i> Seedlings Affected by Organic Manure Application on Acid Red Soil under Aluminum Stress

YU Juhua; WANG Limin; DING Hong; WANG Huangping; ZHENG Xiangzhou; ZHANG Yushu; ZHANG Yinlong

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2024.02.011

Volume 39 Issue 2

Feb. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences > 2024 > 39(2): 206-215

YU J H, WANG L M, DING H, et al. Growth and Photosynthesis of Brassica napus Seedlings Affected by Organic Manure Application on Acid Red Soil under Aluminum Stress [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences，2024，39（2）：206−215 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2024.02.011

Citation:

YU J H, WANG L M, DING H, et al. Growth and Photosynthesis of Brassica napus Seedlings Affected by Organic Manure Application on Acid Red Soil under Aluminum Stress [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences，2024，39（2）：206−215 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2024.02.011

Citation:

PDF( 1357 KB)

Growth and Photosynthesis of Brassica napus Seedlings Affected by Organic Manure Application on Acid Red Soil under Aluminum Stress

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2024.02.011

1.
Institute of Resources, Environment and Soil Fertilizer, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Fujian Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, Fuzhou, Fujian　350013, China
2.
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei, Anhui　230601, China
3.
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu　210037, China

Received Date: 2023-04-17
Rev Recd Date: 2023-07-07

Available Online: 2024-03-28

Publish Date: 2024-02-28

Abstract

Abstract

Objectives Effects of applying organic manure on the growth and photosynthesis of plants cultivated on acid red soil contaminated by aluminum were studied. Methods In a pot experiment, aluminum-laden acid red soil was used as control (CK) or blended with either pig manure at the rate of 10 g·kg⁻¹ (P10), 30 g·kg⁻¹ (P30), or 50 g·kg⁻¹ (P50), chicken manure at 10 g·kg⁻¹ (C10), 30 g·kg⁻¹ (C30), or 50 g·kg⁻¹ (C50), or pig and chicken manures at 15 g·kg⁻¹ each (PC15). Biomass and photosynthetic properties including chlorophyll fluorescence indexes of Brassica napus L. seedlings grown in the pots were determined. Results Application of the organic manure in the soil significant improved the aboveground biomass, photosynthetic pigment content, and chlorophyll fluorescence indexes of the seedlings over CK (P＜0.05). In 80 d after the treatments, these indicators were higher than CK indicating the heavy metal toxicity in the soil had been gradually alleviated by chelation. At a same application rate, chicken manure rendered a greater effect than pig manure on the increases of aboveground biomass and photosynthetic pigment but less on the photosynthetic parameters, F_v/F_m and qP, while the combination of chicken and pig manures performed superior to either chicken or pig manure alone on the photosynthetic pigment content, T_r, G_s, C_i, and qN (P＜0.05). It appeared that the alkaline chicken manure benefited the growth more and that the nutrient-rich pig manure did the photosynthesis more for the seedlings. Conclusions To effectively mitigate the aluminum stress on B. napus L. seedlings grown in an acid red soil, an application of pig manure at 50 g·kg⁻¹, and chicken manure at 30 g·kg⁻¹with appropriate adjustments according to the actual field conditions was recommended.
- Acid red soil,
- organic manures,
- aluminum stress,
- growth,
- photosynthetic fluorescence,
- Brassica napus L.

FullText(HTML)

References(36)

References

[1]	ZHU Q C, DE VRIES W, LIU X J, et al. Enhanced acidification in Chinese croplands as derived from element budgets in the period 1980-2010 [J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 618: 1497−1505. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.289
[2]	周晓阳, 徐明岗, 周世伟, 等. 长期施肥下我国南方典型农田土壤的酸化特征 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(6):1615−1621. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0629 ZHOU X Y, XU M G, ZHOU S W, et al. Soil acidification characteristics in Southern China’s croplands under long-term fertilization [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015, 21(6): 1615−1621. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0629
[3]	ZHU Q C, LIU X J, HAO T X, et al. Modeling soil acidification in typical Chinese cropping systems [J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 613/614: 1339−1348. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.257
[4]	ZHU H H, CHEN C, XU C, et al. Effects of soil acidification and liming on the phytoavailability of cadmium in paddy soils of central subtropical China [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2016, 219: 99−106. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.043
[5]	孔繁翔, 桑伟莲, 蒋新, 等. 铝对植物毒害及植物抗铝作用机理 [J]. 生态学报, 2000, 20(5):855−862. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2000.05.023 KONG F X, SANG W L, JIANG X, et al. Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2000, 20(5): 855−862. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2000.05.023
[6]	MA J F, RYAN P R. Foreword: Understanding how plants cope with acid soils [J]. Functional Plant Biology, 2010, 37(4): 3−6.
[7]	JIN S Q, ZHANG B, WU B, et al. Decoupling livestock and crop production at the household level in China [J]. Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4: 48−55.
[8]	谢光辉, 包维卿, 刘继军, 等. 中国畜禽粪便资源研究现状述评 [J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2018, 23(4):75−87. doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2018.04.10 XIE G H, BAO W Q, LIU J J, et al. An overview of researches on livestock and poultry excreta resource in China [J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2018, 23(4): 75−87. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2018.04.10
[9]	ZUBAIR M, WANG S Q, ZHANG P Y, et al. Biological nutrient removal and recovery from solid and liquid livestock manure: Recent advance and perspective [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 301: 122823. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122823
[10]	李燕青, 温延臣, 林治安, 等. 不同有机肥与化肥配施对氮素利用率和土壤肥力的影响 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(10):1669−1678. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.18417 LI Y Q, WEN Y C, LIN Z A, et al. Effect of different organic manures combined with chemical fertilizer on nitrogen use efficiency and soil fertility [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(10): 1669−1678. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11674/zwyf.18417
[11]	YAN L, RIAZ M, LIU J Y, et al. The aluminum tolerance and detoxification mechanisms in plants; recent advances and prospects [J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2022, 52(9): 1491−1527. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2020.1859306
[12]	RIAZ M, YAN L, WU X W, et al. Boron alleviates the aluminum toxicity in trifoliate orange by regulating antioxidant defense system and reducing root cell injury [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 208: 149−158.
[13]	LI X W, LI Y L, MAI J W, et al. Boron alleviates aluminum toxicity by promoting root alkalization in transition zone via polar auxin transport [J]. Plant Physiology, 2018, 177(3): 1254−1266. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00188
[14]	CHEN L S. Physiological responses and tolerance of plant shoot to aluminum toxicity [J]. Journal of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology, 2006, 32(2): 143−155.
[15]	应小芳, 刘鹏, 徐根娣. 土壤中的铝及其植物效应的研究进展 [J]. 生态环境, 2003, 12(2):237−239. YING X F, LIU P, XU G D. The advance in the research of aluminum in soil and its influence on plant [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2003, 12(2): 237−239. (in Chinese)
[16]	徐芬芬, 程诗雨, 田玉清. 铝胁迫对花生根系生长和生理特性的影响 [J]. 河南农业科学, 2014, 43(9):52−55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2014.09.012 XU F F, CHENG S Y, TIAN Y Q. Effects of aluminum stress on growth and physiological characteristics in peanut root [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 43(9): 52−55. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2014.09.012
[17]	应小芳, 刘鹏. 铝胁迫对大豆叶片光合特性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(1):166−170. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2005.01.034 YING X F, LIU P. Effects of aluminum stress on photosynthetic characters of soybean [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 16(1): 166−170. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2005.01.034
[18]	付斌, 刘宏斌, 胡万里, 等. 施用牛粪对土壤-油菜系统氮素组分的影响 [J]. 土壤通报, 2016, 47(5):1177−1183. FU B, LIU H B, HU W L, et al. Effects of cow manure application on nitrogen cycling in soil-rape systems [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2016, 47(5): 1177−1183. (in Chinese)
[19]	李可, 孙彤, 孙涛, 等. 施用鸡粪有机肥对种植小油菜土壤微生物群落结构多样性的影响 [J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(10):2316−2324. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2020-0036 LI K, SUN T, SUN T, et al. Effects of applying organic fertilizer from chicken excrement on the microbial community structural diversity in soils planted with Chinese cabbage(Brassica chinensis) [J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2020, 39(10): 2316−2324. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11654/jaes.2020-0036
[20]	王逗, 杨杰, 廖汝佳, 等. 化肥有机肥配施对油菜营养生长期根系分泌物的影响 [J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021, (5):95−102. doi: 10.11838/sfsc.1673-6257.20303 WANG D, YANG J, LIAO R J, et al. Effects of chemical fertilizers combined with organic fertilizers on root exudates of rape during vegetative growth period [J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021(5): 95−102. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11838/sfsc.1673-6257.20303
[21]	陈梅, 陈亚华, 沈振国, 等. 猪粪对红壤铝毒的缓解效应 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2002, 8(2):173−176. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2002.02.008 CHEN M, CHEN Y H, SHEN Z G, et al. Amelioration of aluminum toxicity on wheat plants grown in acid red soil by pig manure [J]. Plant Natrition and Fertilizen Science, 2002, 8(2): 173−176. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2002.02.008
[22]	吕焕哲, 王凯荣, 谢小立, 等. 有机物料对酸性红壤铝毒的缓解效应 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007, 13(4):637−641. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2007.04.016 LÜ H Z, WANG K R, XIE X L, et al. Alleviation of organic manure on aluminum toxicity in acid red soil [J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2007, 13(4): 637−641. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2007.04.016
[23]	易冬莲. 油菜生产现状及发展对策 [J]. 湖南农业科学, 1998, (5):47−48. YI D L. Current situation and development countermeasures of rapeseed production [J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 1998(5): 47−48. (in Chinese)
[24]	国家统计局, 中国指数研究院. 中国房地产统计年鉴-2014[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2014.
[25]	闫磊, 姜存仓, Muhammad Riaz, 等. 不同形态硼对油菜幼苗铝毒的缓解效应及其FTIR特征分析 [J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(12):1817−1826. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.01817 YAN L, JIANG C C, RIAZ M, et al. Mitigative effect of different forms of boron on aluminum toxicity of rape seedlings and its FTIR characteristics [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2017, 43(12): 1817−1826. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.01817
[26]	韩德鹏, 吕伟生, 陈明, 等. 缓释硼肥种肥用量对红壤油菜生长发育和产量的影响 [J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(10):2394−2403. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.10.2394 HAN D P, LYU W S, CHEN M, et al. Effects of the application rate of slow-release boric fertilizer on the growth and yield of rapeseed (Brassica napus L. ) in red soil cultivated land under the simultaneous sowing of fertilizer and seeds [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(10): 2394−2403. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.10.2394
[27]	LOFTON J, GODSEY C B, ZHANG H. Determining aluminum tolerance and critical soil pH for winter canola production for acidic soils in temperate regions [J]. Agronomy Journal, 2010, 102(1): 327−332. doi: 10.2134/agronj2009.0252
[28]	鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1999.
[29]	BILGER W, BJÖRKMAN O. Role of the xanthophyll cycle in photoprotection elucidated by measurements of light-induced absorbance changes, fluorescence and photosynthesis in leaves of Hedera canariensis [J]. Photosynthesis Research, 1990, 25(3): 173−185. doi: 10.1007/BF00033159
[30]	SCHREIBER U, GADEMANN R, RALPH P J, et al. Assessment of photosynthetic performance of Prochloron in Lissoclinum patella in hospite by chlorophyll fluorescence measurements [J]. Plant and Cell Physiology, 1997, 38(8): 945−951. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029256
[31]	余居华, 钟继承, 范成新, 等. 湖泊基质客土改良的环境效应: 对芦苇生长及光合荧光特性的影响 [J]. 环境科学, 2015, 36(12):4444−4454. YU J H, ZHONG J C, FAN C X, et al. Environmental effect of substrate amelioration on lake: Effects on Phragmites communis growth and photosynthetic fluorescence characteristics [J]. Environmental Science, 2015, 36(12): 4444−4454. (in Chinese)
[32]	DELHAIZE E, RYAN P R. Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants [J]. Plant Physiology, 1995, 107(2): 315−321. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.2.315
[33]	SAMAC D A, TESFAYE M. Plant improvement for tolerance to aluminum in acid soils–a review [J]. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 2003, 75(3): 189−207. doi: 10.1023/A:1025843829545
[34]	DAWSON S P, DENNISON W C. Effects of ultraviolet and photosynthetically active radiation on five seagrass species [J]. Marine Biology, 1996, 125(4): 629−638. doi: 10.1007/BF00349244
[35]	ROELOFS J G M, BROUWER E, BOBBINK R. Restoration of aquatic macrophyte vegetation in acidified and eutrophicated shallow soft water wetlands in the Netherlands[M]//NIENHUIS PH, GULATI RD. Ecological Restoration of Aquatic and Semi-Aquatic Ecosystems in the Netherlands (NW Europe). Dordrecht: Springer, 2002: 171-180.
[36]	CALLEJA M L, MARBÀ N, DUARTE C M. The relationship between seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) decline and sulfide porewater concentration in carbonate sediments [J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2007, 73(3/4): 583−588.