• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊
LIU Yun, CAO Yi, LIU Bo, LIU Dan-ying, CHEN Qian-qian. Tolerance of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains for Phytoprotein Yoghurt Fermentation to Simulated Gastrointestinal Environments[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 28(7): 709-713. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.07.017
Citation: LIU Yun, CAO Yi, LIU Bo, LIU Dan-ying, CHEN Qian-qian. Tolerance of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains for Phytoprotein Yoghurt Fermentation to Simulated Gastrointestinal Environments[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 28(7): 709-713. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.07.017

Tolerance of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains for Phytoprotein Yoghurt Fermentation to Simulated Gastrointestinal Environments

More Information
  • Received Date: March 18, 2013
  • Previous studies have revealed that Lactobacillus plantarum FJAT-7926and Lactobacillus casei FJAT7928are promising fermentation agents for phytoprotein yoghurt beverage.The aim of our study was to examine the tolerance differences of the two strains under artificial gastric juice with different pH values and artificial intestinal juice containing different concentrates of bile salt and trypsin.The results showed that both of them have high tolerance responses to low pH value.When incubated in artificial gastric juice with pH3.0for 4h, survival of each tested strain was over 1×108cfu·mL-1 with a survival rate of 56.06%and 55.65%, respectively.However, the survival of them declined to 1×105cfu·mL-1 when incubated in the juice with pH2.0for 2h, and remained at concentrations of 3.67×102 cfu·mL-1 and 2.30×103 cfu·mL-1 in incubation for 4h.Our results suggest that both of the tested strains have great tolerance to the artificial intestinal juice.Though the survival rate of FJAT7928and FJAT-7926decreased as the concentration of bile salt increased, the concentrates of the both strains kept in the same order of magnitude.After 4hincubation in the artificial intestinal juice containing 0.3% or 0.5% bile salt, the survival rates for FJAT-7926and FJAT-7928were more than 70% and 40%, respectirely.The above indicated that both FJAT-7926and FJAT-7928have high tolerance to simulated gastrointestinal environments and both of them have broad prospects in the application of fermentation of phytoprotein yoghurt beverage.
  • 刘芸, 刘波, 朱育菁, 等.黑豆酸奶发酵微生物鉴定与发酵特性的研究[J].福建农业学报, 2011, 26 (3) :450-456.
    郭本恒.益生菌[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2004.
    王玉华, 高晶, 冯印, 等.鼠李糖乳杆菌耐酸及胆盐能力研究[J].食品科学, 2008, 29 (12) :449-451.
    FULLER R.Probiotics in man and animals[J].J Appl Bacteriol, 1989, 66:365-378.
    VERSCHUERE L, ROMBAUT G, SORGELOOS P, et al.Probiotic Bacteria as Biological Control Agents in Aquaculture[J].Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 2000, 64 (4) :655-671.
    曾东, 王益平, 倪学勤, 等.鲤益生菌筛选及部分菌株对鲤前肠黏液的体外黏附作用[J].中国水产科学, 2009, 16 (3) :427-433.
    诸葛健, 王正祥.工业微生物试验技术手册[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社, 1994:686.
    GALINDO A B.Lactobacillus Plantarum 44Aas a Live Feed Supplement for Freshwater Fish[J].Wageningen:Wageningen University, 2004:27-45.
    HUNGER W, PEITERSEN N.Chapter 2New technical aspect of the preparation of starter cultures[J].Bulletin-International Daily Federation, 1992:17-17.
    徐义刚, 崔丽春, 赵丽丽, 等.重组干酪乳酸菌在模拟消化环境中生存性能的研究[J].中国微生态学杂志, 2006, 18 (6) :424-426.
    赵瑞香, 李元瑞, 孙俊良, 等.嗜酸乳杆菌在模拟胃肠环境中抗生的研究[J].微生物学通报, 2002, 29 (2) :35-38.
    张刚.乳酸细菌——基础、技术和应用[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2007.
    孙云章, 杨红玲, 马如龙, 等.斜带石斑鱼消化道乳酸菌在模拟胃肠环境中的存活[J].中国水产科学, 2010, 17 (1) :128-135.
    GILLILAND S E.Health and nutritional benefits from lactic acid bacteria[J].FEMS Microbiol Reviews, 1990, 87:175-188.
    GILLILAND S E, WALKER D K.Factors to consider when selecting a culture of Lactobacillus acidophilus as a dietary adjunct to produce a hypocholesterolemic effect in humans[J].J Dairy Sci, 1990, 73 (4) :905-911.
    HOVE H, NRGAARD H, MORTENSEN P B.Lactic acid bacteria and the human gastrointestinal tract[J].Eur J Clin Nutr, 1999, 53 (5) :339-350.
    杨颖, 田丰伟, 陈卫, 等.两株乳杆菌益生特性的体外研究[J].中国乳品工业, 2006, 34 (6) :16-19.
    赵瑞香, 孙俊良, 李元瑞, 等.嗜酸乳杆菌抗酸抗胆汁能力的研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2004, 32 (2) :57-60.
    DE VRIES M, VAUGHAN E E, KLEEREBEZEM M, et al.Lactobacillus plantarum-survival, functional and potential probiotic properties in the human intestinal tract[J].Int Dairy J, 2006, 16 (9) :1018-1028.
    杨郁, 张丽靖, 天知诚吾.耐酸性乳酸菌的筛选及应用的初步研究[J].浙江农业科学, 2006, (4) :463-466.
    曹永梅.保护剂在冷冻干燥双歧杆菌中的作用[J].食品与发酵工业, 2000, 26 (2) :40-45.
    郜宗茂.发酵绿豆奶饮料的加工工艺和营养分析[J].安徽农业技术师范学报, 2001, 15 (2) :52-53.
    卫雅芳, 姜忠丽, 毛红骞.以牛乳和大豆乳为原料混合发酵酸乳的研究[J].粮食与食品工业, 2003, (3) :34-36.
    吴君艳.凝固型大豆酸奶的工艺研究[J].农产品加工, 2007, (10) :53-57.
    郑立红, 张建才, 李春华, 等.牛奶、大豆蛋白复合酸奶的研制[J].食品与发酵工业, 2008, 34 (4) :154-158.
    顾瑞霞, 谭东兴, 郭久和, 等.胆汁酸盐和低pH值对乳酸菌活性的影响[J].微生物学通报, 1996, 23 (3) :144-146.
    孙艳波.酸奶用乳酸菌的人工消化耐受性研究[J].中国乳品工业, 2005, 33 (9) :30-31.
  • Related Articles

    [1]WANG Fen, YU Pei, ZHAI Yuan, LI Chuangang, LUO Siyu, PEI Huimin. Proteomics of Tea Plant in Response to Infestation by Empoasca vitis[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 39(10): 1179-1188. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2024.10.009
    [2]GAO Dongmei, HUANGFU Jiayi, GUO Xiao. Migration and Dispersion of Empoasca vitis in Tea Plantations Analyzed by HYSPLIT[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 39(5): 593-599. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2024.05.011
    [3]LI Jinyu, WANG Qingsen, LI Liangde, WANG Dingfeng, ZENG Mingsen, WU Guangyuan. Research Progress on the Dominant Species Identification of Tea Green Leafhopper and the Relationship Between Its Population and the Biological and Ecological Environment[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 37(1): 123-130. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.01.016
    [4]ZHENG Yiping, CHEN Jian, ZHU Bingyao. Genome-wide Identification and Expression Analysis of Metacaspase Gene Family in strawberry[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 35(11): 1188-1197. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2020.11.003
    [5]LI Hui-ling, LI Peng, ZHANG Hui, WANG Ding-feng, WANG Qing-sen, CENG Ming-sen, WU Guang-yuan. Effect of Pesticides on Egg-parasitoid of Tea Green Leafhoppersat Tea Gardens[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 30(10): 993-996. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2015.10.014
    [6]LI Jian-yu, SHI Meng-zhu, FU Jian-wei, YOU Yong, ZHENG Li-zhen, LIN Tao, YANG Xiao-wan. Monitoring and Regional Differentiations on Insecticide-resistance of Empoasca vitis[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 30(10): 989-992. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2015.10.013
    [7]LI Hui-ling, LIU Feng-jing, WANG Ding-feng, ZHANG Wen-jin, WU Guang-yuan, LIN Nai-quan. Effects of Shading on Population Dynamics of Small Green Leafhopper[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 28(12): 1281-1284. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.12.019
    [8]WANG Ding-feng, LIU Feng-jing, LI Hui-ling, ZHANG Hui, WU Guang-yuan. Time-dose-mortality Model Analysis of Beauveria bassiana XJBb3005 Against Myllocerinus aurolineatus[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 28(8): 807-811. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.08.016
    [9]WANG Qing-sen, WANG Ding-feng, WU Guang-yuan. Research Advances on Empoasca vitis(Gothe)in Tea Trees in China[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 28(6): 615-623. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.06.022
    [10]LI Hui-ling, LIN Nai-quan. The Influence of Temperature and Humidity on the Population Dynamics of Small Green Leafhopper at Tea Garden[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 27(1): 55-59.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 孙国波,段修军,张蕾,陆艳凤,王丽华,田培余,伍旗,杨孟广. SLC家族成员对黑羽番鸭羽色性状的作用初探. 中国家禽. 2023(03): 38-44 .
    2. 段修军,孙国波,张蕾,陆艳凤,王丽华,田培余,刘嘉晟,杨孟广. 基于RNA-Seq鉴定黑羽番鸭肉质风味差异的候选基因. 江苏农业学报. 2022(03): 739-747 .
    3. 周明夏,张蕾,章敬旗,王健. 开产前和产蛋高峰期泰州鹅卵巢转录组SNP分析. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版). 2022(04): 36-44 .
    4. 段修军,孙国波,张蕾,陆艳凤,王丽华,田培余,张卫明. 番鸭羽色性状相关差异表达基因的转录组对比分析. 畜牧与兽医. 2022(10): 12-18 .
    5. 周迪,杨蓉,李俊,李建伟,赵忠海,任丽群,谭晓山,王燕,王府,谢玲玲. 转录组测序技术在鹅产业相关研究中的应用. 当代畜牧. 2022(12): 55-61 .

    Other cited types(5)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(10)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return