• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊
ZHANG Wu-jun, HUANG Ying-zhen, Zhao Yun-qing, LIU Bao-cai, CHEN Jing-ying. Effect of Drought Stress on Physiology of Camellia nitidissima Saplings[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(6): 614-620. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.06.013
Citation: ZHANG Wu-jun, HUANG Ying-zhen, Zhao Yun-qing, LIU Bao-cai, CHEN Jing-ying. Effect of Drought Stress on Physiology of Camellia nitidissima Saplings[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(6): 614-620. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.06.013

Effect of Drought Stress on Physiology of Camellia nitidissima Saplings

More Information
  • Received Date: March 07, 2018
  • Revised Date: May 30, 2018
  • Potted 3-year-old saplings of Camellia nitidissima Chi were grown under drought stress to monitor the physiological responses of the plants. The results showed that (1)mild drought could lower the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), but a relative water content in soil as low as 20% would not irreversibly damage the photosynthetic function of a 3-year-old C. nitidissima; (2) under a mild or moderate drought condition, the leaf relative water content (LRWC) of the saplings would decline slightly, while the contents of malondialdehyde (MDA), chlorophyll (chl)and soluble sugars (SS) as well as the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) would not differ significantly from those of CK; (3) under moderate stress, the peroxidase (POD) activity, carotenoid (Car) content after 15 d of exposure, proline (Pro) at beginning, andsoluble protein (SP) after 15 d were all significantly elevated as compared to CK; and under severe drought, all physiological indicators except Car content were altered significantly. It appeared that mild or moderate drought (when the soil relative water content was reduced to 65% or 40%) indeed affected the physiology of the saplings, but only severe drought (when the soil relative water content became as low as 20%-25%) would permanently change it. Therefore, whenever the water level in soilwas below 25%, appropriate water management and timelywatering could sufficiently avert any serious damages that might incur to the saplings by draught.
  • [1]
    韦霄, 蒋运生, 韦记青, 等.珍稀濒危植物金花茶地理分布与生境调查研究[J].生态环境学报, 2007, 16(3):895-899. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=tryhj200703039
    [2]
    曹芬, 樊兰兰.金花茶研究进展[J].中国药业, 2013, 22(4):95-96. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zlzw201407019
    [3]
    陈永欣, 吕淑娟, 韦锦斌.金花茶化学成分和药理作用研究进展[J].广西中医药, 2013, 36(1):4-6. http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_zcy201112045
    [4]
    郭建.金花茶等5种物品被批准为新资源食品[J].农产品加工, 2010, 1(6):39. http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=34122035
    [5]
    黄付平.金花茶林下人工栽培试验初报[J].广西林业科学, 2001, 30(3):125-128. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90684A/200103/5769907.html
    [6]
    李建基, 廖国英, 黄霖.金花茶林下种植栽培技术要点[J].农村经济与科技, 2016, 27(20):41-42. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7103.2016.20.029
    [7]
    林植.金花茶在阔叶林林下种植技术初探[J].花卉, 2015, 1(22):10-11. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8496.2015.22.003
    [8]
    柴胜丰, 唐健民, 王满莲, 等.干旱胁迫对金花茶幼苗光合生理特性的影响[J].西北植物学报, 2015, 35(2):322-328. DOI: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2015.02.0322
    [9]
    杨期和, 李旭群, 杨和生, 等.金花茶幼苗光合生理生态特性研究[J].北京林业大学学报, 2010, 32(2):57-63. https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/5c32c3d980eb6294dd886c2f.html
    [10]
    邹琦.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2003.
    [11]
    王学奎.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2006.
    [12]
    MOORE K. Measurement of lipid peroxidation[J]. Free Radical Research, 1998, 28(6):659. DOI: 10.3109/10715769809065821
    [13]
    CHAVES M M, FLEXAS J, PINHEIRO C. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress:regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell[J]. Annals of Botany, 2009, 103(4):551. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcn125
    [14]
    PINHEIRO C, CHAVES M M. Photosynthesis and drought:can we make metabolic connections from available data?[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2011, 62(3):869. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erq340
    [15]
    周光良, 罗杰, 胡红玲, 等.干旱胁迫对巨桉幼树生长及光合特性的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报, 2015, 31(6):888-894. DOI: 10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2015.06.014
    [16]
    裴斌, 张光灿, 张淑勇, 等.土壤干旱胁迫对沙棘叶片光合作用和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].生态学报, 2013, 33(5):1386-1396. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-STXB201305005.htm
    [17]
    姬慧娟, 贾会霞, 章小铃, 等.干旱胁迫对红皮柳光合特性日变化及生长的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(6):41-46. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-LYKJ201306003.htm
    [18]
    FARQUHAR G D, SHARKEY T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis[J].Annu Rev Plant Physiol, 1982, 33(1):317-345. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pp.33.060182.001533
    [19]
    汪本福, 黄金鹏, 杨晓龙, 等.干旱胁迫抑制作物光合作用机理研究进展[J].湖北农业科学, 2014, 53(23):5628-5632. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-LYKE201511015.htm
    [20]
    邓旭, 董晨, 张广明.干旱对两种金花茶幼苗抗氧化能力及渗透物质含量的影响[J].热带作物学报, 2012, 33(6):1034-1039. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=rdzwxb201206013
    [21]
    张雁霞, 李萍, 刘玉皎.西北地区蚕豆苗期干旱胁迫下表型差异性与抗旱性研究[J].东北农业大学学报, 2015, 46(9):30-37. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10298-2008113038.htm
    [22]
    朱教君, 康宏樟, 李智辉, 等.水分胁迫对不同年龄沙地樟子松幼苗存活与光合特性影响[J].生态学报, 2005, 25(10):2527-2533. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.10.010
    [23]
    JUBANY-MARÍ T, MUNNÉ-BOSCH S, ALEGRE L. Redox regulation of water stress responses in field-grown plants. Role of hydrogen peroxide and ascorbate[J]. Plant Physiology & Biochemistry Ppb. 2010, 48(5):351. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0981942810000276
    [24]
    邓仁菊, 卢扬, 曾宪浩, 等.持续干旱胁迫对青薯9号幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J].西南农业学报, 2017, 30(2):291-295. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZJLK201503004.htm
    [25]
    WU S, HU C, TAN Q, et al. Effects of molybdenum on water utilization, antioxidative defense system and osmotic-adjustment ability in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) under drought stress[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2014, 83:365-374. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.08.022
    [26]
    杨柳, 何正军, 赵文吉, 等.狭叶红景天幼苗对水分及遮阴的生长及生理生化响应[J].生态学报, 2017, 37(14):4706-4714. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWSL200304011.htm
    [27]
    季杨, 张新全, 彭燕, 等.干旱胁迫对鸭茅根、叶保护酶活性、渗透物质含量及膜质过氧化作用的影响[J].草业学报, 2014, 23(3):144-151. DOI: 10.11686/cyxb20140316
  • Related Articles

    [1]LIU Shixiang, CAI Xing, WU Wenxiu, LIU Xiaoying, RONG Jundong, ZHENG Yushan, CHEN Liguang. Effects of Biochar Addition on Physiology of Fokienia hodginsii Seedlings under Drought and Enzyme Activities in Soil[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 39(7): 794-800. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2024.07.006
    [2]CHEN Cuihong, ZHOU Yunwei, LI Jiaqi, YANG Fengrui, BAI Yun, CHEN Lifei. Physiology of Adonis amurensis as Affected by Drought[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 36(5): 532-541. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2021.05.006
    [3]YE Bao-jian, SU Chun-lian, ZENG Qin-meng, LUO Xiao, CHEN Shi-pin, CHEN Hui. Research progress of drought stress to Camellia oleifera[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 35(3): 351-358. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2020.03.016
    [4]LI Cai-xia, LIN Bi-ying, SHEN Bao-ying, LIU Xu, LIU Ya-nan, LIAO Zi-yue. Effects of Low Temperature on Physiological Properties of Eggplant Seedlings and Selection of Cold-Tolerance Indicators[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(9): 930-936. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.09.008
    [5]XIAO Xiao-jun, HUANG Qian, LUO Chen-yong, WANG Fang. Effect of Salicylic Acid Soaking on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Corn Under Drought Stress[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 32(6): 583-586. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2017.06.003
    [6]CHANG Xiao-jun, GUO Yu-qiong, WANG Zhong, ZHAO Shan-shan, ZHU Chen, LIN Yu-ling, LAI Zhong-xiong. Cloning and Expression Analysis of Ring-type E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene in Camellia sinensis cv. Tieguanyin Under Drought Stress[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 31(8): 826-832. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2016.08.007
    [7]MA Guang-shu, DENG Yi-jiang, QIN Zhi-wei, LIU Fang, LI Dan-dan, LIAN Hua. Effect of Soil Type on Physiological Characteristics, Yield, and Quality of Cucumbers[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 31(6): 586-590. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2016.06.006
    [8]ZHANG Su-zhou. Effect of Drought Stress on Growing Development and Physiological Characteristics of Pennisetum setaceum[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 29(8): 752-756. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2014.08.009
    [9]ZHAO Ting, ZHENG Xiang-li, XU Guo-zhong, ZHANG Ding-hua, WENG Bo-qi. Effects of Fertilization on Peanut Physiology and Quality[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 26(3): 490-497.
    [10]JIANG Zhao-wei, LIN Wen-xiong, LI Yi-zhen, ZHUO Chuan-ying, YANG Hui-jie, XIE Hua-an. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer rates on some physiological characteristics of ratoon rice[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2005, 20(3): 168-171.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(23)

    1. 林文磊,吕美琴,李明松,施迎迎,康蓉蓉,曾红英. 47份福建省鲜食春大豆种质资源的遗传分析及综合评价. 福建农业学报. 2024(03): 276-289 . 本站查看
    2. 韩岱,时晓磊,丁孙磊,张金波,严勇亮. 60份大豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定评价. 大豆科学. 2023(04): 494-505 .
    3. 隋翔鹏,周永刚,孙鹏宇,李森权,叶开烨,王栋灵,井妍,李海燕. 中国热区适应性高产大豆种质的评价与筛选. 分子植物育种. 2023(21): 7292-7299 .
    4. 杨芳,梁海燕,宋晓强,邓亚蕊,李海. 晋北地区15个苜蓿品种产量及品质分析. 饲料研究. 2023(18): 119-123 .
    5. 李妍颖,李梅梅,杨琪,陈丽慧,李伯辽,房爱省,何柯杭,董继广,赵玉婉,于志浩,郝引川,仵均祥. 亚洲玉米螟为害对玉米产量的影响与防治指标研究. 植物保护. 2022(01): 82-89 .
    6. 李炜,毕影东,刘建新,王玲,刘淼,邸树峰,樊超,杨光,谢婷婷,来永才. 寒地野生大豆资源农艺性状的相关性和主成分分析. 土壤与作物. 2022(01): 10-17 .
    7. 陈观杰,郑殿峰,冯乃杰,沈雪峰,母德伟,刘玲,李甜子,周行,齐德强,谢平. 雷州半岛地区大豆农艺性状因子和聚类分析. 浙江农业科学. 2022(03): 485-491+523 .
    8. 王玲燕,黄金华,张素平,黄中文,董彦琪,朱红彩,唐振海. 夏大豆种质资源农艺性状与产量的多样性分析. 湖北农业科学. 2022(10): 15-19+47 .
    9. 黎松松,赖建军,张红梅,崔晓艳,刘晓庆,陈新,朱月林,陈华涛. 江苏鲜食春大豆种质资源表型鉴定及综合评价. 大豆科学. 2022(04): 385-396 .
    10. 杨芳,梁海燕,林凤仙,宋晓强,邓亚蕊,李海. 24份黍子材料农艺性状主成分和聚类分析. 农学学报. 2022(08): 27-34 .
    11. 郭敏杰,邓丽,李玉荣,王瑾,任丽. 基于主成分和聚类分析的冀花高油酸花生品种综合评价. 中国油料作物学报. 2022(06): 1210-1217 .
    12. 王玲燕,刘贺娟,任福森,唐振海,董彦琪,刘震宇. 98份大葱种质资源农艺性状相关性及主成分分析. 中国瓜菜. 2021(08): 38-43 .
    13. 李艳红,聂俊,郑锦荣,谭德龙,张长远,史亮亮,谢玉明. 华南地区樱桃番茄表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价. 园艺学报. 2021(09): 1717-1730 .
    14. 李琼,常世豪,舒文涛,杨青春,李金花,张东辉,张保亮,张来成,耿臻. 黄淮海地区夏大豆(南片)46份大豆品种(系)农艺性状综合分析. 新疆农业科学. 2021(10): 1765-1774 .
    15. 范继征,石达金,吕巨智,唐国荣,程伟东. 基于关联度、主成分和聚类分析的西南区玉米新组合评价. 种子. 2020(01): 102-110 .
    16. 郑淑琳,石玉涛,王飞权,张渤,王涵,林立,石元值,叶乃兴. 乌龙茶种质资源矿质元素含量特征分析与评价. 福建农业学报. 2020(02): 150-160 . 本站查看
    17. 石玉涛,郑淑琳,王飞权,陈荣冰,李远华,张渤,王涵,林立. 武夷名丛茶树种质资源矿质元素含量特征分析. 中国农业科技导报. 2020(07): 37-50 .
    18. 刘珮君,王晓敏,李国花,郑福顺,赵宇飞,胡新华,付金军,高艳明,李建设. 166份番茄种质资源的综合评价. 云南大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(04): 792-803 .
    19. 刘杰,张春宵,李淑芳,曹铁华,梁烜赫,刘学岩,马永鑫,郑大浩,李晓辉. 81份玉米杂交种萌发期耐冷性的鉴定和评价. 玉米科学. 2020(05): 20-26+31 .
    20. 吕丹,黎瑞源,郑冉,郑俊青,朱丽伟,石桃雄,陈庆富. 213份苦荞种质资源主要农艺性状分析及高产种质筛选. 南方农业学报. 2020(10): 2429-2439 .
    21. 李方舟,张海生,王军,杨婷婷,古晓红,李广信,刘晋联. 山西省大豆多点试验品系农艺性状分析. 山西农业科学. 2019(06): 931-934+1010 .
    22. 王婷婷,韦小丽,张兰. 贵州不同种源棕榈苗期生长性状比较及评价. 经济林研究. 2019(03): 146-152 .
    23. 牟书靓,牛海龙,李伟堂,杨翔宇,王曙文,刘红欣,何中国. 花生种质资源农艺性状主成分及聚类分析. 辽宁农业科学. 2019(06): 1-5 .

    Other cited types(3)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (903) PDF downloads (14) Cited by(26)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return