• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊
Volume 33 Issue 7
Mar.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
LI Guo-liang, LIN Zhao-miao, XU Yong-qing, LIU Zhong-hua, ZHANG Hong, LI Hua-wei, JI Rong-chang, LUO Wen-bin, TANG Hao, QIU Si-xin, QIU Yong-xiang. Photosynthesis-Light Response Models for Varieties of Sweet Potato[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(7): 687-690. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.07.007
Citation: LI Guo-liang, LIN Zhao-miao, XU Yong-qing, LIU Zhong-hua, ZHANG Hong, LI Hua-wei, JI Rong-chang, LUO Wen-bin, TANG Hao, QIU Si-xin, QIU Yong-xiang. Photosynthesis-Light Response Models for Varieties of Sweet Potato[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(7): 687-690. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.07.007
shu

Photosynthesis-Light Response Models for Varieties of Sweet Potato

  • Institute of Crop Sciences, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Tuber and Root Crops in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, Fuzhou, Fujian 350013 China

More Information
  • Received Date: January 11, 2018
  • Revised Date: June 13, 2018
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Four commonly appliedmathematical models were used to fit the photosynthesis-lightresponses of various sweetpotato plants under light exposures.The light saturation point (Isat) obtained from either the rectangular or the non-rectangular hyperbolic model was considerably lower than themeasured values. Although theexponential function model predicted Isat and the maximum net photosynthetic rate (Pnmax), it tended to give much lower valuesthan actualmeasurements on the light compensation point and the dark respiration rate. The modified rectangular hyperbolic model seemed to better fit for the functions. Using the new model, it was found that Fushu 2 and Guangshu 87 had the best photosynthetic capability among the 8 varieties of sweetpotato tested.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (11)
  • [1]
    李莹. 5种半蒴苣苔属植物光合特性的比较[J].植物资源与环境学报, 2015, 24(2):19-25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2015.02.03
    [2]
    周鹏.刨花润楠不同种源光响应曲线分析[J].华南农业大学学报, 2016, 37(4):57-62. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hnnydxxb201604010
    [3]
    BASSMAN J H, ZWIER J C. Gas exchange characteristics of Populus trichocarpa, Populus deltoides and Populus trichocarpa x P. deltoides clones[J]. Tree physiology, 1991, 8(2):145-159. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/8.2.145
    [4]
    叶子飘, 于强.一个光合作用光响应新模型与传统模型的比较[J].沈阳农业大学学报, 2007, 38(6):771-775. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1700.2007.06.001
    [5]
    叶子飘.光响应模型在超级杂交稻组合-Ⅱ优明86中的应用[J].生态学杂志, 2007, 26(8):1323-1326. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxzz200708031
    [6]
    侯维海, 王建林, 旦巴等.青稞光合作用5种光响应模型的比较分析[J].作物杂志, 2017, 179(4):96-104. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwzz201704017
    [7]
    周多多, 蒋少伟, 吴桂林等.不同水分条件下胡杨光响应曲线拟合模型比较[J].植物科学学报, 2017, 35(3):406-412. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/whzwxyj201703013
    [8]
    叶子飘.光合作用对光和CO2响应模型的研究进展[J].植物生态学报, 2010, 34(6):727-740. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.06.012
    [9]
    张磊. 3种专用型甘薯光合光响应曲线及其模型拟合研究[J].中国农学通报, 2015, 31(15):71-77. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb14110037
    [10]
    BALY E C. The kinetics of photosynthesis[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society SerB(Biological Sciences), 1935, 117:218-239. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1935.0026
    [11]
    THORNLEY J H M. Dynamic model of leaf photosynthesis with acclimation to light and nitrogen[J]. Annals of Botany, 1998, 81:431-430. DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1997.0577
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]YAO Zongze, YANG Yan, ZI Zhenlan, YANG Xiaohong, LIU Yanfang, WANG Shimin. DUS Test for Standard Varieties of Maize Grown in Ecological Regions on Low Latitude Plateaus[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 40(1): 45-52. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2025.01.006
    [2]HUANG Xiao-yun, ZENG Jian-wei, HUANG Yi-bin, ZHOU Da-shun, CHEN Min-jian. Effects of Mushroom Discards and Foliar Fertilizer on Growth and Kinsenoside Content in Anoectochilus roxburghii (Wall.) Lindl.[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(1): 41-45. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.01.008
    [3]ZHANG Gu-feng, LUO Gang, ZHU Xian-min, ZHU Feng. An Android-based Forecasting System for Disease Management on Wheat Head Blight in Jiangsu Province[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 31(9): 966-970. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2016.09.013
    [4]QIU Rong-zhou, CHEN Xiao, CHEN Hong, CHI Mei-xiang, ZHAO Jian. A Data Collection System for Ecology and Biodiversity Investigation of Wuyi Mountain base on Android[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 29(2): 188-193. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2014.02.019
    [5]DONG Xiu-yun, ZHENG Jin-gui. Current Status and Strategies of Tea Standardization in Fujian Province[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 28(12): 1298-1302. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.12.022
    [6]WANG Sheng-hua. Annual Growth Regularity and Grading Standards for Sarcandra glabra Seedling[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 28(10): 993-998. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.10.012
    [7]HUANG Yu-ji, CHEN Jing-ying, SU Hai-lan, HUANG Ying-zhen, WAN Xue-feng. rDNA-ITS of Radix ophiopogonis and Radix liriopes from different regions[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 24(6): 508-512.
    [8]LIU Yong-chang. Some thoughts on the construction of agricultural standardization in Fujian Province[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2005, 20(4): 292-295.
    [9]Wang Jinghui, Weng Zhihui, Yang Xiaoping. The Writing Standardization of Sci-tech Papers Ⅰ The Characteristics and Writing Requirements[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1997, 12(4): 55-59.
    [10]Wang Jianhui, Ou Lin. The Writing Standardization of Set-tech Papers Ⅱ.The Standard Expression of Sci-tech Papers[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1997, 12(1): 60-64.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 余洪涛，史艳财，韦霄，邓丽丽. 五指毛桃种苗质量分级标准研究. 广西科学院学报. 2023(01): 93-99 .
    2. 戴艳娇，贺爱国，胡志鑫，柏连阳，赵硕，聂阳阳，陈锦. 植物修复用伴矿景天种苗质量分级标准研究. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版). 2022(04): 473-482 .
    3. 普甜，宋静，张志华，陈婉东，王娟. 大田培育滇牡丹实生苗分级标准及不同种源苗期生长评价研究. 安徽农业科学. 2022(24): 98-102 .
    4. 赵云青，陈菁瑛，黄颖桢，张武君，刘保财. 中药材种苗质量分级标准研究进展. 福建农业科技. 2021(05): 38-44 .
    5. 李嘉惠，胡贞贞，张宏意，林丹，卢昌华，刘晓莹，严寒静. 广藿香种苗质量分级标准研究. 种子. 2018(11): 124-128 .

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1360) PDF downloads (17) Cited by(11)
    Related

    Copyright © 2018 Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, All Rights Reserved. 闽ICP备19004781号-1 网安备：35010046024-23001

    Address: 247 Wusi Road, Fuzhou City China Pos: 350003 Tel: 0591-87869455 E-mail: fjnyxb@163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return